'Could these drugs be altering bio markers that have nothing to do with “HIV” at all? It’s an intriguing possibility with potentially enormous implications.'
Indeed the biomarker (antibody to p24) said to indicate 'HIV" has never been shown to have anything to do with 'HIV'. This could definitely have enormous implications. PrEP will certainly produce an imbalance in the body which the p24 is often associated with
The PCR cannot be used for 'viral load' as there are so many genomes (millions) so it's completely pot luck whether the primers chosen in a test find any 'HIV" sequences in a particular patient.
I've been suspecting this for a long time. PrEP is a kind of slight of hand. It's like you take a drug that makes you not smell a certain smell, and you walk into a room with that smell, and you think the molecules of that smell aren't present because you can't smell them. PrEP is doing the same thing, it's just masking biomarkers that are interpreted as 'HIV'. This leads to an interesting question as to whether the people developing these drugs at the pharmaceutical companies actually know 'HIV' is a sham and have developed drugs that mask becoming 'positive'.
"The virus was detected, however, using a quantitative test, COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan HIV-1 Test kit, with HIV-1 RNA level below the lower limit of detection (<20 copies/mL)"
Yeah, that's just preposterous. Below 20 copies/mL is arbitrarily set anyway, so if you don't like 19 copies/mL as your result, well then you just willy-nilly declare that 19 is enough to be infected. Why not 2 copies/mL or even 1 as indicating positive?
"if PrEP has the potential to cause “low or undetectable viral loads” during “acute infection,” how then does the patient manage to “seroconvert” at all?"
Yes, I was wondering this exact thing. Either PrEP suppresses 'HIV' and prevents it from taking hold, as measured by a person going in and getting an antibody screening text every 3 months; or it doesn't. They're in denial about the randomness of these tests trying desperately to make them somehow consistent.
"Could these drugs be altering bio markers that have nothing to do with “HIV” at all? It’s an intriguing possibility with potentially enormous implications."
Yes, I've already mentioned this as something I've wondered about in other posts.
Regarding 'acute retroviral syndrome', it's funny because people get sick all the time for who knows what reasons, but I suppose if you're having a lot of sex then you can only get sick by a virus passed through sex now.
Fun fact: I had originally wanted to base my dissertation on modeling acute “HIV” infection and its implication in progression to AIDS, but there were insufficient — almost no — data or studies available at the time. (They are still few and far between.) Considering I was modeling the effects of treatment, I suppose that would have been kind of like modeling post exposure prophylaxis.
Acute retroviral syndrome is a total joke. Given a period of 4- 6 weeks, I’d guess that a good portion of any group of people would have some kind of influenza like illness within that time frame. And some of the symptoms I’ve heard people report are things like tinnitus and headaches! Talk about seeing what you want to see. I actually think this syndrome is probably made up to scare people even more—“oh my god I had unprotected sex and then I got the flu! I’m going to die of AIDS! I better get tested stat.” It’s all so obvious I don’t know how most people are still buying this.
As one of my mathematical mentors, Dr. Robert Pare (category theorist if any math nerds care) once said, “every theorem is trivial once you’ve proved it.”
Thank you, Miss Rebecca. Having worked in drug discovery for over two decades, and understanding the systemic toxicity of all drugs- that combined with the percentage of people taking prescription drugs, makes me wonder how many of today's illnesses and conditions are actually adverse reactions to toxic medications.
I would be happy to share. Though, as a technical person, my job was to design and execute experiments, and compile data, while my credentialed superiors chose which information was published or released. But, by coincidence or design, my personal working experience includes expertise with all the methodologies and technologies used to create the current medical fraud known as covid. My specialty of the past 15yrs was teaching complex scientific concepts in simple terms to my young scientist pupils, most of whom entered the vaccine production industry. As you wish.
The language and “medical logic” the mainstream establishment uses is so purposefully convoluted and obfuscating as to keep in the dark the layperson who wants to decipher the info about hiv and may have “unacceptable” questions. That way, they can: keep them wondering what the facts are; keep their mouths shut about stuff of “which they know nothing”; and keep the deceptions flowing out/the money flowing in. Even with your breakdowns of the establishment’s reasoning, it’s still somewhat confusing (to me, anyway); however, I can understand your explanations and ideas better than the “juh-nl” crap.
It’s definitely a challenge to try to explain in an understandable way the mental gymnastics and internal contradictions these people indulge in constantly, but I will continue to try to make it comprehensible. Thanks for your comment!
Oh, and by the way, something interesting. I noticed this on my Twitter feed today, a guy I follow posted a picture of himself in the hospital after a surgery. In his profile he mentions that he's 'HIV negative thanks to PrEP'. He wrote this, "Out of surgery for hopefully the last time! 5 years of bone deterioration, bone collapses, 3 major surgeries, PT, and never being able to squat/lift like most guys wears on you. Lots of metal in me now, but so far I feel good about the results! Half boy, half robot". He's maybe in his mid-30s.
That’s actually heartbreaking. It’s total Stockholm syndrome. There is so obviously a bigger goal here than simply “ending HIV.” How is this not obvious to everyone??? Have we been collectively hypnotized?
I haven’t really been active on X, ever, but I want to get more involved so please let me know if there are any accounts I should be following. I literally just tweet links to my posts, very inconsistently.
Again, that’s awful about that guy. I can’t comprehend going through all those surgeries. It must be just devastating.
'Could these drugs be altering bio markers that have nothing to do with “HIV” at all? It’s an intriguing possibility with potentially enormous implications.'
Indeed the biomarker (antibody to p24) said to indicate 'HIV" has never been shown to have anything to do with 'HIV'. This could definitely have enormous implications. PrEP will certainly produce an imbalance in the body which the p24 is often associated with
The PCR cannot be used for 'viral load' as there are so many genomes (millions) so it's completely pot luck whether the primers chosen in a test find any 'HIV" sequences in a particular patient.
I've been suspecting this for a long time. PrEP is a kind of slight of hand. It's like you take a drug that makes you not smell a certain smell, and you walk into a room with that smell, and you think the molecules of that smell aren't present because you can't smell them. PrEP is doing the same thing, it's just masking biomarkers that are interpreted as 'HIV'. This leads to an interesting question as to whether the people developing these drugs at the pharmaceutical companies actually know 'HIV' is a sham and have developed drugs that mask becoming 'positive'.
"The virus was detected, however, using a quantitative test, COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan HIV-1 Test kit, with HIV-1 RNA level below the lower limit of detection (<20 copies/mL)"
Yeah, that's just preposterous. Below 20 copies/mL is arbitrarily set anyway, so if you don't like 19 copies/mL as your result, well then you just willy-nilly declare that 19 is enough to be infected. Why not 2 copies/mL or even 1 as indicating positive?
"if PrEP has the potential to cause “low or undetectable viral loads” during “acute infection,” how then does the patient manage to “seroconvert” at all?"
Yes, I was wondering this exact thing. Either PrEP suppresses 'HIV' and prevents it from taking hold, as measured by a person going in and getting an antibody screening text every 3 months; or it doesn't. They're in denial about the randomness of these tests trying desperately to make them somehow consistent.
"Could these drugs be altering bio markers that have nothing to do with “HIV” at all? It’s an intriguing possibility with potentially enormous implications."
Yes, I've already mentioned this as something I've wondered about in other posts.
Regarding 'acute retroviral syndrome', it's funny because people get sick all the time for who knows what reasons, but I suppose if you're having a lot of sex then you can only get sick by a virus passed through sex now.
Fun fact: I had originally wanted to base my dissertation on modeling acute “HIV” infection and its implication in progression to AIDS, but there were insufficient — almost no — data or studies available at the time. (They are still few and far between.) Considering I was modeling the effects of treatment, I suppose that would have been kind of like modeling post exposure prophylaxis.
Acute retroviral syndrome is a total joke. Given a period of 4- 6 weeks, I’d guess that a good portion of any group of people would have some kind of influenza like illness within that time frame. And some of the symptoms I’ve heard people report are things like tinnitus and headaches! Talk about seeing what you want to see. I actually think this syndrome is probably made up to scare people even more—“oh my god I had unprotected sex and then I got the flu! I’m going to die of AIDS! I better get tested stat.” It’s all so obvious I don’t know how most people are still buying this.
As one of my mathematical mentors, Dr. Robert Pare (category theorist if any math nerds care) once said, “every theorem is trivial once you’ve proved it.”
Thank you, Miss Rebecca. Having worked in drug discovery for over two decades, and understanding the systemic toxicity of all drugs- that combined with the percentage of people taking prescription drugs, makes me wonder how many of today's illnesses and conditions are actually adverse reactions to toxic medications.
I’d be curious to hear about your experiences in that line of work sometime if you ever care to share.
I would be happy to share. Though, as a technical person, my job was to design and execute experiments, and compile data, while my credentialed superiors chose which information was published or released. But, by coincidence or design, my personal working experience includes expertise with all the methodologies and technologies used to create the current medical fraud known as covid. My specialty of the past 15yrs was teaching complex scientific concepts in simple terms to my young scientist pupils, most of whom entered the vaccine production industry. As you wish.
The language and “medical logic” the mainstream establishment uses is so purposefully convoluted and obfuscating as to keep in the dark the layperson who wants to decipher the info about hiv and may have “unacceptable” questions. That way, they can: keep them wondering what the facts are; keep their mouths shut about stuff of “which they know nothing”; and keep the deceptions flowing out/the money flowing in. Even with your breakdowns of the establishment’s reasoning, it’s still somewhat confusing (to me, anyway); however, I can understand your explanations and ideas better than the “juh-nl” crap.
It’s definitely a challenge to try to explain in an understandable way the mental gymnastics and internal contradictions these people indulge in constantly, but I will continue to try to make it comprehensible. Thanks for your comment!
Oh, and by the way, something interesting. I noticed this on my Twitter feed today, a guy I follow posted a picture of himself in the hospital after a surgery. In his profile he mentions that he's 'HIV negative thanks to PrEP'. He wrote this, "Out of surgery for hopefully the last time! 5 years of bone deterioration, bone collapses, 3 major surgeries, PT, and never being able to squat/lift like most guys wears on you. Lots of metal in me now, but so far I feel good about the results! Half boy, half robot". He's maybe in his mid-30s.
Terrifying.
That’s actually heartbreaking. It’s total Stockholm syndrome. There is so obviously a bigger goal here than simply “ending HIV.” How is this not obvious to everyone??? Have we been collectively hypnotized?
I haven’t really been active on X, ever, but I want to get more involved so please let me know if there are any accounts I should be following. I literally just tweet links to my posts, very inconsistently.
Again, that’s awful about that guy. I can’t comprehend going through all those surgeries. It must be just devastating.
[edited for length.]