Turns out the author of the article is on twitter and I left his this tweet.
"It makes me wonder how many failures are needed before people wake up and realize a multitude of things react to the various HIV tests, it's not one thing. This is has been known for a long time. Read the work of the Perth Group and it's clear why these trials fail."
Their silence on this really says it all. There have been a few dismissive mentions of Duesberg by the establishment, but on Perth? Mute. That says a LOT.
What does 'failed' mean in this context? Does it mean they had people test positive in amongst the vaccinated? I've never understood how 'HIV' antibodies aren't protective if your body generates them, but they're supposed to be effective at protecting you if generated via a vaccine. In fact the presence of antibodies is medical certain doom.
I have to wonder how many of the researchers secretly know of the Perth Group's work on HIV antibodies. An entire class of people can't be so dense as to believe only one thing is causing a positive reaction in people.
I am honestly coming to the conclusion that PrEP is being so pushed right now because everyone knows a vaccine will never eventuate, so we’ll be using drugs as vaccines now. It makes more sense now.
There is no 'failure'. It is all in the pHARMa playbook of 'a forever searching'... ensuring lack of 'success', like chasing a rainbow, or like the Cancer Research Industry implicit disinterest to find cure.
But with this....
"Develop medications that can be used instead of vaccines, despite the fact that none of this makes any sense, and market them as “long lasting injectables.” " [2 months ain't long lasting is it?]
... they are tweaking their approach so as to get more 'stuff' in us via injections
'Sense' is not in the equation. They operate with their own 666 sense of sense. Baseline intent is the sustainability of their existence, so populations will constantly be injected and become under further control...and they get paid for it.
According to the article long term injectable prep is still going on I think that is what SA government is introducing injection to last 2 months with a possible to introduce 6 months and a once a year prevention prep
Turns out the author of the article is on twitter and I left his this tweet.
"It makes me wonder how many failures are needed before people wake up and realize a multitude of things react to the various HIV tests, it's not one thing. This is has been known for a long time. Read the work of the Perth Group and it's clear why these trials fail."
Their silence on this really says it all. There have been a few dismissive mentions of Duesberg by the establishment, but on Perth? Mute. That says a LOT.
Other than the BMJ debate, but that wasn’t really mainstream.
What does 'failed' mean in this context? Does it mean they had people test positive in amongst the vaccinated? I've never understood how 'HIV' antibodies aren't protective if your body generates them, but they're supposed to be effective at protecting you if generated via a vaccine. In fact the presence of antibodies is medical certain doom.
I have to wonder how many of the researchers secretly know of the Perth Group's work on HIV antibodies. An entire class of people can't be so dense as to believe only one thing is causing a positive reaction in people.
I am honestly coming to the conclusion that PrEP is being so pushed right now because everyone knows a vaccine will never eventuate, so we’ll be using drugs as vaccines now. It makes more sense now.
Same question I'm having Christoph
Thanks, Rebecca. Their chutzpah is breathtaking---
There is no 'failure'. It is all in the pHARMa playbook of 'a forever searching'... ensuring lack of 'success', like chasing a rainbow, or like the Cancer Research Industry implicit disinterest to find cure.
But with this....
"Develop medications that can be used instead of vaccines, despite the fact that none of this makes any sense, and market them as “long lasting injectables.” " [2 months ain't long lasting is it?]
... they are tweaking their approach so as to get more 'stuff' in us via injections
'Sense' is not in the equation. They operate with their own 666 sense of sense. Baseline intent is the sustainability of their existence, so populations will constantly be injected and become under further control...and they get paid for it.
According to the article long term injectable prep is still going on I think that is what SA government is introducing injection to last 2 months with a possible to introduce 6 months and a once a year prevention prep