No evidence AZT is toxic? Wow, what Alice in Wonderland world do they live in? Besides, in order for AZT to have 'anti-retroviral' properties, it needs to be tri-phosphorylated by cellular enzymes in order to have the supposed DNA chain terminating property. There was pharmicokinetic research looking at this way back in the day, and I think all but one of the papers showed that this tri-phosphorylation process took place by at least an order of magnitude or two below the threshold necessary for this ARV effect to happen. So instead, AZT was just a potent oxidizing agent that degraded the cells and killed people.
Recently I stumbled on a video about the early MTV reality personality Pedro Zamora. I remember seeing him on the show now and then. He died of 'AIDS' in 1994, having been 'diagnosed' with 'HIV' when he was 17 around 1989 after having donated blood. So what drug would he have been put on? AZT and DDI. He wasn't sick and had no idea he had 'HIV' until he was notified after donating blood. It just angers me, because he was killed by these drugs, but now he's a poster child for the whole AIDS paradigm. It's disgusting.
OMG my husband and I talked about him just a couple days ago! It definitely sounds like he was killed with the drugs because it happened WAY fast. He went from healthy to having cryptosporidium I think within months. Super suspicious. Very sad for him.
AZT is definitely one of these key "naked emperor" cognitive dissonance knots in the narrative tapestry. "Everyone knows" AZT is toxic and was a bad move, "but..." -- and then emotional reflexes hit the brakes before the runaway train of logical reasoning gets started and takes a person beyond the Big Lie(s) into the desert of the real.
It's easier to defend and justify errors (and crimes) a la carte than to embrace the full scary truth banquet, that our trusted experts and leaders are indifferent, or outright predators.
Below is the abstract from Eleni Papadopulos' 1999 peer-reviewed paper, "A Critical Analysis of the Pharmacology of AZT and its Use in AIDS". The data available by 1999 show that AZT could never have worked as an anti-HIV agent. Hence its effects are confined to toxicities. John Lauritsen's epithet, "Poison by Prescription", is apt.
ABSTRACT
The triphosphorylated form of the nucleoside analogue 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine
(Zidovudine, AZT) is claimed to interrupt the HIV replication cycle by a selective inhibition
of viral reverse transcriptase, thereby preventing the formation of new proviral
DNA in permissive, uninfected cells.
Given that initial HIV infection of an individual instigates abundant HIV replication from inception until death, and that the life of infected T-cells is only several days, the administration of AZT should lead both in vitro and in vivo (i) to decreased formation of proviral DNA; and thus (ii) to decreased frequencies of ‘HIV isolation’ (detection of p24 or reverse transcription or both) in stimulated cultures/cocultures of T-cells from seropositive individuals; (iii) to decreased synthesis of HIV p24 and RNA (‘antigenaemia’, ‘plasma viraemia’, ‘viral load’) ultimately
resulting in low or absent levels of all three parameters; and (iv) to a perfect and
direct correlation between all these parameters.
A critical analysis of the presently available data shows that no such evidence exists, an outcome not unexpected given the pharmacological data on AZT. HIV experts all agree that only the triphosphorylated form of AZT (AZTTP) and not the unphosphorylated form administered to patients, nor its mono- or diphosphate, is the active agent. Furthermore, the mechanism of action is the ability of AZTTP to halt the formation of HIV-DNA (chain termination). However, although this claim was posited from the outset, AZT underwent clinical trials and was introduced as a specific anti-HIV drug many years before there were any data proving that the cells of patients are able to triphosphorylate the parent compound to a level considered sufficient for its putative pharmacological action.
Notwithstanding, from the evidence published since 1991 it has become apparent that no such phosphorylation takes place and thus AZT cannot possess an anti-HIV effect. However, the scientific literature does elucidate: (i) a number of biochemical mechanisms which predicate the likelihood of widespread, serious toxicity from use of this drug; (ii) in vitro data proving that AZT has significant antibacterial and antiviral properties which confound interpretation of its effects when administered to patients. Based on all these data it is difficult if not impossible to explain why AZT was introduced and still remains [in 1999] the most widely recommended and used anti-HIV drug.
"Benzene, Lubricants and Aids" In this 12 page research document that my late benzene damaged wife found in her research is its on chapter in the book i wrote about what benzene did to my late , beautiful benzene damaged wife no one in medicine knew how to fix. Visit Vactruth.org or get my book to read the details of what we learned. Benzene was intentionally placed in gay men's lubricants that produces the same exact symptoms as the Aids virus. Intentionally placed into ladies feminine products under the names of paraBENS, same benzene in the evil known as Agent Orange that had a double dose of benzene in it! With all the chemistry in faucci's background he had to know this about benzene! The victims who had the symptoms but no virus and were still given AZT which did all kind of horrors to soooo many was because they had benzene poisoning. Benzene has been known to cause cancer and diabetes since the 1890's and still rockefeller and company brought this cheap solvent to us all and today is found in soooo many places and put there quietly! Benzene is a by-product of the crude oil refining process that some evil bastard found mixes well in the formulations of soo many 'thing s toxic', like gasoline, diesel, kerosene, aviation fuels, paints/lacquers/ thinners, food preservative, dyes, glues, inks, explosives, meds., vaccines, children's BENadrill, this is a short list! When monsatan got the no bid contract tp produce a de-folient to become Agent Orange, they started with a dioxin base that already had benzene in it and to make it into AO, all they did was add more benzene. Many of the big chemical company's got a piece of this action!
Jon Rappoport has been harping on the AIDS and AZT farce for years. I think he wrote a book about it.
No evidence AZT is toxic? Wow, what Alice in Wonderland world do they live in? Besides, in order for AZT to have 'anti-retroviral' properties, it needs to be tri-phosphorylated by cellular enzymes in order to have the supposed DNA chain terminating property. There was pharmicokinetic research looking at this way back in the day, and I think all but one of the papers showed that this tri-phosphorylation process took place by at least an order of magnitude or two below the threshold necessary for this ARV effect to happen. So instead, AZT was just a potent oxidizing agent that degraded the cells and killed people.
Recently I stumbled on a video about the early MTV reality personality Pedro Zamora. I remember seeing him on the show now and then. He died of 'AIDS' in 1994, having been 'diagnosed' with 'HIV' when he was 17 around 1989 after having donated blood. So what drug would he have been put on? AZT and DDI. He wasn't sick and had no idea he had 'HIV' until he was notified after donating blood. It just angers me, because he was killed by these drugs, but now he's a poster child for the whole AIDS paradigm. It's disgusting.
OMG my husband and I talked about him just a couple days ago! It definitely sounds like he was killed with the drugs because it happened WAY fast. He went from healthy to having cryptosporidium I think within months. Super suspicious. Very sad for him.
I think Woody is surprisingly cogent for an actor.
I’ve always gotten a good vibe from him. He’s smarter than he seems. I haven’t watched the whole Rogan interview yet but I will this weekend.
I remember Pedro as well. His T cell count was featured in the show as it kept going down. God bless 🙏🏻🙏🏻
AZT is definitely one of these key "naked emperor" cognitive dissonance knots in the narrative tapestry. "Everyone knows" AZT is toxic and was a bad move, "but..." -- and then emotional reflexes hit the brakes before the runaway train of logical reasoning gets started and takes a person beyond the Big Lie(s) into the desert of the real.
It's easier to defend and justify errors (and crimes) a la carte than to embrace the full scary truth banquet, that our trusted experts and leaders are indifferent, or outright predators.
Below is the abstract from Eleni Papadopulos' 1999 peer-reviewed paper, "A Critical Analysis of the Pharmacology of AZT and its Use in AIDS". The data available by 1999 show that AZT could never have worked as an anti-HIV agent. Hence its effects are confined to toxicities. John Lauritsen's epithet, "Poison by Prescription", is apt.
ABSTRACT
The triphosphorylated form of the nucleoside analogue 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine
(Zidovudine, AZT) is claimed to interrupt the HIV replication cycle by a selective inhibition
of viral reverse transcriptase, thereby preventing the formation of new proviral
DNA in permissive, uninfected cells.
Given that initial HIV infection of an individual instigates abundant HIV replication from inception until death, and that the life of infected T-cells is only several days, the administration of AZT should lead both in vitro and in vivo (i) to decreased formation of proviral DNA; and thus (ii) to decreased frequencies of ‘HIV isolation’ (detection of p24 or reverse transcription or both) in stimulated cultures/cocultures of T-cells from seropositive individuals; (iii) to decreased synthesis of HIV p24 and RNA (‘antigenaemia’, ‘plasma viraemia’, ‘viral load’) ultimately
resulting in low or absent levels of all three parameters; and (iv) to a perfect and
direct correlation between all these parameters.
A critical analysis of the presently available data shows that no such evidence exists, an outcome not unexpected given the pharmacological data on AZT. HIV experts all agree that only the triphosphorylated form of AZT (AZTTP) and not the unphosphorylated form administered to patients, nor its mono- or diphosphate, is the active agent. Furthermore, the mechanism of action is the ability of AZTTP to halt the formation of HIV-DNA (chain termination). However, although this claim was posited from the outset, AZT underwent clinical trials and was introduced as a specific anti-HIV drug many years before there were any data proving that the cells of patients are able to triphosphorylate the parent compound to a level considered sufficient for its putative pharmacological action.
Notwithstanding, from the evidence published since 1991 it has become apparent that no such phosphorylation takes place and thus AZT cannot possess an anti-HIV effect. However, the scientific literature does elucidate: (i) a number of biochemical mechanisms which predicate the likelihood of widespread, serious toxicity from use of this drug; (ii) in vitro data proving that AZT has significant antibacterial and antiviral properties which confound interpretation of its effects when administered to patients. Based on all these data it is difficult if not impossible to explain why AZT was introduced and still remains [in 1999] the most widely recommended and used anti-HIV drug.
Full text at https://www.theperthgroup.com/SCIPAPERS/AZTCMRO1999.pdf
Poison by Prescription
https://paganpressbooks.com/jpl/POISON.PDF
I'm pretty sure they're not using AZT anymore.
It's in Atripla, which is still on the market. I don't think it's super popular.
Might as well Google it, huh?
"Benzene, Lubricants and Aids" In this 12 page research document that my late benzene damaged wife found in her research is its on chapter in the book i wrote about what benzene did to my late , beautiful benzene damaged wife no one in medicine knew how to fix. Visit Vactruth.org or get my book to read the details of what we learned. Benzene was intentionally placed in gay men's lubricants that produces the same exact symptoms as the Aids virus. Intentionally placed into ladies feminine products under the names of paraBENS, same benzene in the evil known as Agent Orange that had a double dose of benzene in it! With all the chemistry in faucci's background he had to know this about benzene! The victims who had the symptoms but no virus and were still given AZT which did all kind of horrors to soooo many was because they had benzene poisoning. Benzene has been known to cause cancer and diabetes since the 1890's and still rockefeller and company brought this cheap solvent to us all and today is found in soooo many places and put there quietly! Benzene is a by-product of the crude oil refining process that some evil bastard found mixes well in the formulations of soo many 'thing s toxic', like gasoline, diesel, kerosene, aviation fuels, paints/lacquers/ thinners, food preservative, dyes, glues, inks, explosives, meds., vaccines, children's BENadrill, this is a short list! When monsatan got the no bid contract tp produce a de-folient to become Agent Orange, they started with a dioxin base that already had benzene in it and to make it into AO, all they did was add more benzene. Many of the big chemical company's got a piece of this action!
90 days -- that was the life expectancy once AZT was commenced.