More celebrities critical of AZT
Woody Harrelson on Joe Rogan
This will be a very short post, but I wanted to alert you to the following article in Pink News and the podcast discussed therein:
‘Ignorant’ Woody Harrelson criticised for comments about HIV drug on Joe Rogan podcast
Apparently, Harrelson is no fan of Fauci, referring to him in the podcast as “extraordinarily evil.”
To watch the full podcast, just click below.
He then went scorched earth on AZT:
Appearing on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Saturday (22 February), Harrelson said he believed azidothymidine (AZT), the first antiretroviral medication used in the battle against HIV/Aids, was “highly toxic” and that Fauci was wrong to distribute it.
[…]
However, Venom star Harrelson claimed: “AZT was known to be a highly toxic, really ineffective drug, and of course, that was the one they picked.
“They started using that again, and I don’t know how many people got killed.
“That killed friends of mine. AZT was very toxic and they finally had to yank it. Now they use different chemical cocktails but Fauci did some extraordinarily evil s**t.”
I love the way the article itself has to specify that “Debates over its effectiveness have continued but there is no evidence to suggest it was toxic.” No evidence? Really?
How exactly was Harrelson criticized for his views on AZT? Well, here are two reactions:
Those who lived through the height of the Aids scare were quick to criticise Harrelson, with one user saying AZT “was all we had [and] it kept a lot of people alive for a lot longer than they would otherwise have had”.
And further: “‘Joe Rogan and Woody Harrelson exhibit a wilful, belligerent ignorance I find hard to comprehend. It’s like they love being stupid – and wrong.’” Um… okay? Talk about ad hominem.
That’s pretty much the entire article, but I’m encouraged to see public figures such as Woody Harrelson, Aaron Rodgers, Bret Weinstein, and others begin to question AZT and—should they follow the rabbit trail to its logical end—eventually question the entire HIV AIDS story. I sense a sea change coming—what think you?
Jon Rappoport has been harping on the AIDS and AZT farce for years. I think he wrote a book about it.
No evidence AZT is toxic? Wow, what Alice in Wonderland world do they live in? Besides, in order for AZT to have 'anti-retroviral' properties, it needs to be tri-phosphorylated by cellular enzymes in order to have the supposed DNA chain terminating property. There was pharmicokinetic research looking at this way back in the day, and I think all but one of the papers showed that this tri-phosphorylation process took place by at least an order of magnitude or two below the threshold necessary for this ARV effect to happen. So instead, AZT was just a potent oxidizing agent that degraded the cells and killed people.
Recently I stumbled on a video about the early MTV reality personality Pedro Zamora. I remember seeing him on the show now and then. He died of 'AIDS' in 1994, having been 'diagnosed' with 'HIV' when he was 17 around 1989 after having donated blood. So what drug would he have been put on? AZT and DDI. He wasn't sick and had no idea he had 'HIV' until he was notified after donating blood. It just angers me, because he was killed by these drugs, but now he's a poster child for the whole AIDS paradigm. It's disgusting.