5 Comments
Apr 20Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

I left a comment on her Duesberg vs Perth comment, "As if scientists are only allowed to believe one thing and never disagree."

Expand full comment
author

Did she block you? I’m really curious.

BTW - this next comment is not directed at you specifically, but the reason I posted this was not to be catty, but because NO ONE is willing to debate this anymore (or ever, so as a result we have forty years of BS and unimaginable suffering that has occurred) or to answer questions. I’d love to see that change.

Expand full comment
Apr 20Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

Not yet. By the way, the BMJ Perth Group debate, if you've read (or rather slogged through) that long long debate, I actually am one of the participants in it. I actually debated along side the PG, my name is Christopher in that if you get a chance to look it up. I lament because if Eleni wasn't able to make a dent against the protagonists, I don't know who can. But, she got Brian Foley to admit the evidence for HIV isolation was lacking. I think Covid was in a way the thing that needed to happen to start waking people up.

Expand full comment
Apr 19·edited Apr 19Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

I've never been on Twitter or X, so I hope one of your other followers will challenge her! Oh, and props to Aaron Rodgers for questioning the HIV orthodoxy. I believe he questioned the covid vax, too, and has even raised doubts about the official 9/11 narrative. Shows he has a brain and is willing to use it ;-)

Expand full comment

Ha! Perhaps, "science communicator" is a polite version of "scientifically illiterate." Hearing of "scientists" blocking scientific challenges reminds me of the Planet of the Apes scene in which the 3 orangutan "Doctors" do their see no/hear no/say no schtick when confronted with conflicting scientific evidence.

Expand full comment