Dr William Makis, an oncologist in Canada, is making huge strides in cancer treatment. He has a substack, check him out, he has hundreds of testimonials of people who have beat cancer.
I've actually wondered a lot about this. When we hear the phrase, 'lost their battle with cancer', I always wonder if that's a euphamistic phrase for 'the chemo killed them'.
I need to look further into the statistics, but I strongly suspect that the only situation in which chemo *might* be beneficial would be something like leukemia. It’s too difficult to target discrete tumors with generalized poison.
I follow a doctor who insists that chemo raises your risk of recurrent cancer. It basically poisons the body, and he believes cancer is a response to long term toxicity, in which case adding to the body's burden of toxicity isn't good.
An acquaintance had a double mastectomy after a mammogram revealed a tumor "so small they were lucky they caught it." She had asked for the mammogram at a routine well check-up; not because of any discomfort or symptoms- but because "it had been awhile". The messaging that early detection is crucial is VERY ingrained in most people I know. I get berated by relatives all the time for not getting any regular medical testing.
I don’t want to “like” this—I’m sorry about your friend. My immediate family’s approach to public health measures is in line with my own, but my in laws like to drop hints about mammograms and colonoscopies.
I am under the opinion that the medical community has been headed down the wrong path in regards to cancer and the the very expensive invasive treatment of it. I was given a diagnosis back in 2011 with invasive ductal carcinoma. I chose to treat my cancer by means of revamping my diet and lifestyle. I worked with an oncologist out of Standford to monitor my progress. It took about a year before the cancer tumor was completely gone (monitored by ultrasound). I highly recommend Andreas Moritz book "Cancer Is Not a Disease - It's a Healing Mechanism". Until we have a clear understanding of what the issue is, it is really difficult to apply the proper solution!
Something else I was thinking about, since the article mentioned prostate and PSA test. I don't know if you've heard this, but the scientist who invented the PSA test, or discovered the antigen, has since been a big critic of its use in diagnostics. I listened to an interview with him a few years ago, and he basically says it's not really capable of accurately diagnosing prostate cancer. But of course, the PSA is run all the time on men.
I think we lost "the forest from the trees" long ago. In the early 20th century, Dr. Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize for making a number of findings about cancer cells. (1) their preferred fuel is sugar/glucose; (2) they thrive best in a slightly lower than normal level of oxygen; (3) they thrive best in a slightly higher acidic environment than normal. Guess what provides those three things?
Eating too close to sundown - which results in "excess circulating glucose" (ECG) which causes inflammation, first to the ONE-CELL-THIN endothelial lining of all blood vessels and can then spread to surrounding organs, tissues, muscles, and (sorry) the Brain - which is not protected from "inflammation coming via the blood". So late eating provides the ECG and the inflamed endothelial lining of all blood impedes the exchange of oxygen from lungs to blood and from blood to tissue. And impedes the exchange of waste products including CO2 from tissues to blood and out the lungs or wherever else the waste products are delivered (Lymph?). So LESS OXYGEN and MORE ACIDITY.
Why? As the sun sets, the body starts producing melatonin for sleep. The pancreas recognizes the increasing melatonin levels in the blood so it's starts a shutdown process. So after sundown the pancreas does not release insulin to address any ECG. It's asleep. God's design folks. Don't argue with Him or "sin" against his design. That ECG is not remove until almost an hour AFTER awakening AND being exposed to light - sunlight is ideal. The body realizes "It's morning" and starts to remove the melatonin, then the pancreas notices the lowering levels and starts releasing insulin. That whole process after awakening and exposure to light takes almost an hour. HOWEVER that just stops the ECG causing the inflammation, that doesn't address/heal the inflammation all thru the night.
So if I had cancer, first I wouldn't trust the diagnosis in these times of bioweapon COVID, fraud CRP tests and forced vaccines that kill people - and I would ask for a C-Reactive Protein (CRP) test to see what my "whole body" inflammation level is especially first thing in the AM before eating. In 2018 (age 66) mine was over 10 where "normal" in America is "1 to 3". Optimum is <1. After I followed the science of Dr. Satchin Panda (salk inst) in early 2018, after a year or so I asked for another CRP test and it was well below 1 - the "Optimum Range." The lab said they had never seen such a low number (not surprising in very ill America - with sugar an addiction; late eating promoted prolifically as though "normal" and "family time"(more like family suicide); .... and cancer still on the rise.
BELOW is Dr. Panda's 2016 video of great importance - on how bad eating too late is. NOTE, meat takes 6 hours to digest on an empty stomach so a steak, say, at 1PM isn't digested until 7PM and it results in ECG. Manage your day so as to manage whether you have ECG AT SUNSET.
Guess who also talked about this LONG ago? Jesus Christ, as documented in the little known ancient papyrus documents (2 of them) "The Essene Gospel of Peace." Its on the internet. Christ said the first meal "is with the sun at its highest" (eating relative to the sun's position). And the second/final meal is "with the setting of the sun". Note Christ advocated vegetarian thus it would be low in raising glucose.
What else promotes low oxygen - wearing a mask; staying indoors, eating free donuts or fast food....Wasn't that they were promoting during COVID. Now "you know the thing."
Let's stop swamping ourselves with "the science" - it's the Wizard of Oz now behind a curtain ringing bells, etc. and let's get back to Christ's basics - God's design - which was proven by Dr. Panda as very bad. He said "WHEN you eat is more important than WHAT you eat." That's how bad late eating is - as he said "turns even highly nutritious food into junk (inflammation)."
Intuitively, I would imagine that intense exercise should be protective because you intake so much oxygen. Signed, a workout freak with wishful thinking
Here's more to digest :) GOOD stuff. Intense exercise would consume a lot of oxygen but it would result in a lot of Carbon Dioxide and waste products like lactic acid - which is cancer's favorite environment. So I don't know how beneficial, if at all, that would net out to be for cancer. Instead.....
My top breathing recommendations are: (1) double-nasal-inhale breathing which is my preference; (2) and polyvagal humming; THey are both at this link:
Scroll to the woman in the brownish halter top (polyvagal) then the next video below is a man doing the double-inhale method. 2 minutes
I have used both with immediate incredible (unimaginable in my case) benefits.
My polyvagal humming initially was literally to say the word "hummmm" - inhale thru nose, say "hummm" while closing lips. Vibrates the nose/palate area. I did this for a total of 20 minutes. The next morning I clearly noticed increased flexibility in my neck which I very seriously injured playing football in 7th grade (landed ON my head with two lineman on my back - BROKE the helmet - was unconscious continuously for 5 hours, awoke BRIEFLY, then slept for almost 24 - then a week of a horrendous migraine.
Not taken to a doctor or a hospital (Deep South didn't trust doctors in my area.)
So for 60 years I had noticeable chronic/continuous tightness and lack of flexibility primarily to my (looking) left. After humming it was gone the next morning. So to test it further I played a round of golf where one turns the torso to the right (in effect a head turn to the left which restricted me all these years). No issues AND no set back. I have a new neck and a new golf game. I played more since.... . Three months later, my left turn is STILL better than my right turn after 60 years of the OPPOSITE.
THe double-inhale is equally impressive and just as profound. As a lifetime runner I have always mouth-breathed and never could nasal breath while running hard. I went to an official cross-country 5K GRASS course that I have run many times over years. Not great footing and 5 muscle-burning hills - very tough climbing at pace. My breathing was IN thru the nose on the first and 2nd(quick) inhales then out via the mouth. As I started, since I had tried nasal breathing before I was certain I would have to quit well before finishing as I was running at race pace. Instead I ran one of my best times ever in recent years and with little training. My time of 24 min 20 seconds is to be contrasted with the National Masters (Runners) News Standards of Excellence which is 27:40 for a 5K - male ages 70-74. HOWEVER their standards are for a flat track!!
So the two nasal inhales appear to maximize the oxygen intake AND maximize the production/inhale of nitric oxide via the nasal passages - which is a relaxant of muscles - for the diaphram, legs, etc.. THe exhale via the mouth (larger opening) appears to maximize the removal of carbon dioxide - better use of diaphragm.
When the weather gets warmer I will more fully test this as I am VERY impressed after being a runner for nearly 65 years now - this IS different. As a PhD Statistician I want to do still more rigorous tests.
Let's have Christ have the final word. He said, in "The Essene Gospel of Peace" to use our Earth Mother's "Four Angels of Healing" which are: exposure to sunlight; exposure to air (He noted specifically around trees); immersion in water (which would be high mineral in those days from THe Dead Sea, Ocean, river, creek) ; and physical contact with the earth (earthing/grounding) which is also anti-inflammatory and healing.
Feel free to reply OR not reply. You are busier and doing much more important work than me. Take care.
This is a lot to digest but I’m stuck at the part about intense exercise—I hope they’re not saying what I think they’re saying! I’ve worked out hard for the past 35 years and I feel it’s been nothing but beneficial. Plus I need it for my stupid mental health.
I wouldn't worry about the intense exercise. At age 73 I am in perfect health and RUN VERY hard for 3 to 6 miles every week at least once - for decades. I would worry much more about when AND what I eat WHEN. That trumps everything. Meat at breakfast and lunch OK. Since protein triggers the mTOR pathway - cell replication/growth. Cancer can't survive in a more alkaline body. Nor can bacteria, viruses. I am never sick - 7 years now. A freak OF health.
Yeah, I was a very serious runner (competed at every distance up to marathon —I’m not crazy enough for an ultra) until I turned 40 and my knees decided they hated me. I still run with my husband a few miles a few times a week but my preferred form of exercise is (VERY) intense weight training and yoga. I also force myself to do the reverse escalator 2-3 days a week.
If you have a question at any time I am a wealth of knowledge and experience - in my big family a freak of health. Just reply to any Older and Wiser comments and I'll get an email notice. To your health. Keep up the outstanding work - the devolution of evil and a resolution to "my people perish from a lack of wisdom" - IS happening.
I’m intrigued by the breathing exercises. I will give them a try. In the fall, I had bronchitis (which I never get) and I’m convinced I got rid of it using breathing exercises.
My wife was diagnosed with "DCIS" (whatever the hell that is) in 2015. She had surgery, and then opted for radiation. I did not want her to do the radiation, but she is fully bought in to the scientism of allopathic medicine so she just did it. I can honestly say that her overall health has declined immensely since that time, and especially so since 2020, probably because she has taken multiple "COVID" jabs (whatever the hell those are).
I’m sorry you’re dealing with this, and that you and your wife disagree on this. I’m inferring from your post that she didn’t do chemo, which if that’s the case, thank God. My husband is much more trusting of conventional medicine than I am (although we mostly agree & we’re certainly on the same page regarding “HIV”)—I don’t know what he’d do if I refused chemotherapy- hopefully I’ll never have to answer that question), so I can imagine that there is some tension there. Best wishes to both of you and for her health & healthy communication regarding these issues. 💚
Yes, there is tension regarding this issue, among others. But I love her as she has been there for me in many other ways. But even before 2020, I was skeptical of allopathic medicine, and skeptical of accepted materialist-only "scientific" explanations for everything that ails us, including our spiritual-existential concerns. Like you (and people like Celia Farber), I have always been dubious about the accepted and heavily-pushed "HIV" narrative. However, after 2020, I simply cannot view "science" as anything more than a spiritually wayward (intentionally for some, unintentionally for others) lust for power and control. The materialist-only "scientific" narrative also seems to me heavily tied into whatever is happening with "immigration" where I live as the entire bio-medical technocratic control grid is being set up by "immigrants" from the Sino-sphere and Hindu-sphere (China and India) where I live and in much of the West. I don't know your thoughts on that. But to me, it's very obvious that there is also an anti-Christian, anti lower middle class (and middle class) "white" agenda at play here. San Diego has literally become Canada overnight (demographically now like Vancouver or Toronto), slowly after 9/11, but rapidly after 2020. And every single "immigrant" from the Sino and Hindu sphere is immediately working to implement the digital surveillance hellscape, and being paid handsomely to do so.
I've been looking into this recently Dr lee Merritt says parasites in the body are the actual cause of it. I think there may be some truth to that, also the chemotherapy is another reason why people die of it.
If you check out the top comment about Dr Makis substack, he has some information that seems to support this hypothesis. I need to look into this further, but there are MANY cases of people clearing stage 4 cancer using massive doses of anti parasitic medications. This may not be the full answer, but it is clear indication that our model for cancer is DEAD WRONG.
Not being male, I don’t know about this, but you may be right. I know they recently decreased the frequency of PAP smears for women to every third year. It’s really the yearly mammography that seems insane to me, unless you have a STRONG family history.
And even then, why not just do ultrasound? Most abnormal mammograms trigger an ultrasound, so why not start with that? It’s perhaps not totally risk free, but it’s sure better than yearly irradiation.
Thanks for raising this topic, Rebecca. Are you familiar with Peter Duesberg's extensive research on cancer, which he conducted after he was banished from the HIV/AIDS field? Aneuploidy is the relevant concept he talks about, I believe, but I don't really know anything about it. Harvey Bialy's scientific biography of Duesberg, "Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS" is on my stack of books waiting to be read. Are you interested in looking into this??
Dr William Makis, an oncologist in Canada, is making huge strides in cancer treatment. He has a substack, check him out, he has hundreds of testimonials of people who have beat cancer.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-157609576?source=queue
Thanks mom! 💚
I've actually wondered a lot about this. When we hear the phrase, 'lost their battle with cancer', I always wonder if that's a euphamistic phrase for 'the chemo killed them'.
Yup. I’ve even noticed in TV and movies, when a character “dies of cancer,” they usually succumb to some infection. Interesting.
I need to look further into the statistics, but I strongly suspect that the only situation in which chemo *might* be beneficial would be something like leukemia. It’s too difficult to target discrete tumors with generalized poison.
It’s like shooting a firehose at a mosquito, and I am sure this is not an original thought on my part. Lot of collateral damage.
I follow a doctor who insists that chemo raises your risk of recurrent cancer. It basically poisons the body, and he believes cancer is a response to long term toxicity, in which case adding to the body's burden of toxicity isn't good.
That’s fascinating- care to share his site?
An acquaintance had a double mastectomy after a mammogram revealed a tumor "so small they were lucky they caught it." She had asked for the mammogram at a routine well check-up; not because of any discomfort or symptoms- but because "it had been awhile". The messaging that early detection is crucial is VERY ingrained in most people I know. I get berated by relatives all the time for not getting any regular medical testing.
I don’t want to “like” this—I’m sorry about your friend. My immediate family’s approach to public health measures is in line with my own, but my in laws like to drop hints about mammograms and colonoscopies.
I am under the opinion that the medical community has been headed down the wrong path in regards to cancer and the the very expensive invasive treatment of it. I was given a diagnosis back in 2011 with invasive ductal carcinoma. I chose to treat my cancer by means of revamping my diet and lifestyle. I worked with an oncologist out of Standford to monitor my progress. It took about a year before the cancer tumor was completely gone (monitored by ultrasound). I highly recommend Andreas Moritz book "Cancer Is Not a Disease - It's a Healing Mechanism". Until we have a clear understanding of what the issue is, it is really difficult to apply the proper solution!
I’m so happy for your positive results! That’s wonderful! To your health.
I think cancer needs to be reconceptuallzed from scratch.
https://raypeat.com/articles/articles/cancer-disorder-energy.shtml
I’m getting closer and closer to this belief myself. Clearly, what we’re doing isn’t working.
Something else I was thinking about, since the article mentioned prostate and PSA test. I don't know if you've heard this, but the scientist who invented the PSA test, or discovered the antigen, has since been a big critic of its use in diagnostics. I listened to an interview with him a few years ago, and he basically says it's not really capable of accurately diagnosing prostate cancer. But of course, the PSA is run all the time on men.
Speaking of Mullis, I’ll be doing a livestream reviewing his book. If you haven’t read it, it is HIGHLY entertaining & informative.
Shades of Kary Mullis and PCR. I’d be interested to learn more about this.
I think we lost "the forest from the trees" long ago. In the early 20th century, Dr. Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize for making a number of findings about cancer cells. (1) their preferred fuel is sugar/glucose; (2) they thrive best in a slightly lower than normal level of oxygen; (3) they thrive best in a slightly higher acidic environment than normal. Guess what provides those three things?
Eating too close to sundown - which results in "excess circulating glucose" (ECG) which causes inflammation, first to the ONE-CELL-THIN endothelial lining of all blood vessels and can then spread to surrounding organs, tissues, muscles, and (sorry) the Brain - which is not protected from "inflammation coming via the blood". So late eating provides the ECG and the inflamed endothelial lining of all blood impedes the exchange of oxygen from lungs to blood and from blood to tissue. And impedes the exchange of waste products including CO2 from tissues to blood and out the lungs or wherever else the waste products are delivered (Lymph?). So LESS OXYGEN and MORE ACIDITY.
Why? As the sun sets, the body starts producing melatonin for sleep. The pancreas recognizes the increasing melatonin levels in the blood so it's starts a shutdown process. So after sundown the pancreas does not release insulin to address any ECG. It's asleep. God's design folks. Don't argue with Him or "sin" against his design. That ECG is not remove until almost an hour AFTER awakening AND being exposed to light - sunlight is ideal. The body realizes "It's morning" and starts to remove the melatonin, then the pancreas notices the lowering levels and starts releasing insulin. That whole process after awakening and exposure to light takes almost an hour. HOWEVER that just stops the ECG causing the inflammation, that doesn't address/heal the inflammation all thru the night.
So if I had cancer, first I wouldn't trust the diagnosis in these times of bioweapon COVID, fraud CRP tests and forced vaccines that kill people - and I would ask for a C-Reactive Protein (CRP) test to see what my "whole body" inflammation level is especially first thing in the AM before eating. In 2018 (age 66) mine was over 10 where "normal" in America is "1 to 3". Optimum is <1. After I followed the science of Dr. Satchin Panda (salk inst) in early 2018, after a year or so I asked for another CRP test and it was well below 1 - the "Optimum Range." The lab said they had never seen such a low number (not surprising in very ill America - with sugar an addiction; late eating promoted prolifically as though "normal" and "family time"(more like family suicide); .... and cancer still on the rise.
BELOW is Dr. Panda's 2016 video of great importance - on how bad eating too late is. NOTE, meat takes 6 hours to digest on an empty stomach so a steak, say, at 1PM isn't digested until 7PM and it results in ECG. Manage your day so as to manage whether you have ECG AT SUNSET.
https://www.foundmyfitness.com/episodes/satchin-panda <<<<
Guess who also talked about this LONG ago? Jesus Christ, as documented in the little known ancient papyrus documents (2 of them) "The Essene Gospel of Peace." Its on the internet. Christ said the first meal "is with the sun at its highest" (eating relative to the sun's position). And the second/final meal is "with the setting of the sun". Note Christ advocated vegetarian thus it would be low in raising glucose.
What else promotes low oxygen - wearing a mask; staying indoors, eating free donuts or fast food....Wasn't that they were promoting during COVID. Now "you know the thing."
Let's stop swamping ourselves with "the science" - it's the Wizard of Oz now behind a curtain ringing bells, etc. and let's get back to Christ's basics - God's design - which was proven by Dr. Panda as very bad. He said "WHEN you eat is more important than WHAT you eat." That's how bad late eating is - as he said "turns even highly nutritious food into junk (inflammation)."
TO your health...
Intuitively, I would imagine that intense exercise should be protective because you intake so much oxygen. Signed, a workout freak with wishful thinking
Thanks for this very interesting comment! I’m going to need to read it again to fully digest. 😇
Here's more to digest :) GOOD stuff. Intense exercise would consume a lot of oxygen but it would result in a lot of Carbon Dioxide and waste products like lactic acid - which is cancer's favorite environment. So I don't know how beneficial, if at all, that would net out to be for cancer. Instead.....
My top breathing recommendations are: (1) double-nasal-inhale breathing which is my preference; (2) and polyvagal humming; THey are both at this link:
https://x.com/IamProHuman/status/1842213917402992937
Scroll to the woman in the brownish halter top (polyvagal) then the next video below is a man doing the double-inhale method. 2 minutes
I have used both with immediate incredible (unimaginable in my case) benefits.
My polyvagal humming initially was literally to say the word "hummmm" - inhale thru nose, say "hummm" while closing lips. Vibrates the nose/palate area. I did this for a total of 20 minutes. The next morning I clearly noticed increased flexibility in my neck which I very seriously injured playing football in 7th grade (landed ON my head with two lineman on my back - BROKE the helmet - was unconscious continuously for 5 hours, awoke BRIEFLY, then slept for almost 24 - then a week of a horrendous migraine.
Not taken to a doctor or a hospital (Deep South didn't trust doctors in my area.)
So for 60 years I had noticeable chronic/continuous tightness and lack of flexibility primarily to my (looking) left. After humming it was gone the next morning. So to test it further I played a round of golf where one turns the torso to the right (in effect a head turn to the left which restricted me all these years). No issues AND no set back. I have a new neck and a new golf game. I played more since.... . Three months later, my left turn is STILL better than my right turn after 60 years of the OPPOSITE.
THe double-inhale is equally impressive and just as profound. As a lifetime runner I have always mouth-breathed and never could nasal breath while running hard. I went to an official cross-country 5K GRASS course that I have run many times over years. Not great footing and 5 muscle-burning hills - very tough climbing at pace. My breathing was IN thru the nose on the first and 2nd(quick) inhales then out via the mouth. As I started, since I had tried nasal breathing before I was certain I would have to quit well before finishing as I was running at race pace. Instead I ran one of my best times ever in recent years and with little training. My time of 24 min 20 seconds is to be contrasted with the National Masters (Runners) News Standards of Excellence which is 27:40 for a 5K - male ages 70-74. HOWEVER their standards are for a flat track!!
So the two nasal inhales appear to maximize the oxygen intake AND maximize the production/inhale of nitric oxide via the nasal passages - which is a relaxant of muscles - for the diaphram, legs, etc.. THe exhale via the mouth (larger opening) appears to maximize the removal of carbon dioxide - better use of diaphragm.
When the weather gets warmer I will more fully test this as I am VERY impressed after being a runner for nearly 65 years now - this IS different. As a PhD Statistician I want to do still more rigorous tests.
Let's have Christ have the final word. He said, in "The Essene Gospel of Peace" to use our Earth Mother's "Four Angels of Healing" which are: exposure to sunlight; exposure to air (He noted specifically around trees); immersion in water (which would be high mineral in those days from THe Dead Sea, Ocean, river, creek) ; and physical contact with the earth (earthing/grounding) which is also anti-inflammatory and healing.
Feel free to reply OR not reply. You are busier and doing much more important work than me. Take care.
This is a lot to digest but I’m stuck at the part about intense exercise—I hope they’re not saying what I think they’re saying! I’ve worked out hard for the past 35 years and I feel it’s been nothing but beneficial. Plus I need it for my stupid mental health.
I wouldn't worry about the intense exercise. At age 73 I am in perfect health and RUN VERY hard for 3 to 6 miles every week at least once - for decades. I would worry much more about when AND what I eat WHEN. That trumps everything. Meat at breakfast and lunch OK. Since protein triggers the mTOR pathway - cell replication/growth. Cancer can't survive in a more alkaline body. Nor can bacteria, viruses. I am never sick - 7 years now. A freak OF health.
Yeah, I was a very serious runner (competed at every distance up to marathon —I’m not crazy enough for an ultra) until I turned 40 and my knees decided they hated me. I still run with my husband a few miles a few times a week but my preferred form of exercise is (VERY) intense weight training and yoga. I also force myself to do the reverse escalator 2-3 days a week.
If you have a question at any time I am a wealth of knowledge and experience - in my big family a freak of health. Just reply to any Older and Wiser comments and I'll get an email notice. To your health. Keep up the outstanding work - the devolution of evil and a resolution to "my people perish from a lack of wisdom" - IS happening.
I’m intrigued by the breathing exercises. I will give them a try. In the fall, I had bronchitis (which I never get) and I’m convinced I got rid of it using breathing exercises.
My wife was diagnosed with "DCIS" (whatever the hell that is) in 2015. She had surgery, and then opted for radiation. I did not want her to do the radiation, but she is fully bought in to the scientism of allopathic medicine so she just did it. I can honestly say that her overall health has declined immensely since that time, and especially so since 2020, probably because she has taken multiple "COVID" jabs (whatever the hell those are).
I’m sorry you’re dealing with this, and that you and your wife disagree on this. I’m inferring from your post that she didn’t do chemo, which if that’s the case, thank God. My husband is much more trusting of conventional medicine than I am (although we mostly agree & we’re certainly on the same page regarding “HIV”)—I don’t know what he’d do if I refused chemotherapy- hopefully I’ll never have to answer that question), so I can imagine that there is some tension there. Best wishes to both of you and for her health & healthy communication regarding these issues. 💚
Yes, there is tension regarding this issue, among others. But I love her as she has been there for me in many other ways. But even before 2020, I was skeptical of allopathic medicine, and skeptical of accepted materialist-only "scientific" explanations for everything that ails us, including our spiritual-existential concerns. Like you (and people like Celia Farber), I have always been dubious about the accepted and heavily-pushed "HIV" narrative. However, after 2020, I simply cannot view "science" as anything more than a spiritually wayward (intentionally for some, unintentionally for others) lust for power and control. The materialist-only "scientific" narrative also seems to me heavily tied into whatever is happening with "immigration" where I live as the entire bio-medical technocratic control grid is being set up by "immigrants" from the Sino-sphere and Hindu-sphere (China and India) where I live and in much of the West. I don't know your thoughts on that. But to me, it's very obvious that there is also an anti-Christian, anti lower middle class (and middle class) "white" agenda at play here. San Diego has literally become Canada overnight (demographically now like Vancouver or Toronto), slowly after 9/11, but rapidly after 2020. And every single "immigrant" from the Sino and Hindu sphere is immediately working to implement the digital surveillance hellscape, and being paid handsomely to do so.
I've been looking into this recently Dr lee Merritt says parasites in the body are the actual cause of it. I think there may be some truth to that, also the chemotherapy is another reason why people die of it.
If you check out the top comment about Dr Makis substack, he has some information that seems to support this hypothesis. I need to look into this further, but there are MANY cases of people clearing stage 4 cancer using massive doses of anti parasitic medications. This may not be the full answer, but it is clear indication that our model for cancer is DEAD WRONG.
I think they already stopped annual screening for PSA (males) and occult blood stool (>60 yrs), unless family history.
"If you don't take a temperature, you can't find a fever."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_House_of_God
Not being male, I don’t know about this, but you may be right. I know they recently decreased the frequency of PAP smears for women to every third year. It’s really the yearly mammography that seems insane to me, unless you have a STRONG family history.
And even then, why not just do ultrasound? Most abnormal mammograms trigger an ultrasound, so why not start with that? It’s perhaps not totally risk free, but it’s sure better than yearly irradiation.
Thermography is even better! Looks for temp=blood supply changes
I’ve never heard of that! I’ll check it out.
Thanks for raising this topic, Rebecca. Are you familiar with Peter Duesberg's extensive research on cancer, which he conducted after he was banished from the HIV/AIDS field? Aneuploidy is the relevant concept he talks about, I believe, but I don't really know anything about it. Harvey Bialy's scientific biography of Duesberg, "Oncogenes, Aneuploidy and AIDS" is on my stack of books waiting to be read. Are you interested in looking into this??