Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed watching this beautifully created science fiction story. It’s been 40 years since this scam started and supported by the multibillion dollar AIDS industry. And it doesn’t seem to end anytime soon.
Hmmm, it's an interesting digital art project. Some of the little pink thingies look like frogs! I can't imagine how anyone can take it seriously, especially since there isn't even a punch line or any indication of these "HIV cells" causing any harm to anything. Kind of hypnotic actually.
Wouldn't it just be easier for these "HIV" "enthusers" (my made-up word for people who are REALLY into this "virus" and promote the theory by any means necessary) to make a video of someone holding actual pictures of "HIV" produced with an electron microscope? Pictures verified by researchers from all over the world? 40+ years and still no actual proof, so we're down to cartoons of viruses. Ye gods!
And it is that simple. The methodologies and technologies to isolate organisms, their nucleic acid content and their associated proteins have been around for decades. I first began doing that work in the late 80's, separating out organisms, their DNA from the RNA (using a sucrose gradient,) and their proteins (using various purification resins.) However, that work all depends on having an organism to start with.
hypnosis for the masses. still no one believes it important to stop genetically engineering seeds and contaminating water digging ruthlessly into the flesh of the earth. scientists are dark arts wizards funded by anti nature left brain blinking cursors.
As a fan of 30's through 50s' movies, I never realized how many had medical/doctor themes in which unproven scientific hypotheses were presented as scientific fact. So, the hypnosis process has been ongoing for a century (at least.) When younger, I dutifully absorbed their propaganda- now, I find them unwatchable.
I especially love the dramatic strings music in the background. It's like bad modern art. Seriously though, this is why the average person can't seem to question virology, they believe that really smart scientists have discovered all this and it's literally true, not made-up fanciful claptrap. It's like being in the 12 or 13th century, and having a priest, who would have been the only literate person capable of reading Latin, explaining to the masses the 'truth' of the Bible and the nature of God. They told the people what their reality was just like virologists now tell us what supposedly infects out bodies.
Seriously though, all this does is supposedly demonstrate how 'HIV' infects, replicates and exits a cell. Where is the demonstration of how it supposedly destroys the immune system?
Also, yes — this was my original complaint that led me to question HIV AIDS. Where is the evidence for them depleting T cells, or a mechanism for this happening? Crickets.
Someone left a comment asking what it would have been like if social media had been around during early AIDS, if dissenting voices would have gotten more traction (like how questioning Covid is kinda allowed but HIV AIDS is the third rail). It’s intriguing to contemplate. I bet dissenting voices would have had more of a platform than they did pre Internet, if that makes sense.
It seems they are in the middle or at the end of a chain of transformations.
They start as B cells if I remember correctly. And they are some sort of stem cells before that.
And then there is (supposedly) several further specializations for T cells.
What if there is a confusion? What if T cells are meant to break? What if the functions the researchers attribute to them are not what is really happening?
They are not really looking inside the body, aren't they? They create stories, then they take samples (perhaps,) then they try to confirm their stories with very difficult to justify experiments, and in recent years they focus on computer simulations, like every other biological researcher. That's what the grant-publication racket has done to science.
There is a high chance that the science they've been developing refers to nothing.
I think it is pure fantasy based on conjecture built upon speculation wrapped in assumptions. The tragedy is that our medics of the future will be taught this nonsense and virtually none of them will even think to question its validity, but will simply believe that this has all been scientifically established. When did much of science turn into science fiction and why have so few even noticed?
Perhaps, not science fiction, but, certainly, nothing but science guesswork. As The Science of HIV website states: "Animations [...] were created by [...] Animation Lab [...] in collaboration with HIV researchers around the globe, and reflect current hypotheses on how HIV infects the human body."
It's the science journal publication game. Generate some data and then create a plausible story that might explain that data. This is not scientific discovery which begins with an hypothesis that is then experimentally tested and directly confirmed or refuted, it is fishing for data (typically indirect data) and then using that data to model some hypothesis which will pass the weak publication standards.
How many of these cartoons and animations have I participated in, knowing full well (though remaining unstated) that none of the information being represented has any scientific confirmation? This is standard practice. But the deception continues, because if scientists were to reveal the truth, they would all be out of a job.
And, I have sympathy for my former colleagues- but when the deception is used to inflict harm and tyranny on a population, as is now being done on a massive scale, it is time to abandon the deception and reveal the fiction that comprises the great majority of so-called scientific knowledge.
Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed watching this beautifully created science fiction story. It’s been 40 years since this scam started and supported by the multibillion dollar AIDS industry. And it doesn’t seem to end anytime soon.
Hmmm, it's an interesting digital art project. Some of the little pink thingies look like frogs! I can't imagine how anyone can take it seriously, especially since there isn't even a punch line or any indication of these "HIV cells" causing any harm to anything. Kind of hypnotic actually.
Wouldn't it just be easier for these "HIV" "enthusers" (my made-up word for people who are REALLY into this "virus" and promote the theory by any means necessary) to make a video of someone holding actual pictures of "HIV" produced with an electron microscope? Pictures verified by researchers from all over the world? 40+ years and still no actual proof, so we're down to cartoons of viruses. Ye gods!
I know, RIGHT??? It would be so simple.
And it is that simple. The methodologies and technologies to isolate organisms, their nucleic acid content and their associated proteins have been around for decades. I first began doing that work in the late 80's, separating out organisms, their DNA from the RNA (using a sucrose gradient,) and their proteins (using various purification resins.) However, that work all depends on having an organism to start with.
hypnosis for the masses. still no one believes it important to stop genetically engineering seeds and contaminating water digging ruthlessly into the flesh of the earth. scientists are dark arts wizards funded by anti nature left brain blinking cursors.
Yes!! I thought of hypnosis immediately!
As a fan of 30's through 50s' movies, I never realized how many had medical/doctor themes in which unproven scientific hypotheses were presented as scientific fact. So, the hypnosis process has been ongoing for a century (at least.) When younger, I dutifully absorbed their propaganda- now, I find them unwatchable.
I especially love the dramatic strings music in the background. It's like bad modern art. Seriously though, this is why the average person can't seem to question virology, they believe that really smart scientists have discovered all this and it's literally true, not made-up fanciful claptrap. It's like being in the 12 or 13th century, and having a priest, who would have been the only literate person capable of reading Latin, explaining to the masses the 'truth' of the Bible and the nature of God. They told the people what their reality was just like virologists now tell us what supposedly infects out bodies.
Seriously though, all this does is supposedly demonstrate how 'HIV' infects, replicates and exits a cell. Where is the demonstration of how it supposedly destroys the immune system?
Also, yes — this was my original complaint that led me to question HIV AIDS. Where is the evidence for them depleting T cells, or a mechanism for this happening? Crickets.
.
You thinking the CD4 depletion syndrome is a myth and that it's not reversed by the nucleoside analogues?
The entire thing is AI generated.
Someone left a comment asking what it would have been like if social media had been around during early AIDS, if dissenting voices would have gotten more traction (like how questioning Covid is kinda allowed but HIV AIDS is the third rail). It’s intriguing to contemplate. I bet dissenting voices would have had more of a platform than they did pre Internet, if that makes sense.
I'm more interested in the life cycle of T cells.
It seems they are in the middle or at the end of a chain of transformations.
They start as B cells if I remember correctly. And they are some sort of stem cells before that.
And then there is (supposedly) several further specializations for T cells.
What if there is a confusion? What if T cells are meant to break? What if the functions the researchers attribute to them are not what is really happening?
They are not really looking inside the body, aren't they? They create stories, then they take samples (perhaps,) then they try to confirm their stories with very difficult to justify experiments, and in recent years they focus on computer simulations, like every other biological researcher. That's what the grant-publication racket has done to science.
There is a high chance that the science they've been developing refers to nothing.
It's fun to watch, but what a waste!
“Comments are disabled.”
Perhaps your comment was a little too challenging for them, Rebecca.
What do I think?
I think it is pure fantasy based on conjecture built upon speculation wrapped in assumptions. The tragedy is that our medics of the future will be taught this nonsense and virtually none of them will even think to question its validity, but will simply believe that this has all been scientifically established. When did much of science turn into science fiction and why have so few even noticed?
Perhaps, not science fiction, but, certainly, nothing but science guesswork. As The Science of HIV website states: "Animations [...] were created by [...] Animation Lab [...] in collaboration with HIV researchers around the globe, and reflect current hypotheses on how HIV infects the human body."
It's the science journal publication game. Generate some data and then create a plausible story that might explain that data. This is not scientific discovery which begins with an hypothesis that is then experimentally tested and directly confirmed or refuted, it is fishing for data (typically indirect data) and then using that data to model some hypothesis which will pass the weak publication standards.
How many of these cartoons and animations have I participated in, knowing full well (though remaining unstated) that none of the information being represented has any scientific confirmation? This is standard practice. But the deception continues, because if scientists were to reveal the truth, they would all be out of a job.
And, I have sympathy for my former colleagues- but when the deception is used to inflict harm and tyranny on a population, as is now being done on a massive scale, it is time to abandon the deception and reveal the fiction that comprises the great majority of so-called scientific knowledge.
Tried to view to video however Venmo says its having trouble playing. I will try later. Rest assured that I do not believe in any kind of virus.
methinks it's propaganda
Narrator describes processes in terms of “is” and “are”, as if they’re facts.
Where’s the proof? Is this:
a. electron magnetic proof?; or
b. a cartoon video created and paid for by a pharmaceutical giant(s); a computer-generated hypothesis stated as fact?
I would say selection ‘b.’
I saw a video in you tube suggesting that scientists have found a way of removing HIV inside the cell
CGI science ahahahaah the future is so bright, that we must wear sunglasses to shade or blindfolded science 😂.