Weinstein knows about the HIV lie because he favorably reviewed Celia Farber's book on his podcast. Tucker knows about the HIV lie because he interviewed RFK Jr. about his Fauci book. Almost all of the reviews of the Fauci book didn't touch the AIDS chapters - and the reason is Goliath, or rather, the Intelligence agencies. People won't talk about AIDS because it's a conspiracy on the level of 9/11. If you really look closely, Duesberg was set-up as an example of what the intelligence agencies can do to you if you speak the truth. That's why "controlled opposition" red flags started to go up for me when I saw The Highwire and Tucker carefully avoid discussing HIV when talking about the Fauci book. Ron Unz's review of the Fauci book completely focused on the avoidance of the AIDS chapters in reviews. This is also why mainstream media completely ignored the Fauci book - it represents a real danger to AIDS falling apart if a critical mass of people are exposed to the idea that AIDS is not infectious.
There's this thing called the Overton Window where you can only get people to go so far - so I think Weinstein knows introducing the idea that AIDS was a psyop might go too far for Tucker's listeners - either that, or they pre-agreed about off-limits topics. The people most impacted by AIDS such as gay men also live the deepest in the propaganda matrix. They're going to recoil from Tucker. Other people who have critically embraced the Fauci book such as Jimmy Dore really aren't impacted by the HIV psyop, so they probably haven't brought it up out of apathy. That's why I thought the line in your book "our job is to make people care" was the finest passage in the book.
Today there are people like Anthony Whitfield rotting away in prison under a 178 year sentence due to an HIV criminal exposure conviction.
I said it in my post and I’ll repeat it here. It’s a huge red flag that all these supposedly critical thinkers that routinely criticize public health agencies and big pharma somehow think that, despite all the lies and obfuscations, HIV AIDS is somehow this huge glaring exception, that it was somehow the one time they got it right despite all the contradictions, bad drugs, bad policy, and so on. IT MAKES NO SENSE in a normal world.
Thank you for this excellent summary of the interview and for inserting the parallels to the HIV AIDS mass hysteria psy-op. During the first year of the covid psy-op, which I saw through right away, I came across Celia Farber's 2006 Harpers article, then Peter Duesberg's 1995 book and later your book, and that's what prompted me to question the false mainstream narrative on HIV, which I had previously accepted. And it all fell into place for me right away, realizing that HIV AIDS was the pilot project (or clinical trial, as you call it) for the grand pandemic project of 2020. We need to keep reminding everybody of that!
To answer your query, yes I recognized immediately in Covid all the propaganda, sanctimony and authoritarianism I discovered in the hiv/aids fraud over a decade ago, in all the detail you’ve cited.
This inflated deja vu -- AIDS writ large, Fauci-sm for the masses -- “inoculated” me against believing all the scary hype, and saved my life and health.
I was lucky, but I think my survival makes it incumbent on me to keep speaking out -- about hiv and covid alike -- and to keep trying to “inoculate” as many as will listen.
In this respect, your example and work is reassuring and inspiring.
One of the primary functions of celebrity dissidents, who BTW all went along with lockdowns, masks etc., is to suppress the stories and information of actual dissidents who have a 30 year history studying these fake pandemics.
This serves to neutralize widespread understanding of what drives the core concepts of these fake pandemics.
Another function of these celebrity dissidents is to establish the "acceptable limits" of dissent. Anything that is outside of this narrow range of discussion is now seen to be off-limits- kept off the radar.
Such a "dissident dream team" does not challenge the biosecurity status quo in fact they embrace and preserve the ideological framework of the pandemic preparedness industry.
While some of these individuals who have stepped in as self-appointed members of this "dream team" may have fallen into these positions as a natural outcome of their professional or ideological leanings it would be naive to think this is the case for all of them, especially for the most prominent of them.
'It remains unclear why a retroviral cause was assumed' - have you not read 'And The Band Played On?' Don Francis decided very early that a retrovirus was to blame. He told Max Essex, he controlled Jim Curran (the head of the CDC AIDS Task Force), and together they twisted Gallo's arm. AIDS was immune system burn out caused by: too many STIs (Gays), too many shared needles (IVDUs) and too many factor 8 infusions (haemophiacs). At the centre of all these different cases was CMV, a fatal virus in the wrong circumstance, which for two decades had been associated with PCP and toxo and for a decade with KS. 'AIDS' in transplant patients had been seen for 20 years before 1981. In 1959 David Carr died of CMV/PCP infections.
Weinstein knows about the HIV lie because he favorably reviewed Celia Farber's book on his podcast. Tucker knows about the HIV lie because he interviewed RFK Jr. about his Fauci book. Almost all of the reviews of the Fauci book didn't touch the AIDS chapters - and the reason is Goliath, or rather, the Intelligence agencies. People won't talk about AIDS because it's a conspiracy on the level of 9/11. If you really look closely, Duesberg was set-up as an example of what the intelligence agencies can do to you if you speak the truth. That's why "controlled opposition" red flags started to go up for me when I saw The Highwire and Tucker carefully avoid discussing HIV when talking about the Fauci book. Ron Unz's review of the Fauci book completely focused on the avoidance of the AIDS chapters in reviews. This is also why mainstream media completely ignored the Fauci book - it represents a real danger to AIDS falling apart if a critical mass of people are exposed to the idea that AIDS is not infectious.
There's this thing called the Overton Window where you can only get people to go so far - so I think Weinstein knows introducing the idea that AIDS was a psyop might go too far for Tucker's listeners - either that, or they pre-agreed about off-limits topics. The people most impacted by AIDS such as gay men also live the deepest in the propaganda matrix. They're going to recoil from Tucker. Other people who have critically embraced the Fauci book such as Jimmy Dore really aren't impacted by the HIV psyop, so they probably haven't brought it up out of apathy. That's why I thought the line in your book "our job is to make people care" was the finest passage in the book.
Today there are people like Anthony Whitfield rotting away in prison under a 178 year sentence due to an HIV criminal exposure conviction.
I said it in my post and I’ll repeat it here. It’s a huge red flag that all these supposedly critical thinkers that routinely criticize public health agencies and big pharma somehow think that, despite all the lies and obfuscations, HIV AIDS is somehow this huge glaring exception, that it was somehow the one time they got it right despite all the contradictions, bad drugs, bad policy, and so on. IT MAKES NO SENSE in a normal world.
Great comment. Sadly I agree for the most part. I won’t shut up though.
Oh and the “criminal exposure” cases make my blood absolutely boil.
From that interview, Weinstein looks like a conehead.
As for the virus coming from Wuhan, well, viruses don't exist so that hypothesis has a hole in it.
Weinstein is a fraud in a general sense but he must know about the virus controversy.
Misinformation propping up the narrative.
They don't platform people who get to the root of the fraud. Thanks for this report.
Thank you for this excellent summary of the interview and for inserting the parallels to the HIV AIDS mass hysteria psy-op. During the first year of the covid psy-op, which I saw through right away, I came across Celia Farber's 2006 Harpers article, then Peter Duesberg's 1995 book and later your book, and that's what prompted me to question the false mainstream narrative on HIV, which I had previously accepted. And it all fell into place for me right away, realizing that HIV AIDS was the pilot project (or clinical trial, as you call it) for the grand pandemic project of 2020. We need to keep reminding everybody of that!
Thank you! Yes, we need to repeat this until it get acknowledged.
Very informative, thank you.
To answer your query, yes I recognized immediately in Covid all the propaganda, sanctimony and authoritarianism I discovered in the hiv/aids fraud over a decade ago, in all the detail you’ve cited.
This inflated deja vu -- AIDS writ large, Fauci-sm for the masses -- “inoculated” me against believing all the scary hype, and saved my life and health.
I was lucky, but I think my survival makes it incumbent on me to keep speaking out -- about hiv and covid alike -- and to keep trying to “inoculate” as many as will listen.
In this respect, your example and work is reassuring and inspiring.
Thank you!
One of the primary functions of celebrity dissidents, who BTW all went along with lockdowns, masks etc., is to suppress the stories and information of actual dissidents who have a 30 year history studying these fake pandemics.
This serves to neutralize widespread understanding of what drives the core concepts of these fake pandemics.
Another function of these celebrity dissidents is to establish the "acceptable limits" of dissent. Anything that is outside of this narrow range of discussion is now seen to be off-limits- kept off the radar.
Such a "dissident dream team" does not challenge the biosecurity status quo in fact they embrace and preserve the ideological framework of the pandemic preparedness industry.
While some of these individuals who have stepped in as self-appointed members of this "dream team" may have fallen into these positions as a natural outcome of their professional or ideological leanings it would be naive to think this is the case for all of them, especially for the most prominent of them.
'It remains unclear why a retroviral cause was assumed' - have you not read 'And The Band Played On?' Don Francis decided very early that a retrovirus was to blame. He told Max Essex, he controlled Jim Curran (the head of the CDC AIDS Task Force), and together they twisted Gallo's arm. AIDS was immune system burn out caused by: too many STIs (Gays), too many shared needles (IVDUs) and too many factor 8 infusions (haemophiacs). At the centre of all these different cases was CMV, a fatal virus in the wrong circumstance, which for two decades had been associated with PCP and toxo and for a decade with KS. 'AIDS' in transplant patients had been seen for 20 years before 1981. In 1959 David Carr died of CMV/PCP infections.