What's fascinating to me is how our medical system looks at pharmaceuticals and classifies reactions as the drug's 'actions' and then everything else as 'side effects'. But they're all just effects of the drugs on the body. The classification of some as 'good' and others 'bad' is an artificial construct. It's slight of hand, and the HIV/AIDS paradigm takes full advantage of this. If you have bad 'side effects', well that's just the price you have to pay for being naughty and catching the 'virus'. It's literally like punishment for being 'bad'.
These law suites don't go far enough because they propagate and reinforce the idea that there's a 'good' thing they do (viral suppression), but darn it, they also have these bad things they do also. Those of us on the forefront of this knowledge realize that even the 'good' things (viral suppression), is most likely a negative also as it's messing with the body in a way that is unacknowledged by the scientific system. Because they're all 'effects', they're all bad.
Yes, nothing but toxicity issues. I worked in drug development for over 2 decades, and I can't point to a single drug that I would consider beneficial, but they ALL have toxicity. Ethics go out the window when drug development is one's livelihood.
Oddly, the arbitrariness of actions vs effects was acknowledged during some of the discourse around the covid vaccines.
I remember seeing discussions on Twitter and Reddit where people said that if you felt feverish afterwards (or fatigued or run down or headachy) then it was evidence that the drug was "working".
Most people didn't appear to see the irony in a drug which was ferociously marketed as an immune booster seemingly having immunosuppressive qualities.
Regarding TAF (‘good hiv drugs’) having the effect of raising levels of blood cholesterol, I wonder if Gilead Sci is somehow in bed with the cholesterol-making companies, too. Just a guess, but it would make (evil) sense to push people to get on drugs for life -hiv, statin drugs- and make perpetual mammon. And statins also evidently have unwanted effects, evidenced by the following studies. Will the webs of deception ever stop manufacturing? (said the fly to the spider).
What's fascinating to me is how our medical system looks at pharmaceuticals and classifies reactions as the drug's 'actions' and then everything else as 'side effects'. But they're all just effects of the drugs on the body. The classification of some as 'good' and others 'bad' is an artificial construct. It's slight of hand, and the HIV/AIDS paradigm takes full advantage of this. If you have bad 'side effects', well that's just the price you have to pay for being naughty and catching the 'virus'. It's literally like punishment for being 'bad'.
These law suites don't go far enough because they propagate and reinforce the idea that there's a 'good' thing they do (viral suppression), but darn it, they also have these bad things they do also. Those of us on the forefront of this knowledge realize that even the 'good' things (viral suppression), is most likely a negative also as it's messing with the body in a way that is unacknowledged by the scientific system. Because they're all 'effects', they're all bad.
Yes, nothing but toxicity issues. I worked in drug development for over 2 decades, and I can't point to a single drug that I would consider beneficial, but they ALL have toxicity. Ethics go out the window when drug development is one's livelihood.
Oddly, the arbitrariness of actions vs effects was acknowledged during some of the discourse around the covid vaccines.
I remember seeing discussions on Twitter and Reddit where people said that if you felt feverish afterwards (or fatigued or run down or headachy) then it was evidence that the drug was "working".
Most people didn't appear to see the irony in a drug which was ferociously marketed as an immune booster seemingly having immunosuppressive qualities.
Regarding TAF (‘good hiv drugs’) having the effect of raising levels of blood cholesterol, I wonder if Gilead Sci is somehow in bed with the cholesterol-making companies, too. Just a guess, but it would make (evil) sense to push people to get on drugs for life -hiv, statin drugs- and make perpetual mammon. And statins also evidently have unwanted effects, evidenced by the following studies. Will the webs of deception ever stop manufacturing? (said the fly to the spider).
https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/modern-diseases/dangers-of-statin-drugs-what-you-havent-been-told-about-popular-cholesterol-lowering-medicines/