If you read the end of this post, you’ll see that she didn’t report on the rape; she wrote an article calling Robby Soave (formerly of Reason) an “idiot” for doubting the story, which was later retracted.
Yeah, I agree with you. I think she did the right thing in the end. That doesn’t stop her from being wrong about “HIV”, but credit to her for admitting her mistake.
Thank you Rebecca, this post is well done! We need to be able to question everything! Maybe next you can tackle the phenomenon of “that story has been debunked.”
All the forces of evil depend on the contagion disease model, especially the virus contagion model, to implement their plans, whether pharma profiteers, digital ID/cbdc, or population control psychos- the whole authoritarian movement. Those forces understand that every dissenting voice must be squelched to effectively sustain a propaganda charade.
This propaganda campaign is not a recent development- it has been developing for over a century (with some fits and starts,) and is now close to achieving its goal. But most of that success was achieved largely out of sight of the general public. However, the events of 2020 revealed their whole damn plan, and we are resisting in various ways.
Turns out the greatest weakness of the contagion disease model, and especially the virus contagion model, is its complete lack of supporting scientific evidence. The scientific evidence, in fact, tells exactly the opposite story. AIDS was not a "syndrome," but, was instead a fabricated fake epidemic (callously implicating a single demographic as its source) created by designating 3 dozen different actual conditions or symptoms as a single disease.
And this blaming of a single demographic was intentional mal intent- as Dr. Kevin Corbett points out, why else would a patient diagnosed with tuberculosis suddenly be categorized as an "AIDS" case if that patient self-identified as homosexual? Are we to believe the perpetrators of this plan did not select gay men as the target of their malice because they considered gay men an easy target?
And, as we now know, HIV as the cause of this fabricated epidemic, was itself a non-scientific proclamation, and was never an actual scientifically isolated or characterized entity.
So, when a claimed scientist such as Anna Merlan (or her fellow propaganda shills) attack someone for revealing the fraud behind AIDS/HIV and the death and harm caused by its claimed "treatments," as Dr. Culshaw Smith is doing successfully, they are simply working to perpetuate a giant propaganda campaign on behalf of the forces of evil.
Thank you Rebecca. I really appreciate your taking on the task of critiquing her article. It can't have been fun to have to include all those vile quotes. And do let us know if she agrees to have a discussion with you in a public forum! (Not holding my breath....)
Why did Anna Merlan retract her rape stories? She should have just said: "the rape story mutated into a less virulent strain".
If you read the end of this post, you’ll see that she didn’t report on the rape; she wrote an article calling Robby Soave (formerly of Reason) an “idiot” for doubting the story, which was later retracted.
Oh. So she never actually researched any rape stories?
Anyway, its a good sign when people take accountability for spurious name-calling as a result of laziness.
Yeah, I agree with you. I think she did the right thing in the end. That doesn’t stop her from being wrong about “HIV”, but credit to her for admitting her mistake.
Thank you Rebecca, this post is well done! We need to be able to question everything! Maybe next you can tackle the phenomenon of “that story has been debunked.”
My new 'HIV causes AIDS' conspiracy-thriller 'A Dive Into Darkness' is available as an ebook and in paperback. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-dive-into-darkness-paul-franks/1145527746
The sequel, 'A Darker Dive', explores the CDC's conspiracy to deliberately hide the truth about AIDS to further its own ends (see also Kary Mullis).
All the forces of evil depend on the contagion disease model, especially the virus contagion model, to implement their plans, whether pharma profiteers, digital ID/cbdc, or population control psychos- the whole authoritarian movement. Those forces understand that every dissenting voice must be squelched to effectively sustain a propaganda charade.
This propaganda campaign is not a recent development- it has been developing for over a century (with some fits and starts,) and is now close to achieving its goal. But most of that success was achieved largely out of sight of the general public. However, the events of 2020 revealed their whole damn plan, and we are resisting in various ways.
Turns out the greatest weakness of the contagion disease model, and especially the virus contagion model, is its complete lack of supporting scientific evidence. The scientific evidence, in fact, tells exactly the opposite story. AIDS was not a "syndrome," but, was instead a fabricated fake epidemic (callously implicating a single demographic as its source) created by designating 3 dozen different actual conditions or symptoms as a single disease.
And this blaming of a single demographic was intentional mal intent- as Dr. Kevin Corbett points out, why else would a patient diagnosed with tuberculosis suddenly be categorized as an "AIDS" case if that patient self-identified as homosexual? Are we to believe the perpetrators of this plan did not select gay men as the target of their malice because they considered gay men an easy target?
And, as we now know, HIV as the cause of this fabricated epidemic, was itself a non-scientific proclamation, and was never an actual scientifically isolated or characterized entity.
So, when a claimed scientist such as Anna Merlan (or her fellow propaganda shills) attack someone for revealing the fraud behind AIDS/HIV and the death and harm caused by its claimed "treatments," as Dr. Culshaw Smith is doing successfully, they are simply working to perpetuate a giant propaganda campaign on behalf of the forces of evil.
Thank you Rebecca. I really appreciate your taking on the task of critiquing her article. It can't have been fun to have to include all those vile quotes. And do let us know if she agrees to have a discussion with you in a public forum! (Not holding my breath....)