You talk about "HIV positives" as if it is something meaningful. Are you asserting that there is some test that is reliable for detecting HIV in a patient? If so what test would that be? Western Blot? Elisa? or something else?
Are you asserting that so-called "HIV virus" exists and has been shown to be the causative agent of "AIDS"?
(I've never read any scientific paper with legitimate methods that shows this. In fact there's plenty of evidence to the contrary, e.g., from statements by R. Gallo himself, and others, like Kary Mullis).
Are you purporting that "AIDS" is a single specific disease condition with a singular cause?
Because even though Peter Duesberg never questioned the existence of HIV, he clearly showed that so-called "AIDS" is a grab bag of unrelated symptoms and conditions, with many different possible causes.
I'm just confused by your whole approach. You put some things in "scare quotes" as if you doubt their authenticity. But it's very clear from your comments overall that you largely accept the official HIV / AIDS narrative. Would you say that's an accurate statement?
I do not accept the overall HIV AIDS story. My approach consists largely of attacking the premises from within the framework of the paradigm. I, along with many other scientists, have decidedly falsified HIV AIDS, but the AIDS establishment apparently believes we live in a post-falsification world.
I would not say that’s an accurate statement. I’m not going to rehash my position yet again, but if you check my archives and read any of my books, it should be obvious. Probably the best starting point is my post from early august Do I think HIV exists? Here’s the link!
Hi Bill, I am reading your comments after posting my comment/suggestion to Rebecca. She cant keep stating her position in all her articles, but i think it is so important for writers who are calling out the HIV/AIDS narratives to be careful they dont look like they are affirming aspects of them....because the reader is not 'getting' the message intended by the writer. My technique, is to put anything i doubt the existence/truth of...'HIV', 'covid', 'AIDS'.....like that...in quotation marks. Maybe useful, maybe not?
Bill the reality is that 40 years down the line almost 40 millions are living with the "virus" whatever you may call it, 40 millions have died from it those are official stats whether you believe it or not, seems that the unofficial narrative has not stood the test of time almost all positive deniers have eventually died of AIDS related disease if what is being read in a media is true
Hi Rebecca, I am just reading your last book more thoroughly (not the new one, yet)...
Anyone reading it, and your articles, will glean that you have grave questions about HIV and AIDS being the 'things' we are told.
Can I make a suggestion please, that when writing an article such as this one that you more clearly indicate the paragraphs being quoted. (put them in quotation marks, different font??)
For me, just having the line beside the quoted paragraph doesnt have enough effect, so I got confused as to what you were specifically saying. (I, who analyses from point of view that the whole Economist article is laced with deceit, and i am someone keen to pick out your views, likely to correspond with, or enhance, mine. )
I think the better differentiation between your views and quoted paragraphs is worthy especially mindful of new readers of your work (more influenced by conventional narratives) who might get confused, and even have a greater 'take-away' of the content of the quotes, rather than your opinion.
Anyway, my hunch...my experience, so felt to feed back to you. Cheers
I just read the Economist article. I cant find an adjective to sum it up. Plain 'menacing and horrid' will have to do. They are cunningly spinning the historical personal and societal carnage of past decades, induced by belief in HIV/AIDS, through into the present. In effect cementing the 'bricks of lies' into a wall...with the cement made of all kinds of ingredients (incl Daily Mail type focus to bring us the most shocking personal 'stories') ...to render the reader in a swoon about the awfulness of the 'African situation'...and surely, in effect saying, "the only way to gain order with these natives is to jab them when young and willing at school"
But keep in mind the article, in telling some truths yet re-inforcing prejudiced thinking, (getting us emotionally engaged and not thinking straight...regardless of any belief HIV exists, or not, and any query of what AIDS is, or not) is at a deeper level peddling its 'occult' ( both the hidden and satanic) intentions....
This paragraph in the article is saying the jabs are being rolled out already....
"Longer-lasting drugs are in the pipeline, and could “change the trajectory” of the disease, says Deborah Waterhouse, the boss of Viiv. The first not-for-profit delivery of Viiv’s two-month injection, to PEPFAR, will be in October. It has regulatory approval in four southern African countries, and has been licensed to cheap generic manufacturers. Gilead, an American firm, has a drug called lenacapavir, which is already used as a treatment, and which breaks down so slowly that it might work as a prophylaxis for six months. It is in clinical trials among girls in South Africa and Uganda".
The uptake of the 'covid' jabs in African countries has been low, and only really applying to middle-class urbanites, not rural people. These jabs getting into the heart of rural schools offer great opportunity to be laced with the lipid nanotechnology and graphene oxide the controllers aim to get in all humans to either kill, maim (the real AIDS infliction), or link them up to the grid.
HCG hormone has previously been put into Hepatitis vaccinations to promote infertility.... no surprise they wish to go way beyond that level of nefariousness with this programme.
Rebecca can you dig into these cure of HIV I now know of there's 6 people who are now cured with only one among them naturally cured the Argentina woman,
In South Africa we know people who get different results in different testing sites, either through lab results or rapid tests, I don't know whether such has been explored in your books
Rebecca There's no denying the business side of the whole HIV /AIDS theory, but the deadly social impact of it can't be denied young girls of school age are properties of older man with money and when they are sick/infected nolonger in fashion or demand they go back to their age group it is a vicious circle for me personally my only worry is side effects of such as I've seen in your previous articles, but it seems the current regime of Arvs have been doing wonders for people
As someone living in the Sub Sahara particularly South Africa knowing the culture in our "black areas" it's a difficult issue indeed if the aim is to prevent the spread of HIV well it could help the issue could be well be side effects of these in a long run, anyway most people they rather die of anything else rather than "HIV /AIDS" to die young from any condition that have nothing to do with HIV is honourable so to speak, so I guess everyone will jump to get their prep at school yes on the other hand it will promote promiscuity because every as it currently happening "is safe" mostly at varsity level as they about to go out tonight have a prep pills in their sleep over purse
These are very discouraging developments. PrEP for school girls? Give me a break! Let's hope more and more cooler and wiser heads stand up all over the world and push back. Your work helps to wake people up!! Thank you.
Unfortunately these girls are more vulnerable in our Society, the Sugar daddy/ Ben 10 (older women with young boys) socio economic and the trend/social media culture leads to this and mostly affected and infected are young school girl
Yes, our society and culture prey upon vulnerable girls, and that phenomenon along with its roots definitely needs to be addressed, but these girls do not need PrEP, and need to be protected from Pharma also preying on them!
Maybe, maybe not replacing of one devil with another, one thing to look at prevelance of HIV in the respective countries Brazil, Russia, India and China, South Africa is already epicenter of the world. How are advanced are these partners in research and treatment of this virus
According to modern Christian Philosophers, the concept of the Human “Mind” displaced the concept of the Human Soul. The original definition of Psyche is the Human SOUL...
Hi Rebecca,
You talk about "HIV positives" as if it is something meaningful. Are you asserting that there is some test that is reliable for detecting HIV in a patient? If so what test would that be? Western Blot? Elisa? or something else?
Are you asserting that so-called "HIV virus" exists and has been shown to be the causative agent of "AIDS"?
(I've never read any scientific paper with legitimate methods that shows this. In fact there's plenty of evidence to the contrary, e.g., from statements by R. Gallo himself, and others, like Kary Mullis).
Are you purporting that "AIDS" is a single specific disease condition with a singular cause?
Because even though Peter Duesberg never questioned the existence of HIV, he clearly showed that so-called "AIDS" is a grab bag of unrelated symptoms and conditions, with many different possible causes.
I'm just confused by your whole approach. You put some things in "scare quotes" as if you doubt their authenticity. But it's very clear from your comments overall that you largely accept the official HIV / AIDS narrative. Would you say that's an accurate statement?
Thanks for clarifying.
BH
I do not accept the overall HIV AIDS story. My approach consists largely of attacking the premises from within the framework of the paradigm. I, along with many other scientists, have decidedly falsified HIV AIDS, but the AIDS establishment apparently believes we live in a post-falsification world.
I would not say that’s an accurate statement. I’m not going to rehash my position yet again, but if you check my archives and read any of my books, it should be obvious. Probably the best starting point is my post from early august Do I think HIV exists? Here’s the link!
https://rebeccaculshawsmith.substack.com/p/do-i-think-hiv-exists
Hi Bill, I am reading your comments after posting my comment/suggestion to Rebecca. She cant keep stating her position in all her articles, but i think it is so important for writers who are calling out the HIV/AIDS narratives to be careful they dont look like they are affirming aspects of them....because the reader is not 'getting' the message intended by the writer. My technique, is to put anything i doubt the existence/truth of...'HIV', 'covid', 'AIDS'.....like that...in quotation marks. Maybe useful, maybe not?
Bill the reality is that 40 years down the line almost 40 millions are living with the "virus" whatever you may call it, 40 millions have died from it those are official stats whether you believe it or not, seems that the unofficial narrative has not stood the test of time almost all positive deniers have eventually died of AIDS related disease if what is being read in a media is true
>almost 40 millions are living with the "virus" whatever you may call it,
Nonsense. What is your proof or evidence?
>40 millions have died from it
Rubbish. ZERO people have died from HIV/AIDS, because, just like CON-VID, it's not a real disease.
1: AIDS is not a new, unique, or defining (or distinguishing) Syndrome.
2: No suspect "Virus", HIV or otherwise, was ever isolated, AS PER Robert Gallo himself!
3: There is no proof the hypothetical, never seen in a patient sample "HIV Virus" causes the nondistinguishing Syndrome.
This all is EXACTLY like CON-VID.
Fake Fake Fake
Everywhere you look.
If you say it's real, then show me some science.
2 & 3 are questionable
Sorry, not Gallo. Luc Montaginer. The rest is correct.
Hi Rebecca, I am just reading your last book more thoroughly (not the new one, yet)...
Anyone reading it, and your articles, will glean that you have grave questions about HIV and AIDS being the 'things' we are told.
Can I make a suggestion please, that when writing an article such as this one that you more clearly indicate the paragraphs being quoted. (put them in quotation marks, different font??)
For me, just having the line beside the quoted paragraph doesnt have enough effect, so I got confused as to what you were specifically saying. (I, who analyses from point of view that the whole Economist article is laced with deceit, and i am someone keen to pick out your views, likely to correspond with, or enhance, mine. )
I think the better differentiation between your views and quoted paragraphs is worthy especially mindful of new readers of your work (more influenced by conventional narratives) who might get confused, and even have a greater 'take-away' of the content of the quotes, rather than your opinion.
Anyway, my hunch...my experience, so felt to feed back to you. Cheers
I just read the Economist article. I cant find an adjective to sum it up. Plain 'menacing and horrid' will have to do. They are cunningly spinning the historical personal and societal carnage of past decades, induced by belief in HIV/AIDS, through into the present. In effect cementing the 'bricks of lies' into a wall...with the cement made of all kinds of ingredients (incl Daily Mail type focus to bring us the most shocking personal 'stories') ...to render the reader in a swoon about the awfulness of the 'African situation'...and surely, in effect saying, "the only way to gain order with these natives is to jab them when young and willing at school"
But keep in mind the article, in telling some truths yet re-inforcing prejudiced thinking, (getting us emotionally engaged and not thinking straight...regardless of any belief HIV exists, or not, and any query of what AIDS is, or not) is at a deeper level peddling its 'occult' ( both the hidden and satanic) intentions....
This paragraph in the article is saying the jabs are being rolled out already....
"Longer-lasting drugs are in the pipeline, and could “change the trajectory” of the disease, says Deborah Waterhouse, the boss of Viiv. The first not-for-profit delivery of Viiv’s two-month injection, to PEPFAR, will be in October. It has regulatory approval in four southern African countries, and has been licensed to cheap generic manufacturers. Gilead, an American firm, has a drug called lenacapavir, which is already used as a treatment, and which breaks down so slowly that it might work as a prophylaxis for six months. It is in clinical trials among girls in South Africa and Uganda".
The uptake of the 'covid' jabs in African countries has been low, and only really applying to middle-class urbanites, not rural people. These jabs getting into the heart of rural schools offer great opportunity to be laced with the lipid nanotechnology and graphene oxide the controllers aim to get in all humans to either kill, maim (the real AIDS infliction), or link them up to the grid.
HCG hormone has previously been put into Hepatitis vaccinations to promote infertility.... no surprise they wish to go way beyond that level of nefariousness with this programme.
Rebecca can you dig into these cure of HIV I now know of there's 6 people who are now cured with only one among them naturally cured the Argentina woman,
In South Africa we know people who get different results in different testing sites, either through lab results or rapid tests, I don't know whether such has been explored in your books
Rebecca There's no denying the business side of the whole HIV /AIDS theory, but the deadly social impact of it can't be denied young girls of school age are properties of older man with money and when they are sick/infected nolonger in fashion or demand they go back to their age group it is a vicious circle for me personally my only worry is side effects of such as I've seen in your previous articles, but it seems the current regime of Arvs have been doing wonders for people
As someone living in the Sub Sahara particularly South Africa knowing the culture in our "black areas" it's a difficult issue indeed if the aim is to prevent the spread of HIV well it could help the issue could be well be side effects of these in a long run, anyway most people they rather die of anything else rather than "HIV /AIDS" to die young from any condition that have nothing to do with HIV is honourable so to speak, so I guess everyone will jump to get their prep at school yes on the other hand it will promote promiscuity because every as it currently happening "is safe" mostly at varsity level as they about to go out tonight have a prep pills in their sleep over purse
These are very discouraging developments. PrEP for school girls? Give me a break! Let's hope more and more cooler and wiser heads stand up all over the world and push back. Your work helps to wake people up!! Thank you.
Unfortunately these girls are more vulnerable in our Society, the Sugar daddy/ Ben 10 (older women with young boys) socio economic and the trend/social media culture leads to this and mostly affected and infected are young school girl
Yes, our society and culture prey upon vulnerable girls, and that phenomenon along with its roots definitely needs to be addressed, but these girls do not need PrEP, and need to be protected from Pharma also preying on them!
What solution do you offer in the current socio economic situation particularly in Africa
one possibility: https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/the-bri-in-africa-gateway-to-peace?
Maybe, maybe not replacing of one devil with another, one thing to look at prevelance of HIV in the respective countries Brazil, Russia, India and China, South Africa is already epicenter of the world. How are advanced are these partners in research and treatment of this virus
According to modern Christian Philosophers, the concept of the Human “Mind” displaced the concept of the Human Soul. The original definition of Psyche is the Human SOUL...