When I began my research into HIV AIDS in June '20, off the back of Covid, and listening to a radio series called 'A Big Disease With A Little Name', I believed totally that HIV caused AIDS. By the middle of Feb 2021 I knew the truth. The “official story” regarding HIV AIDS was imperfect and dirty as hell, with the most blatant flaw possible. Now I have completed a thriller 'A DIve Into Darkness' based on my research, which will be released on Amazon this Halloween. I have begun work on 'CascAIDS: The shocking true story of how a clique of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic.'
For me, and I'm sure many others, covid was the bull in the china shop. Like I've mentioned before I never gave HIV AIDS a second thought until covid came around, I never even knew who Fauci was before 2020, only to learn he was the kingpin during both AIDS and covid. I suppose that's the power they have to keep people in the dark
That has references to >900 mainstream articles that show for instance that testing "HIV+" can be due to DOZENS of things; and that "HIV+" has never been proven to be transmissible or infectious.
The cases you cite are either fictitious, or what was transmitted was one of the dozens of conditions that cause "HIV" positive test
3 HIV is sexually transmitted I've heard and know of people who initially tested negative then engaged on unprotected sex with HIV positive unknowingly so and seroconvert to be HIV positive, or infected by partners who didn't disclose or cheated infact I just came across a story of the pregnant lady who on the first trimester tested negative and on the second trimester test positive assumption is that the guy cheated and contracted the virus and further infect her and the baby, the lady says she gave a pre mature birth due to the shock of the diagnosis so the child also got infected. I
4 lastly I know you'll talk about PADAN study that as well have their own inconsistency like who would real sleep with a positive continuously so, knowing they might be infected for life something is not true there, and the report say chances are rare, not completely impossible, so many people have confessed to sleep around without protection hence they eventually become positive, what has not been studied particularly in Africa, South Africa specifically why is that other risk group people never convert even after exposure are they having CCR5 thing, I don't know in the DRC area there's a group of people know as elite controllers who are not progressing to AIDS
If hiv “is sexually transmitted” how do you explain the fact that in the u.s. for forty years now it has remained primarily restricted to original risk groups testing and treating for the often undetectable phantom while nearly every other sexually transmitted infection has increased in general population? How do you propose that condoms used primarily in the population most affected by the phantom prevented spread of hiv in the general population where obviously condoms were not being used?
Then explain the steady increase of nearly every other sexually transmitted infection in the general population . Not to mention the steady increase at least through the year 2000 in the annual rate of abortions/unwanted-unintended pregnancies.
Where in USA? Other STDs is there a prep for them? Many abortion that means unwanted pregnancy such is a possible risk but as I have said before one sexual partner who is also negative doesn't pose a risk
In the usa. Doesn’t matter where. A sexually transmitted infectious plague would not remain primarily restricted to a distinct subculture for forty years. prep or no prep.
Hi X man. Is it not a fact that a pregnant woman has liklihood of producing antibodies which the Eliza HIV test will deem as antibodies to HIV? As antibody detection/labelling is so random...it is the mother of notion of HIV
I'm fully with you but at the same time not all pregnant woman test positive, that is where it puzzles me, some women test positive whilst the father of the (baby) is negative having been in the relationship together for years and some women claim not to take the ARVs until they give birth to a negative child (confusing) but some instances both parents test positive and the child negative due to using PMTCT, we have some celebrated couple U=U ambassadors a woman is positive and man negative they just had a baby who is negative, Bottom line it's few cases such happens that only a woman test positive whilst men is negative I'm talking without treatment and natural sex
How does this not make it clear to you that the tests are flawed, faulty, meaningless and worthless? When, where, how and by who was purified isolate of hiv obtained from a patient suffering illness that allowed a Gold Standard for diagnostic testing? Without purified isolate of the suspected disease causing agent to establish a Gold Standard for testing what are the tests testing for?
The USA number maybe consistent due to treatment and prevention strategy, U=U don't you think? Why is South African number grew so much to be largest in the world I'm not for certain in the 80s or early 90s what were South African numbers but recently about 200 000 averagely or more new infections since 2020 every year 2019 numbers were 7.5 now 8.4 millions can you explain that and certainly most new infected people can trace who or where they got infected
Interesting that you bring up Africa/South Africa where the phantom hiv is theorized to have originated and where it spreads heterosexually prompting predictions of decimation of the African population by the year 2000 but where the population has factually since more than doubled. How did that happen? Shouldn’t all that baby making sex be spreading deadly hiv that is presumed rampant among the population? Since the 1985 Bangui definition of AIDS in Africa no hiv test is required for an AIDS diagnosis and infection is presumed based on symptoms and illness that while entirely different from the leading AIDS diseases in developed countries and have been the leading killers in Africa since before hiv is theorized to have made the leap to humans were previously recognized as caused by malnutrition and protein deficiency? Shouldn’t all those hiv positive Africans be giving birth to hiv infected infants who die before growing up and making babies?
That is old history let's talk about now, South Africa have test most private hospital use 4th/5th generation test kit so I presume that is most sensitive
It is NOT “old history”. Do you actually propose it is sensible to spend money on hiv tests for people who have no food, water, sanitation or healthcare?
No that is not what I'm saying, give people food and all, but if those people can't stand and work due to I'll health caused by the virus how long should you hand out, rather prevent, treat those in danger /at risk
Gallo is still alive he is the one who held the first patent to HIV test, the validity of the test is another subject I think Rebecca covered it in her book, it's something to explore as to why some test positive and others negative, what standard are used
Some "babies" died before they could reach teen years, search Nkosi Johnson case, in the early 2000 they introduced neverapine to prevent mother to child transmission, such that you have negative child even though both parents are positive, just now on Facebook there's a trending story about such siblings born negative whose parents died of AIDS because they were HIV positive
It has long struck me that the highest cause of baby mortality on the African continent i believe to be due to diarrhoea. I always wondered about any colleration between childhood vax/some degree of malnutrition and the onset of diarrhoea. I have never heard it discussed.
Diarrhoea is protective....the fast expulsion of toxins...but which can push the human cleansing system into dangerous overdrive...
“in the early 2000” would have been too late if the 1984 proposed but unproven, terribly flawed and thankfully completely failed hiv theory were true. Are you a paid pharma shill? All you do is promote claim of safe and effective drugs with absolutely no verifiable data to support them.
I considered that too...'paid pharma shill'. Giving benefit of that doubt (it is a strange phrase eh) ...that passed through...
Seems to me that X man has committed to the HIV narrative very deeply and is in contortions to find solution to personal situation within that false premise paradigm. His intuition, and nag to determine truth, keeps him here on this Substack?...
Otherwise why hang around when not getting an ounce of affirmation of one's views??
Kindly explain how the “prevention strategy” of condoms used primarily in the subculture most afflicted by AIDS prevented spread of the phantom among the general heterosexual population where other sexually transmitted infections increased. If condoms haven’t stopped hiv from decimating the original risk groups testing and treating for the often undetectable phantom how did they stop the long promised/threatened “explosion into general population”?
Despite was ever any virus ever purify and isolated if not we must find another name, but reality is that there's a something people test positive or negative on and is killing
I feel for your quandry. It is horrible being pitched about by thoughts and ideas which leave you not knowing which way to turn, how to act.
Maybe come at this from different angles....?
It is not so much getting clear in one's mind what HIV/AIDs is, isnt, or might be. Can we ever pin these concepts/realities/charlatans down comprehensively????
Looking into 'COVID' made me question the whole bigger picture of our life on Earth... in broadening understanding of that (and realising it is not a bunch of roses, and never has been...and 'forces that be' are happy with that) i was able to look at HIV through a new lense.
One person who has hepled with fresh vision is undoubtedly Dr David Martin, who 'knows' life as a vast tapestry. Have a hard listen to his informative and inspiring recent interview..... he really 'gets' the dynamics underpinning events.
It might just tweak you a bit to see HIV differently in the broader scheme of things, past and unfolding....
Not everything is a conspiracy to kill the world it doesn't make sense who would just wake up and decide let's kill 38 millions people proposition on Race and geography
It isnt the case of 'just waking up and deciding to kill 38 million people'....it is more of a question of opening up to the fact, waking up to the fact that some people care not for ordinary humanity...
Some, yeah a small minority but with power, see it as ok to kill billions of us as we are apparently spoiling the planet, and resources need to be kept for themselves, so they need to exert gross top down control (inner control for those converted to cyborgs) so as to maintain themselves in the upper echelon of materialism....and us under a constant cosh.
It takes a while to take this on board, but the intent has been there, in the offing, for centuries... passed on through the generations.
You either believe this as manifestation of an evil that prevails, or just purely keep focused on aspects of the wider cunning plan....and not see the wood for the trees.
Only comparatively recently have I come to see the vastness of the rather impenetrable forest....and see we need be intrepid to enter it....
The aspects of the plan..... like why the idea of HIV got created.... is part of it. Small-scale test trials to see how well they are able to dupe us....and get death scenarios in our minds eye...
Might sound fantastic....but we dont think like they do.... We just have to imagine...for them the law of the jungle prevails...no morals, no compassion, anything goes...
How can it be explained otherwise how the way of the world is going?
Maybe Sir Bauer as Luc Montgnier said good immune system can mitigate if one is not exposed numerous times, but frequent exposure and weak immune plus other factors can lead to chronic infection, I haven't seen or heard of his other claims about proper nutrition and anti oxidant can reverse positive status to negative unfortunately he passed on still benefitting from HIV tests. I witnessed couples die one after other, in the late 90s and early 2000s South Africa had Child headed families because parents died of the sexual transmitted virus, The prevention of mother to child transmission played a huge role in saving the children, Men came back from mining towns sick (Jhb)because most have numerous girlfriends there and infected their spouses in the rural areas, Truck drivers it was the same they had girls all over the country and went back home and infect the wives, I believe sexual transmission is proven beyond any reasonable doubt, so many criminal cases in USA against those who deliberately infected their spouse's or girlfriends, Peranzee case in Australia did you forget about it,
Iit might not be "HIV" but there's an infectious something that is sexually transmitted
just learnt of "The Availability Cascade: How Information Spreads on a Large Scale"...via Paul Frank's substack... ties in with 'mind virus' i mentioned elsewhere....
I am doing good thanks. Now more accepting of the situation, and so more in mood to adjust and make the most of it. Maybe is but something occurring as a transition. It is not like I have been bombed out of home, or had to flee from earthquake or some kind of assault like a land grab or military overrun...so can feel blessed for still being in a relatively stable part of the world, for now anyway! Thanks for your concern. Cheers
Mum with her advanced dementia is in her own world, just exists in the moment, generally oblivious to concepts, let alone one of eviction. So she is as 'ok' as I and my sister, maintain such for her.That is how it is!
Correct my brother we all indoctrinated, now we must check the evidence of or against such indoctrination, I have several times in previous posts in response to you or others, my indoctrination comes from the perspective of how my surroundings are affected by the HIV/Aids dogma through sickness and death. Based on the HIV Test. Now I have read and watch videos of those who are labeled "deniers" of HIV I haven't come across any documented evidence of their position instead opposite happens, Christy Magoire, Kim Bannon and many other succumbed to the very AIDS they denied atleast that is what is there in the media with no contestation, so many early Anti Aids dissidents are now taking ARVs
There's no mind virus, you can't explain why a positive person, sleep without condom with some one else and that other person turn HIV positive as well there's no mind Viruses there, you infected someone either deliberately if you knew your status
Sir one can read different books or blogs as I have done so in the past year, explain to me how does person who is "HIV positive " sleeps unprotected with someone who has tested negative on numerous times but after sexual encounters with the positive one seroconvert to HIV positive, if that is not sexually transmission the what it is? That was through heterosexual relationship
2 In prison environment it happens one prisoner is gang raped by 2 or more offenders and among the rapists one is HIV positive and the victim who was HIV negative during his admission turn to be HIV positive after the rape especially if such incident is not medical attended within 72 hrs, even other rapist who continue raping after the positive one? 3 A Widow of a person who died from Aids related sickness and was positive becomes sick after few years and also dies from same sickness and HIV eg pneumonia
These are real life stories Mr Bauer not thumbsuck stories I have a friend whose girlfriend died of HIV related sicknesses and he also became sick and was found to be HIV positive fortunately he got proper treatment and he is now fit and strong again, unfortunately his girlfriend passed on.
I questioned HIV/AIDS when I discovered, via divine providence, Peter Duesberg's book. By that time I had already understood how corrupt medical practice was, so it wasn't a shock to discover the HIV fraud.
A fun challenge to Branch Covidians today is to ask them what they would have done during the AIDS crisis, although some will try and hide behind the shield of 'whataboutism'. Would they have locked up gay men? Would they have made sex without condoms illegal? Would they have made AZT compulsory? Would they have mandated HIV tests in the workforce? Thank goodness there was no chance of a vaccine!
It for obvious reasons they will target pregnant women, that simply say the was 1 unprotected sex, secondly try to stop further transmission to unborn child this Mr Bauer shows the most common mode of transmission is through sex where there's frequently exchange of bodily fluids,
I'm not yet convinced about unprotected sex not being the major mode of HIV transmission either heterosexual or Homosexual
With small numbers of people in areas where immigrants from Africa are not unlikely, race should be recognized as a possible confounding factor, since blackness is associated with a 7-22-fold greater likelihood of testing "HIV+"
In the 1980's I worked as admin asst for epidemiologists at UC Berkeley doing "cutting edge" HIV/ADIS research, and swallowed the "perfect narrative", although I was always puzzled by the extremely long so-called latent period between HIV infection and progression to AIDS. I was also struck by the virulence of the utter disdain my bosses expressed for Peter Duesberg starting in 1987. Then life took me elsewhere and I didn't think about HIV/AIDS much. Fast forward to 2020, and primed by my skepticism of the Covid narrative, someone sent me Celia Farber's 2006 Harper's article, which upended my entire perspective on the topic. I proceeded to read Duesberg's outstanding 1995 book 'Inventing the AIDS Virus", plus the work of other dissidents, including you, and what an awakening that has been! Thank you!!
RFKjr s book the Real Satanthony Fauci
I think a lot of people were woken up by that one.
I begged my housemate to read it
Although he said he would, he went and got injected instead
When I began my research into HIV AIDS in June '20, off the back of Covid, and listening to a radio series called 'A Big Disease With A Little Name', I believed totally that HIV caused AIDS. By the middle of Feb 2021 I knew the truth. The “official story” regarding HIV AIDS was imperfect and dirty as hell, with the most blatant flaw possible. Now I have completed a thriller 'A DIve Into Darkness' based on my research, which will be released on Amazon this Halloween. I have begun work on 'CascAIDS: The shocking true story of how a clique of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic.'
https://cascades.substack.com/p/cascaids
For me, and I'm sure many others, covid was the bull in the china shop. Like I've mentioned before I never gave HIV AIDS a second thought until covid came around, I never even knew who Fauci was before 2020, only to learn he was the kingpin during both AIDS and covid. I suppose that's the power they have to keep people in the dark
X man:
Go to https://thecaseagainsthiv.net/
That has references to >900 mainstream articles that show for instance that testing "HIV+" can be due to DOZENS of things; and that "HIV+" has never been proven to be transmissible or infectious.
The cases you cite are either fictitious, or what was transmitted was one of the dozens of conditions that cause "HIV" positive test
Have you looked at the Rethinking Aids website? https://rethinkingaids.com/
Thank You Mr Bauer! I have been Rethinking AIDS since 1987 and regularly use your Case Against HIV to prove my case.
My sincere thanks, Brother; mainly I hear from the other side!!
But interestingly none of the other side are able to challenge or refute your Case Against HIV.
3 HIV is sexually transmitted I've heard and know of people who initially tested negative then engaged on unprotected sex with HIV positive unknowingly so and seroconvert to be HIV positive, or infected by partners who didn't disclose or cheated infact I just came across a story of the pregnant lady who on the first trimester tested negative and on the second trimester test positive assumption is that the guy cheated and contracted the virus and further infect her and the baby, the lady says she gave a pre mature birth due to the shock of the diagnosis so the child also got infected. I
4 lastly I know you'll talk about PADAN study that as well have their own inconsistency like who would real sleep with a positive continuously so, knowing they might be infected for life something is not true there, and the report say chances are rare, not completely impossible, so many people have confessed to sleep around without protection hence they eventually become positive, what has not been studied particularly in Africa, South Africa specifically why is that other risk group people never convert even after exposure are they having CCR5 thing, I don't know in the DRC area there's a group of people know as elite controllers who are not progressing to AIDS
If hiv “is sexually transmitted” how do you explain the fact that in the u.s. for forty years now it has remained primarily restricted to original risk groups testing and treating for the often undetectable phantom while nearly every other sexually transmitted infection has increased in general population? How do you propose that condoms used primarily in the population most affected by the phantom prevented spread of hiv in the general population where obviously condoms were not being used?
Maybe monogamous relationship and loyalty to one sexual partner don't you think
Then explain the steady increase of nearly every other sexually transmitted infection in the general population . Not to mention the steady increase at least through the year 2000 in the annual rate of abortions/unwanted-unintended pregnancies.
Where in USA? Other STDs is there a prep for them? Many abortion that means unwanted pregnancy such is a possible risk but as I have said before one sexual partner who is also negative doesn't pose a risk
So you are proposing that the majority of unwanted/unintended pregnancies that are terminated with abortion occur among strictly monogamous couples?
Not necessarily so
In the usa. Doesn’t matter where. A sexually transmitted infectious plague would not remain primarily restricted to a distinct subculture for forty years. prep or no prep.
Why not? People engage in sex with condoms nower days more often than unprotected sex
Some cases don't make sense particularly for pregnant women whose partners are not positive
Hi X man. Is it not a fact that a pregnant woman has liklihood of producing antibodies which the Eliza HIV test will deem as antibodies to HIV? As antibody detection/labelling is so random...it is the mother of notion of HIV
I don't know what is and what is not a fact my brother
I'm fully with you but at the same time not all pregnant woman test positive, that is where it puzzles me, some women test positive whilst the father of the (baby) is negative having been in the relationship together for years and some women claim not to take the ARVs until they give birth to a negative child (confusing) but some instances both parents test positive and the child negative due to using PMTCT, we have some celebrated couple U=U ambassadors a woman is positive and man negative they just had a baby who is negative, Bottom line it's few cases such happens that only a woman test positive whilst men is negative I'm talking without treatment and natural sex
How does this not make it clear to you that the tests are flawed, faulty, meaningless and worthless? When, where, how and by who was purified isolate of hiv obtained from a patient suffering illness that allowed a Gold Standard for diagnostic testing? Without purified isolate of the suspected disease causing agent to establish a Gold Standard for testing what are the tests testing for?
The USA number maybe consistent due to treatment and prevention strategy, U=U don't you think? Why is South African number grew so much to be largest in the world I'm not for certain in the 80s or early 90s what were South African numbers but recently about 200 000 averagely or more new infections since 2020 every year 2019 numbers were 7.5 now 8.4 millions can you explain that and certainly most new infected people can trace who or where they got infected
Interesting that you bring up Africa/South Africa where the phantom hiv is theorized to have originated and where it spreads heterosexually prompting predictions of decimation of the African population by the year 2000 but where the population has factually since more than doubled. How did that happen? Shouldn’t all that baby making sex be spreading deadly hiv that is presumed rampant among the population? Since the 1985 Bangui definition of AIDS in Africa no hiv test is required for an AIDS diagnosis and infection is presumed based on symptoms and illness that while entirely different from the leading AIDS diseases in developed countries and have been the leading killers in Africa since before hiv is theorized to have made the leap to humans were previously recognized as caused by malnutrition and protein deficiency? Shouldn’t all those hiv positive Africans be giving birth to hiv infected infants who die before growing up and making babies?
That is old history let's talk about now, South Africa have test most private hospital use 4th/5th generation test kit so I presume that is most sensitive
“most sensitive” to what? Error? False positives?
It is NOT “old history”. Do you actually propose it is sensible to spend money on hiv tests for people who have no food, water, sanitation or healthcare?
No that is not what I'm saying, give people food and all, but if those people can't stand and work due to I'll health caused by the virus how long should you hand out, rather prevent, treat those in danger /at risk
Again, when, where, how and by who was purified isolate of hiv obtained to establish a Gold Standard for testing? What are the tests testing for?
Can Rebecca give us an extract/ summary on the tests from her book or any person who have some text or literature on the HIV test
Gallo is still alive he is the one who held the first patent to HIV test, the validity of the test is another subject I think Rebecca covered it in her book, it's something to explore as to why some test positive and others negative, what standard are used
Some "babies" died before they could reach teen years, search Nkosi Johnson case, in the early 2000 they introduced neverapine to prevent mother to child transmission, such that you have negative child even though both parents are positive, just now on Facebook there's a trending story about such siblings born negative whose parents died of AIDS because they were HIV positive
Some “babies” die.
It has long struck me that the highest cause of baby mortality on the African continent i believe to be due to diarrhoea. I always wondered about any colleration between childhood vax/some degree of malnutrition and the onset of diarrhoea. I have never heard it discussed.
Diarrhoea is protective....the fast expulsion of toxins...but which can push the human cleansing system into dangerous overdrive...
Yes those who were born with HIV
“in the early 2000” would have been too late if the 1984 proposed but unproven, terribly flawed and thankfully completely failed hiv theory were true. Are you a paid pharma shill? All you do is promote claim of safe and effective drugs with absolutely no verifiable data to support them.
I considered that too...'paid pharma shill'. Giving benefit of that doubt (it is a strange phrase eh) ...that passed through...
Seems to me that X man has committed to the HIV narrative very deeply and is in contortions to find solution to personal situation within that false premise paradigm. His intuition, and nag to determine truth, keeps him here on this Substack?...
Otherwise why hang around when not getting an ounce of affirmation of one's views??
What say you X man?
Kindly explain how the “prevention strategy” of condoms used primarily in the subculture most afflicted by AIDS prevented spread of the phantom among the general heterosexual population where other sexually transmitted infections increased. If condoms haven’t stopped hiv from decimating the original risk groups testing and treating for the often undetectable phantom how did they stop the long promised/threatened “explosion into general population”?
AIDS Since 1984: No Evidence For A New Viral Epidemic-Not Even In Africa. http://www.duesberg.com/articles/Duesberg%20et%20al_AIDS%20since%201984%20No%20evidence%20for%20a%20new%20viral%20epidemic%20not%20even%20in%20Africa_IJAE_2011.pdf
Maybe I'm in between the two sides, certain aspects I question but those who have scientific knowledge especially HIV/AIDS maybe able to answer
1, was it ever isolated and purified? 2,is viral load calculation counting the actual virus?
You will not find anyone who can truthfully say anything but a NO and NO to those 2 questions
Despite was ever any virus ever purify and isolated if not we must find another name, but reality is that there's a something people test positive or negative on and is killing
I feel for your quandry. It is horrible being pitched about by thoughts and ideas which leave you not knowing which way to turn, how to act.
Maybe come at this from different angles....?
It is not so much getting clear in one's mind what HIV/AIDs is, isnt, or might be. Can we ever pin these concepts/realities/charlatans down comprehensively????
Looking into 'COVID' made me question the whole bigger picture of our life on Earth... in broadening understanding of that (and realising it is not a bunch of roses, and never has been...and 'forces that be' are happy with that) i was able to look at HIV through a new lense.
One person who has hepled with fresh vision is undoubtedly Dr David Martin, who 'knows' life as a vast tapestry. Have a hard listen to his informative and inspiring recent interview..... he really 'gets' the dynamics underpinning events.
It might just tweak you a bit to see HIV differently in the broader scheme of things, past and unfolding....
https://rumble.com/v3lflua-episode-8-silenced-with-tommy-robinson-dr-david-martin.html
Another angle you might try see better , from another perspective...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04tYUGHFzeA
Not everything is a conspiracy to kill the world it doesn't make sense who would just wake up and decide let's kill 38 millions people proposition on Race and geography
It isnt the case of 'just waking up and deciding to kill 38 million people'....it is more of a question of opening up to the fact, waking up to the fact that some people care not for ordinary humanity...
Some, yeah a small minority but with power, see it as ok to kill billions of us as we are apparently spoiling the planet, and resources need to be kept for themselves, so they need to exert gross top down control (inner control for those converted to cyborgs) so as to maintain themselves in the upper echelon of materialism....and us under a constant cosh.
It takes a while to take this on board, but the intent has been there, in the offing, for centuries... passed on through the generations.
You either believe this as manifestation of an evil that prevails, or just purely keep focused on aspects of the wider cunning plan....and not see the wood for the trees.
Only comparatively recently have I come to see the vastness of the rather impenetrable forest....and see we need be intrepid to enter it....
The aspects of the plan..... like why the idea of HIV got created.... is part of it. Small-scale test trials to see how well they are able to dupe us....and get death scenarios in our minds eye...
Might sound fantastic....but we dont think like they do.... We just have to imagine...for them the law of the jungle prevails...no morals, no compassion, anything goes...
How can it be explained otherwise how the way of the world is going?
I’ve watched some documentaries about the HIV AIDS controversy and read Official Stories: Counter-Arguments for a Culture in Need Paperback
by Liam Scheff.
Unfortunately, emotion is more powerful than rationality:
“Alternative facts” naturally trump objective reality
https://henryhbauer.substack.com/p/alternative-facts-naturally-trump
Maybe Sir Bauer as Luc Montgnier said good immune system can mitigate if one is not exposed numerous times, but frequent exposure and weak immune plus other factors can lead to chronic infection, I haven't seen or heard of his other claims about proper nutrition and anti oxidant can reverse positive status to negative unfortunately he passed on still benefitting from HIV tests. I witnessed couples die one after other, in the late 90s and early 2000s South Africa had Child headed families because parents died of the sexual transmitted virus, The prevention of mother to child transmission played a huge role in saving the children, Men came back from mining towns sick (Jhb)because most have numerous girlfriends there and infected their spouses in the rural areas, Truck drivers it was the same they had girls all over the country and went back home and infect the wives, I believe sexual transmission is proven beyond any reasonable doubt, so many criminal cases in USA against those who deliberately infected their spouse's or girlfriends, Peranzee case in Australia did you forget about it,
Iit might not be "HIV" but there's an infectious something that is sexually transmitted
an 'infectious something'....
just learnt of "The Availability Cascade: How Information Spreads on a Large Scale"...via Paul Frank's substack... ties in with 'mind virus' i mentioned elsewhere....
https://effectiviology.com/availability-cascade/
We are all thoroughly indoctrinated......
How are you doing my brother
I am doing good thanks. Now more accepting of the situation, and so more in mood to adjust and make the most of it. Maybe is but something occurring as a transition. It is not like I have been bombed out of home, or had to flee from earthquake or some kind of assault like a land grab or military overrun...so can feel blessed for still being in a relatively stable part of the world, for now anyway! Thanks for your concern. Cheers
Keep well with your mom, I hope she is OK as well
Mum with her advanced dementia is in her own world, just exists in the moment, generally oblivious to concepts, let alone one of eviction. So she is as 'ok' as I and my sister, maintain such for her.That is how it is!
Correct my brother we all indoctrinated, now we must check the evidence of or against such indoctrination, I have several times in previous posts in response to you or others, my indoctrination comes from the perspective of how my surroundings are affected by the HIV/Aids dogma through sickness and death. Based on the HIV Test. Now I have read and watch videos of those who are labeled "deniers" of HIV I haven't come across any documented evidence of their position instead opposite happens, Christy Magoire, Kim Bannon and many other succumbed to the very AIDS they denied atleast that is what is there in the media with no contestation, so many early Anti Aids dissidents are now taking ARVs
https://rethinkingaids.com/index.php/stricken-heroine-rethinkers-died-from-toxic-drugs-not-aids
There's no mind virus, you can't explain why a positive person, sleep without condom with some one else and that other person turn HIV positive as well there's no mind Viruses there, you infected someone either deliberately if you knew your status
"HIV" is not sexually transmitted and mayy not even exist.
Read my book The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS Theory, McFarland 2007
Sir one can read different books or blogs as I have done so in the past year, explain to me how does person who is "HIV positive " sleeps unprotected with someone who has tested negative on numerous times but after sexual encounters with the positive one seroconvert to HIV positive, if that is not sexually transmission the what it is? That was through heterosexual relationship
2 In prison environment it happens one prisoner is gang raped by 2 or more offenders and among the rapists one is HIV positive and the victim who was HIV negative during his admission turn to be HIV positive after the rape especially if such incident is not medical attended within 72 hrs, even other rapist who continue raping after the positive one? 3 A Widow of a person who died from Aids related sickness and was positive becomes sick after few years and also dies from same sickness and HIV eg pneumonia
These are real life stories Mr Bauer not thumbsuck stories I have a friend whose girlfriend died of HIV related sicknesses and he also became sick and was found to be HIV positive fortunately he got proper treatment and he is now fit and strong again, unfortunately his girlfriend passed on.
I questioned HIV/AIDS when I discovered, via divine providence, Peter Duesberg's book. By that time I had already understood how corrupt medical practice was, so it wasn't a shock to discover the HIV fraud.
A fun challenge to Branch Covidians today is to ask them what they would have done during the AIDS crisis, although some will try and hide behind the shield of 'whataboutism'. Would they have locked up gay men? Would they have made sex without condoms illegal? Would they have made AZT compulsory? Would they have mandated HIV tests in the workforce? Thank goodness there was no chance of a vaccine!
X-man:
Pregnancy is a risk factor for testing "HIV+". That's one of the clues that "HIV" is NOT a sexually transmitted thing.
It for obvious reasons they will target pregnant women, that simply say the was 1 unprotected sex, secondly try to stop further transmission to unborn child this Mr Bauer shows the most common mode of transmission is through sex where there's frequently exchange of bodily fluids,
I'm not yet convinced about unprotected sex not being the major mode of HIV transmission either heterosexual or Homosexual
But not every pregnant woman test positive,yes most Stats of HIV comes through during that by estimation would be 1 in 20 or so
With small numbers of people in areas where immigrants from Africa are not unlikely, race should be recognized as a possible confounding factor, since blackness is associated with a 7-22-fold greater likelihood of testing "HIV+"
Why is that?
In the 1980's I worked as admin asst for epidemiologists at UC Berkeley doing "cutting edge" HIV/ADIS research, and swallowed the "perfect narrative", although I was always puzzled by the extremely long so-called latent period between HIV infection and progression to AIDS. I was also struck by the virulence of the utter disdain my bosses expressed for Peter Duesberg starting in 1987. Then life took me elsewhere and I didn't think about HIV/AIDS much. Fast forward to 2020, and primed by my skepticism of the Covid narrative, someone sent me Celia Farber's 2006 Harper's article, which upended my entire perspective on the topic. I proceeded to read Duesberg's outstanding 1995 book 'Inventing the AIDS Virus", plus the work of other dissidents, including you, and what an awakening that has been! Thank you!!