An indirect response to the problems with the virus hypothesis of HIV aids, and other infectious illnesses, is Morphic Resonance, a novel concept of “infection” described by biologist Rupert Sheldrake.
I first encountered Dr Sheldrake’s work when I read his book, Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home. I quickly realized that he had a deep knowledge of the invisible connections between living organisms and also between “inanimate” substances. He also has a gift for creating simple research studies demonstrating it. He has written books and given lectures on the scientific explanation of this connection, which he refers to as Morphic Fields and “Morphic Resonance.”
During the past two years it became clear to me that morphic resonance explains “infection” better than the virus hypothesis. Otherwise how could we live in harmony with 37 trillion bacteria, fungi and viruses which are part of our natural human biome, and then get an infection from the very same microbes? I have become confident that when we are out of harmony, these microbes are invited to create an “infectious illness”. We are influenced by others in many ways, and there are also “collective unconscious” connections that likely have more significance than the viruses or bacteria in question.
Sheldrake adopted the term “Morphic Fields” from prior research by other scientists. He describes these fields as being similar to gravitational fields and electromagnetic fields that also have influences across great distances. Although we can interact and learn to manage this interaction, we cannot eliminate the connection any more than we can eliminate a gravitational field that keeps us attracted to the earth. Because he is a biologist, much of his research involves plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.
Here is a short clip of him describing some of his more interesting research into these connecting fields, related to the book I read “dogs that know when their owners are coming home.”
Etienne de Harven perceptively wrote in 2007, Viral epidemics follow the same systematic steps, these key steps include, inventing the risk of a disastrous epidemic, incriminating an elusive pathogen, ignoring alternative toxic causes, manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable numbers to maximize the false perception of an imminent catastrophe, and promising salvation with vaccines. This guarantees large financial returns. We are not witnessing viral epidemics, we are witnessing epidemics of fear, and both the media and the pharmaceutical industry carry most of the responsibility for amplifying fears, fears that happen, incidentally, to always ignite fantastically profitable business. Research hypotheses covering these area of virus research are practically never scientifically verified with appropriate controls. Established “consensus” is rapidly reshaped into dogma, efficiently perpetuated in a quasi religious manner by the media, including ensuring that research funding is restricted to projects supporting the dogma, excluding research into alternative hypotheses.
"HIV positivity is not transimittable " that is a lie, HIV positivity is very much transmittable anyone need clarity I will provide that one is how mostly HIV is growing everyday
I don't know what to make of Charles Ortleb's obsession with CFS. It's poorly-defined and certainly not caused by HHV-6 except to the extent some immunological dysfunction causes HHV-6 to become active. In fact, we now know herpes are beneficial due to trained immunity. I have no doubt some people got very sick with chronic conditions in the mid 80's around Lake Tahoe - but it could be a common toxicological exposure. Something I will note: Incline Village is right underneath the rocket launch path out of Vandenberg and in the 80's they were doing super-secret missile and weapons testing right overhead. Saying AIDS is the other half of CFS I just don't think is correct and Hilary Johnson's book trying to make CFS infectious and link it to Epstein-Barr or retroviruses is on the wrong path.
An indirect response to the problems with the virus hypothesis of HIV aids, and other infectious illnesses, is Morphic Resonance, a novel concept of “infection” described by biologist Rupert Sheldrake.
I first encountered Dr Sheldrake’s work when I read his book, Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home. I quickly realized that he had a deep knowledge of the invisible connections between living organisms and also between “inanimate” substances. He also has a gift for creating simple research studies demonstrating it. He has written books and given lectures on the scientific explanation of this connection, which he refers to as Morphic Fields and “Morphic Resonance.”
During the past two years it became clear to me that morphic resonance explains “infection” better than the virus hypothesis. Otherwise how could we live in harmony with 37 trillion bacteria, fungi and viruses which are part of our natural human biome, and then get an infection from the very same microbes? I have become confident that when we are out of harmony, these microbes are invited to create an “infectious illness”. We are influenced by others in many ways, and there are also “collective unconscious” connections that likely have more significance than the viruses or bacteria in question.
Sheldrake adopted the term “Morphic Fields” from prior research by other scientists. He describes these fields as being similar to gravitational fields and electromagnetic fields that also have influences across great distances. Although we can interact and learn to manage this interaction, we cannot eliminate the connection any more than we can eliminate a gravitational field that keeps us attracted to the earth. Because he is a biologist, much of his research involves plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi.
Here is a short clip of him describing some of his more interesting research into these connecting fields, related to the book I read “dogs that know when their owners are coming home.”
https://youtu.be/9QsPWitQovM
Etienne de Harven perceptively wrote in 2007, Viral epidemics follow the same systematic steps, these key steps include, inventing the risk of a disastrous epidemic, incriminating an elusive pathogen, ignoring alternative toxic causes, manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable numbers to maximize the false perception of an imminent catastrophe, and promising salvation with vaccines. This guarantees large financial returns. We are not witnessing viral epidemics, we are witnessing epidemics of fear, and both the media and the pharmaceutical industry carry most of the responsibility for amplifying fears, fears that happen, incidentally, to always ignite fantastically profitable business. Research hypotheses covering these area of virus research are practically never scientifically verified with appropriate controls. Established “consensus” is rapidly reshaped into dogma, efficiently perpetuated in a quasi religious manner by the media, including ensuring that research funding is restricted to projects supporting the dogma, excluding research into alternative hypotheses.
"HIV positivity is not transimittable " that is a lie, HIV positivity is very much transmittable anyone need clarity I will provide that one is how mostly HIV is growing everyday
Please provide citations indicating said transmissibility.
How are these proven to be lies
I don't know what to make of Charles Ortleb's obsession with CFS. It's poorly-defined and certainly not caused by HHV-6 except to the extent some immunological dysfunction causes HHV-6 to become active. In fact, we now know herpes are beneficial due to trained immunity. I have no doubt some people got very sick with chronic conditions in the mid 80's around Lake Tahoe - but it could be a common toxicological exposure. Something I will note: Incline Village is right underneath the rocket launch path out of Vandenberg and in the 80's they were doing super-secret missile and weapons testing right overhead. Saying AIDS is the other half of CFS I just don't think is correct and Hilary Johnson's book trying to make CFS infectious and link it to Epstein-Barr or retroviruses is on the wrong path.
Can you provide some citations about herpes being beneficial? I haven’t seen this before and I’m curious.
Here's a PBS minidoc on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmqy4rgSwGA&t=4s
Thank you. I’ll check it out.