" HIV and AIDS are not mysteries. We know what they are . . ."
Well that's interesting since "we" (which is actually "they") cannot even define AIDS globally. If it's different in the US than in Africa, how can we actually say we know what it is?
And if we "know" what HIV is, how come we only test for the antibodies to it?
I pity those poor souls who always follow trends. The problem for those people is that, when there is a big trend change, they enter in shock: all the contradictions and ghosts they used to believe in and take pride in researching scientifically turn out to be mere frauds.
And because of the shock, they cannot jump to the next trend.
And, in some cases, their career is over, because their names are forever linked to the fraud, in papers and documentaries and campaigns and all sorts of frauds about the HIV Erlkonig. They won't be chewed up by the system, but the applause is over. They have become dinosaurs over night.
All the bragging rights down the drain. No one will take them seriously ever again, professionally or personally. People who depend entirely on external approval can really die from the mental shock of losing everything.
What is money good for, really? I mean, money earned through cunning and deception. It's the greatest liability in the world.
Being at the bottom rung of the ladder of all the industry of lies is the most dangerous place in human society, and there are so many people living there, with their PhDs or their masters degrees, and their public persona as a media star.
I particularly pity the Political Scientists and the Historians and Social thinkers and Philosophers. Those were simply pretending that biology and medicine were real hard sciences. "Reality is real bruh! A equals A!"
All their arguments and fame hinge on the mass fraud of publicly funded biomedical science. It's going to be a massacre if and when the world realizes that "public health" was always a ruse.
So I just came out to my therapist that I'm an HIV-skeptic. He's a gay man and we started talking about STIs and the subject of PrEP came up. I decided to just go there, and I told him about my reservations about the entire HIV/AIDS thing. We had a pretty decent conversation. I told him about Gallo's Science papers, the April 1948 press conference before the papers were published, the non-specificity of the HIV antibody tests. I was really anxious so I hard time organizing my thoughts. He was receptive, but I'm nervous all he's going to do is consider me a 'denialist' from now on. Honestly, I'm less anxious coming out as gay than coming out as an HIV skeptic.
The thing that's ironic to me is that 'HIV' supposedly jumped from monkeys to humans and then ended up rapidly spreading through a specific sub-population in the Western world. Yet somehow, 'HIV-2' which is said to be more tropic to heterosexuals in Africa, can't seem to migrate through the same pathways after 40 years.
Angry outbursts, as exhibited by this fellow, are indicative of an emotionally unstable individual. I do have sympathy for such individuals, because it is a miserable existence to live in self-inflicted bondage to resentment and anger when a simple change of heart and thinking could immediately reverse that negative existence.
Not only should we ALL deny HIV's existence as a spreadable virus, but as the new book by Dan Roytas: 'Can You Catch A Cold?' explains, there is no proof of ANY communicable diseases by viruses which may not exist at all! BOOM 💥
Unfortunately, the HIV doesn't cause AIDS 'movement' has been
a) Up against massive opposition
b) Been v ineffective.
If the opponents had focused on the admission by Montagnier that the only thing they had, LAI, (which they sent to Gallo in Sept 83 and which became HTLVIII-B, the 'probable cause of AIDS') was a double contaminant, they would have eventually brought down the edifice. Unfortunately, Rebecca has never I think made any reference to this. She only ever writes about Truvada etc.
Again,'HIV causes AIDS' opponents would have helped their cause by focusing on the original immune system burn out hypothesis, with the focus on CMV as the main miscreant, a hypothesis supported by the CDC's Task Force reports published in August 83. The difficult truth is that a subgroup of gay males, through a combination of too much unprotected bathhouse sex and copious amounts of drugs, burnt out their immune systems. A subgroup of IVDUs did exactly the same thing to their immune systems in NY's shooting galleries.
'HIV causes AIDS' opponents need to focus more on what AIDS actually was in the early 80s and less on the current treatments.
Two comments: I discussed these things you think I haven’t addressed either in my book or in Why I Quit HIV and its sequel. The purpose of this substack is not to create a duplicate of a book that already exists. Second, the reason that I cover Truvada and PrEP extensively is that HIV AIDS has already been falsified. The only thing keeping it afloat is this collective trance so many are under that the appearance of the drugs working serves as proof of concept of their idea of causation. That is why I focus on the drugs —dismantle them and the paradigm will crumble. This is not a one woman job, but that’s my motivation.
You have a good narrative, but you don't have to drop f-bombs everywhere to make your point. I don't like to hear that word and I won't read it. I think you might want to clean up your potty mouth Ma'am. Blessings to All.
I didn’t actually swear at all. The curse words within the block quotes appeared in the original articles, written by someone else. I simply quoted their work.
No problem at all! I can see how it might get confusing when the block quotes are long—I sometimes need to to impart the message of the authors I’m critiquing using every ridiculous word they state! Otherwise I’d shorten them.
" HIV and AIDS are not mysteries. We know what they are . . ."
Well that's interesting since "we" (which is actually "they") cannot even define AIDS globally. If it's different in the US than in Africa, how can we actually say we know what it is?
And if we "know" what HIV is, how come we only test for the antibodies to it?
Thank you for defending Kennedy and Rodgers against a raving ideologue.
Raving ideologue is right; name calling, not stomaching the truth, and refluxing the mainstream acid.
I feel the change coming.
I pity those poor souls who always follow trends. The problem for those people is that, when there is a big trend change, they enter in shock: all the contradictions and ghosts they used to believe in and take pride in researching scientifically turn out to be mere frauds.
And because of the shock, they cannot jump to the next trend.
And, in some cases, their career is over, because their names are forever linked to the fraud, in papers and documentaries and campaigns and all sorts of frauds about the HIV Erlkonig. They won't be chewed up by the system, but the applause is over. They have become dinosaurs over night.
All the bragging rights down the drain. No one will take them seriously ever again, professionally or personally. People who depend entirely on external approval can really die from the mental shock of losing everything.
What is money good for, really? I mean, money earned through cunning and deception. It's the greatest liability in the world.
Being at the bottom rung of the ladder of all the industry of lies is the most dangerous place in human society, and there are so many people living there, with their PhDs or their masters degrees, and their public persona as a media star.
I particularly pity the Political Scientists and the Historians and Social thinkers and Philosophers. Those were simply pretending that biology and medicine were real hard sciences. "Reality is real bruh! A equals A!"
All their arguments and fame hinge on the mass fraud of publicly funded biomedical science. It's going to be a massacre if and when the world realizes that "public health" was always a ruse.
So I just came out to my therapist that I'm an HIV-skeptic. He's a gay man and we started talking about STIs and the subject of PrEP came up. I decided to just go there, and I told him about my reservations about the entire HIV/AIDS thing. We had a pretty decent conversation. I told him about Gallo's Science papers, the April 1948 press conference before the papers were published, the non-specificity of the HIV antibody tests. I was really anxious so I hard time organizing my thoughts. He was receptive, but I'm nervous all he's going to do is consider me a 'denialist' from now on. Honestly, I'm less anxious coming out as gay than coming out as an HIV skeptic.
The thing that's ironic to me is that 'HIV' supposedly jumped from monkeys to humans and then ended up rapidly spreading through a specific sub-population in the Western world. Yet somehow, 'HIV-2' which is said to be more tropic to heterosexuals in Africa, can't seem to migrate through the same pathways after 40 years.
Angry outbursts, as exhibited by this fellow, are indicative of an emotionally unstable individual. I do have sympathy for such individuals, because it is a miserable existence to live in self-inflicted bondage to resentment and anger when a simple change of heart and thinking could immediately reverse that negative existence.
Not only should we ALL deny HIV's existence as a spreadable virus, but as the new book by Dan Roytas: 'Can You Catch A Cold?' explains, there is no proof of ANY communicable diseases by viruses which may not exist at all! BOOM 💥
Here's Dr Sam and the author
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Dan-Roytas-Can-You-Catch-A-Cold:8
April 20th 2024 Germ Warfare – The Internecine Battle Over Germ Theory is Ratcheting Up! https://expose-news.com/2024/04/20/germ-warfare-the-internecine-battle-over-germ-theory-is-ratcheting-up/
Its Impossible: Virology Pseudoscience of Isolation, Transmission https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/its-impossible-virology-pseudoscience-of-isolation-transmission
History of Virus, Vaccine & Virology-Hitler, IG Farben, 3rd Reich https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/history-of-virus-vaccine-virology-hitler-ig-farben-3rd-reich
End of Germ Theory Part 3 ft Polio-->DDT & Bio-Weapons Lab Hoax https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/end-of-germ-theory-part-2-ft-polio-ddt-bio-weapons-lab-hoax
Virology Debunked w/ Cracker Jack PCR Test - 10 Points On-The-Box https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/virology-debunked-w-cracker-jack-pcr-test---10-points-on-the-box
The End Of Germ Theory Part 2 ft Polio Hoax https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/end-of-germ-theory-part-2-ft-polio-ddt-bio-weapons-lab-hoax
20 Facts on Vaccines & 20 on Masks for Doctors + Contagion? 20 Vaccines That Were Not Cures To Any Disease https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/20-facts-on-vaccines-doctors-forgot-17-diseases-not-cured-by-vax
Top 20 Origins Of Covid19 Part 3 ft You'll Believe Anything https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/poll-top-20-origins-of-covid-19-ft-youll-believe-anything
Germ-Virus Theory vs Terrain Theory Part 1 ft Fauci is HELLRAISER https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/germ-virus-theory-vs-terrain-theory-part-2-ft-fauci-is-hellraiser
Plandemonium "In the Crosshairs of Covid-19 Scientology Operation" - Reiner Fuellmich and an operation to silence a CoS-Critc https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/plandemonium-in-the-crosshairs-of
Unfortunately, the HIV doesn't cause AIDS 'movement' has been
a) Up against massive opposition
b) Been v ineffective.
If the opponents had focused on the admission by Montagnier that the only thing they had, LAI, (which they sent to Gallo in Sept 83 and which became HTLVIII-B, the 'probable cause of AIDS') was a double contaminant, they would have eventually brought down the edifice. Unfortunately, Rebecca has never I think made any reference to this. She only ever writes about Truvada etc.
Again,'HIV causes AIDS' opponents would have helped their cause by focusing on the original immune system burn out hypothesis, with the focus on CMV as the main miscreant, a hypothesis supported by the CDC's Task Force reports published in August 83. The difficult truth is that a subgroup of gay males, through a combination of too much unprotected bathhouse sex and copious amounts of drugs, burnt out their immune systems. A subgroup of IVDUs did exactly the same thing to their immune systems in NY's shooting galleries.
'HIV causes AIDS' opponents need to focus more on what AIDS actually was in the early 80s and less on the current treatments.
Two comments: I discussed these things you think I haven’t addressed either in my book or in Why I Quit HIV and its sequel. The purpose of this substack is not to create a duplicate of a book that already exists. Second, the reason that I cover Truvada and PrEP extensively is that HIV AIDS has already been falsified. The only thing keeping it afloat is this collective trance so many are under that the appearance of the drugs working serves as proof of concept of their idea of causation. That is why I focus on the drugs —dismantle them and the paradigm will crumble. This is not a one woman job, but that’s my motivation.
Thanks for all you do.
You have a good narrative, but you don't have to drop f-bombs everywhere to make your point. I don't like to hear that word and I won't read it. I think you might want to clean up your potty mouth Ma'am. Blessings to All.
I didn’t actually swear at all. The curse words within the block quotes appeared in the original articles, written by someone else. I simply quoted their work.
I see. Please forgive me.
No problem at all! I can see how it might get confusing when the block quotes are long—I sometimes need to to impart the message of the authors I’m critiquing using every ridiculous word they state! Otherwise I’d shorten them.