Kinda makes you wonder why they don't just put PrEP in the water like fluoride in the prisons considering they want people to take the drugs regardless. I'm particularly interested in the 'PrEP may be masking true positives' story. I read an article a year or two ago about a guy in the Bay Area who tested positive, sort of, after having been on PrEP for a while, and they couldn't get a clean signal on any of the various tests they used, some were positive, some negative, some indeterminant, much like Christine Maggiorie's tests. They finally threw their hands up and declared him positive. Instead of acknowledging the obvious, that the tests are wildcards, they just 'figured' he was positive.
I suspect that this “PrEP masking positive results” is going to be a big deal. I’ll definitely be reporting on that asap. Interesting about the guy with the inconsistent test results—I would bet that this is pretty common. Anyway, it’s a win-win for Big Pharma, since you get the drugs no matter how you test! PrEP for everyone!! Just when you thought “HIV” “science” couldn’t possibly get wackier. This is the most overachieving “virus” in history.
I like the “opt out” option. What do you want to bet that they have to opt in to “opting out”—i.e. are they even told they can say no? I got lucky with my OB, but I know many women who were not told that they had the option to “opt out” during pregnancy (back before 2010 when it became mandatory to test either the mother during pregnancy or the baby at birth).
Hmmm PrEP aggressive (coercive?) marketing plans appear to be penetrating more and more demographics: children, old folks, people of color, gays and lesbians, incarcerated individuals. When will they start honing in on everyone else??
They have to destroy language to then use as a weapon against Womanity.
Like, say , administrative segregation.
Ad seg is their term for torture and terror that is solitary isolation.
Once in jail it is impossible to resist any kind of medical coercion that is imposed
I’m sure that is the case in prison.
His order would require mandatory vaccines for all workers entering California prisons, all inmates who work outside the prisons and inmates https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/the-state-worker/article254569157.html
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has halted a mandate that would have required everyone working in California's prisons to be vaccinated https://www.sbsun.com/2022/04/27/appeals-court-tosses-vaccine-mandate-for-california-prison-guards/
Effective April 3, 2023, CDPH will no longer require COVID-19 vaccination and booster for staff. The current COVID-19 vaccine mandate (primary series) for staff https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/covid19/updated-vaccination-and-booster-requirements/
Kinda makes you wonder why they don't just put PrEP in the water like fluoride in the prisons considering they want people to take the drugs regardless. I'm particularly interested in the 'PrEP may be masking true positives' story. I read an article a year or two ago about a guy in the Bay Area who tested positive, sort of, after having been on PrEP for a while, and they couldn't get a clean signal on any of the various tests they used, some were positive, some negative, some indeterminant, much like Christine Maggiorie's tests. They finally threw their hands up and declared him positive. Instead of acknowledging the obvious, that the tests are wildcards, they just 'figured' he was positive.
I suspect that this “PrEP masking positive results” is going to be a big deal. I’ll definitely be reporting on that asap. Interesting about the guy with the inconsistent test results—I would bet that this is pretty common. Anyway, it’s a win-win for Big Pharma, since you get the drugs no matter how you test! PrEP for everyone!! Just when you thought “HIV” “science” couldn’t possibly get wackier. This is the most overachieving “virus” in history.
Is there any indication of enticement with reduction of time to be served if they take the cocktail?
That's also very bad!
I like the “opt out” option. What do you want to bet that they have to opt in to “opting out”—i.e. are they even told they can say no? I got lucky with my OB, but I know many women who were not told that they had the option to “opt out” during pregnancy (back before 2010 when it became mandatory to test either the mother during pregnancy or the baby at birth).
Hmmm PrEP aggressive (coercive?) marketing plans appear to be penetrating more and more demographics: children, old folks, people of color, gays and lesbians, incarcerated individuals. When will they start honing in on everyone else??