I wonder how long it's going to take for the world to wake up and realize the Perth Group was right, the 'HIV' tests are non-specific, but react under certain conditions of biological stress.
I am really confused Rebecca. And i am new to your writings. So pardon me if this sounds raw and unreasonable...
What basic premises are you using to come up with articles such as this? I have as much difficulty reading this kind of piecing together of your research about 'hiv' as with trying to understand the thousands of 'scientific papers' re "sequelae of 'covid' " (eg. on Elselvier).... which i rather view as up-arse confabulated conbobulations of tunnel vision amounting to nonsensical stories about an illusionary virus ...presented as scientific truth.
What are you actually trying to say, to somehow conclude ? (your 'conclusion' in process...your ongoing best shot at this moment)?.
I get the feeling you believe HIV exists yet I haven't got any idea (perhaps is clear in other articles of yours?) for what reason (s) you would think that way. Because if your research over all the years is giving you conviction HIV is just imaginary, why harp on about aspects of the HIV industry....when it is ALL nefarious intent...just malfeasance writ large.....and the root of the false edifice propogated in our minds has to be expunged fully, the complete structure of the HIV/AIDs horror show mechanism still being invented has to be dismantled and obliterated.
Writing about specific aspects of 'HIV' is nutrition to the EVIL root and the ongoing mechanics of it all otherwise. As it helps make the tissue of lies to continue giving impression of a true reality
The reason that I spend so much time covering the Truvada disaster and the problems with PrEP is because these drugs are being marketed to people and their adverse effects covered up; I think this information is important to disseminate. I am trying to shine a light on the censorship campaigns run by AIDS activists to bury any negative information about these medications, which is ultimately an attempt to deny informed consent to patients. And, crucially, I analyze the *actual* clinical trial data to try and make it crystal clear that the media is outright LYING not only about the dangers of these drugs, but also their efficacy.
And if they’re lying about that, why on earth should we believe them when they say “HIV is the virus that causes AIDS”?
Have read your 2006 article. I felt to cry actually. You detail it so well, and your approach, including your share of your relationship, (of your vulnerability), with 'the HIV propaganded threat' as a child, feels more personable than others who also rail against the Edifice of the HIV Paradigm... more-so acknowledging our 'plight' as deemed PLWHAs. (and one doesnt have to embrace any sense of 'victimhood' in calling it a plight...it is an objective blight according to mainstream global cultural perceptions)
Great Thanks for having the gumption to have quit! As you conclude, indeed it is ALL who ignorantly participate in what can be termed the ' Systemic HIV maraud of harm' who have to (must eventually) see the error of their ways!
I will get your book...and if anyone reading this is in UK, Blackwells have it in stock (UK Amazon not...best avoid them anyway eh)......
Hi Rebecca, I am seeing this after i commented on your lastest 'Does HIV exist' post. I will check your 'quit' link. Final analysis, the AIDS activists need illuminating they are lost souls, smitten by lies coursing through their veins.... causing untold harm....
Honestly, (and this is just my personal opinion...hope it ok Rebecca i share this on your Substack) you (and your sexual partner?) need take breath, and take stock. If your friend 'someone close' has tested positive that is one too many entered the AIDS zone trap. But if you do your thorough research you will both be liberated from this label, and the psychological consequences of whatever level of 'HIV sense of tarnish'.
You say you are about to test...don't do it. If you have any wonder about the accuracy of PCR to confirm that concept they call covid, or anything else (pcr was only ever intended for lab use, not clinical diagnosis), then extend your querying to the ELISA, Rapid, Western Blot, Viral Load tests, etc for HIV. All are doubtful to be diagnosing anything specific. Do not trust the tests.
All the best in negotiating all this. If your friend is pressurising you to test, you have to put yourself first, to make own choice...and the 2 of you will have to work with that. It will be a great challenge for your relationship but holds great potential if you can get to a truthful point together in all this so loaded space...
I just tested my full blood count which is very low, White blood cell is at 2.2, red at 3.8, Heomoglobin 12.3 everything is Low by critical organs are fine, my skin is pale, so with these results they will demand HIV test
My knowledge (or remembering) of blood work (eg. the ranges of 'normal') is scanty to be taking those figures/markers and make comment. Important aspects are other symptoms/how well you feel generally. Where are you living for it to be legal for a HIV test to be demanded. That is contrary to your rights as a Sovereign human.
I wonder how long it's going to take for the world to wake up and realize the Perth Group was right, the 'HIV' tests are non-specific, but react under certain conditions of biological stress.
I am really confused Rebecca. And i am new to your writings. So pardon me if this sounds raw and unreasonable...
What basic premises are you using to come up with articles such as this? I have as much difficulty reading this kind of piecing together of your research about 'hiv' as with trying to understand the thousands of 'scientific papers' re "sequelae of 'covid' " (eg. on Elselvier).... which i rather view as up-arse confabulated conbobulations of tunnel vision amounting to nonsensical stories about an illusionary virus ...presented as scientific truth.
What are you actually trying to say, to somehow conclude ? (your 'conclusion' in process...your ongoing best shot at this moment)?.
I get the feeling you believe HIV exists yet I haven't got any idea (perhaps is clear in other articles of yours?) for what reason (s) you would think that way. Because if your research over all the years is giving you conviction HIV is just imaginary, why harp on about aspects of the HIV industry....when it is ALL nefarious intent...just malfeasance writ large.....and the root of the false edifice propogated in our minds has to be expunged fully, the complete structure of the HIV/AIDs horror show mechanism still being invented has to be dismantled and obliterated.
Writing about specific aspects of 'HIV' is nutrition to the EVIL root and the ongoing mechanics of it all otherwise. As it helps make the tissue of lies to continue giving impression of a true reality
For the best summary of my beliefs on HIV, please refer to the piece I wrote in 2006, Why I Quit HIV.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2006/03/rebecca-v-culshaw/why-i-quit-hiv/
The reason that I spend so much time covering the Truvada disaster and the problems with PrEP is because these drugs are being marketed to people and their adverse effects covered up; I think this information is important to disseminate. I am trying to shine a light on the censorship campaigns run by AIDS activists to bury any negative information about these medications, which is ultimately an attempt to deny informed consent to patients. And, crucially, I analyze the *actual* clinical trial data to try and make it crystal clear that the media is outright LYING not only about the dangers of these drugs, but also their efficacy.
And if they’re lying about that, why on earth should we believe them when they say “HIV is the virus that causes AIDS”?
Have read your 2006 article. I felt to cry actually. You detail it so well, and your approach, including your share of your relationship, (of your vulnerability), with 'the HIV propaganded threat' as a child, feels more personable than others who also rail against the Edifice of the HIV Paradigm... more-so acknowledging our 'plight' as deemed PLWHAs. (and one doesnt have to embrace any sense of 'victimhood' in calling it a plight...it is an objective blight according to mainstream global cultural perceptions)
Great Thanks for having the gumption to have quit! As you conclude, indeed it is ALL who ignorantly participate in what can be termed the ' Systemic HIV maraud of harm' who have to (must eventually) see the error of their ways!
I will get your book...and if anyone reading this is in UK, Blackwells have it in stock (UK Amazon not...best avoid them anyway eh)......
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/The-Real-AIDS-Epidemic-by-Rebecca-V-Culshaw-author-Neenyah-Ostrom-foreword/9781510776715
Hi Rebecca, I am seeing this after i commented on your lastest 'Does HIV exist' post. I will check your 'quit' link. Final analysis, the AIDS activists need illuminating they are lost souls, smitten by lies coursing through their veins.... causing untold harm....
So your take is that HIV does not exist
Certainly not in any way shape or form that we have been told! Have you been labelled HIV yourself?
I'm about to do the test but someone close has
Honestly, (and this is just my personal opinion...hope it ok Rebecca i share this on your Substack) you (and your sexual partner?) need take breath, and take stock. If your friend 'someone close' has tested positive that is one too many entered the AIDS zone trap. But if you do your thorough research you will both be liberated from this label, and the psychological consequences of whatever level of 'HIV sense of tarnish'.
You say you are about to test...don't do it. If you have any wonder about the accuracy of PCR to confirm that concept they call covid, or anything else (pcr was only ever intended for lab use, not clinical diagnosis), then extend your querying to the ELISA, Rapid, Western Blot, Viral Load tests, etc for HIV. All are doubtful to be diagnosing anything specific. Do not trust the tests.
All the best in negotiating all this. If your friend is pressurising you to test, you have to put yourself first, to make own choice...and the 2 of you will have to work with that. It will be a great challenge for your relationship but holds great potential if you can get to a truthful point together in all this so loaded space...
I just tested my full blood count which is very low, White blood cell is at 2.2, red at 3.8, Heomoglobin 12.3 everything is Low by critical organs are fine, my skin is pale, so with these results they will demand HIV test
My knowledge (or remembering) of blood work (eg. the ranges of 'normal') is scanty to be taking those figures/markers and make comment. Important aspects are other symptoms/how well you feel generally. Where are you living for it to be legal for a HIV test to be demanded. That is contrary to your rights as a Sovereign human.
I'm
Yeah so much, one does not know what is and what is not?