This is so fascinating. The part that struck me was the part where Paxlovid (the Ritonivir portion), was DESIGNED to slow the liver down. The liver is a detox organ. In Chinese medicine they refer to the liver as The General, because it's in charge of everything. Yes, we need the other organs, but the liver has a central role in the body's entire homeostasis. I follow a doctor who treats all kinds of maladies in people purely by helping them repair liver damage. Western medicine thinks of a healthy liver as something that doesn't have elevated liver enzymes, but he says that sub-clinical liver injury is at the heart of many peoples' health struggles. What he points out was the only thing that made sense to me in my case.
He's developed a fascinating theory called Toxic Bile Theory. Bile is mostly known as a fat emulsifier, that's its widely known function, but in fact the liver dumps toxins of all sorts into the bile and tries to transport them out of the body through the poop. But the liver gets messed up, even mildly, and the bile starts doing things it shouldn't be doing. The bile ducts actually become damaged (leaky) and the bile and all the toxins the body is trying to get rid of instead back up into the bloodstream. This is actually a thing, there are functional tests for this called Serum Bile Acid tests. The more bile acids you have the blood, the sicker you are. Type 2 diabetics have twice as much bile floating around their blood as non-diabetics for instance.
Well, this doctor discovered that all kinds of disease states are associated with this bile in the blood condition, and one of the things that can make something appear short term to seem better is by slowing the liver down, which means less bile is being excreted and thus less backing up where it doesn't belong in the blood and thus making a person sick.
So there we go, Paxlovid slow the liver down giving a person a temporary reprieve from symptoms, and when it's withdrawn, the bile starts flowing again, and in the injured liver state back up into the blood making the person symptomatic again.
His presentations are interesting, they're based on the work of a researcher who back in the 80s I believe discovered this process and has written a bunch of papers on it (Anthony Mawson).
Paxlovid is a temporary fix that ends up making the problem worse in the long run because pharmaceuticals in general cause liver injury and thus this processes called subclinical cholestasis.
Boom. Exactly right. David Rasnick had a paper years ago explaining why the protease inhibitors are so toxic for the liver. I need to find it, it’s worth reading.
I've wondered if 'proto-AIDS' was simply about the livers of these guys being so overwhelmed by toxins that the rest of their body's homeostatic systems were thrown out of whack. This also sounds a lot like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The Western model was to look at what was happening and go into the weeds looking for a specific weed causing their problems, when in fact it was all the weeds. I remember years ago going to a gay bar when I was in my early 20s, and I had no idea was poppers were. I had heard the name, but didn't really know much about them. But the dance floor had this acrid smell, and we were dancing and a friend pulled out this little brown bottle and shoved it under my nose, the smell was terrible and I felt so gross after that and being in that toxic air. I can't imagine guys who were doing it day in and day out for years, some guys couldn't even masturbate without using poppers. This is one of the few things about my rigid religious upbringing that I'm grateful for, it kept me from doing drugs and alcohol.
I tried poppers once when I bartended at a gay sports pub in London in the nineties (I’m Gen X). (Yes those exist, although this one has long since gone out of business.) Someone gave me a cigarette with, like, poppers dropped into the tobacco (I thought it was a regular cigarette until it was too late, and no I don’t smoke anymore, haven’t for years) and I was sick for a day after that. I don’t doubt their toxicity.
Sounds like one of those "don't try this at home" vignettes.
btw...
Technically, it's not needles that junkies share - it's the residual drops of blood they exchange with one another by passing around syringes loaded with their magic potions. Every time they get high this way, they're getting mini blood transplants from strangers.
this is relly great writting !!!!!!!! your telling of real life events is unmatched ------- your personal emprical observation of your envioroment in the moment and also in reflective ((( memerory ))))))) analytical contemplation is spot on ------- i am impressed ---------- and am a new follower of yours
Some have said that Long Covid is the new name for Aids.
Aloe, I encourage you to familiarize yourself with Rebecca’s work. It’s not possible for her to encapsulate the entirity of it in every post. There is such thing as Covid as a reference to human unwellness since humans do and have always had varying degrees of wellness.
Sooner or later Rebecca’s work will focus on the phenomenon which some call Covid since Long Covid or something with a name to that effect will replace the function of deception that was previously known by the name of Aids.
In simple terms however I do agree that there is no such thing as Covid (or of Aids).
Thank you for dragging yourself through this dung pile - patiently explaining forked tongue. A career in the marketing arena (retail and showroom visual presentation - making shit shine) has been the best training ground to realize very little is what it seems.
Excellent revelatory groundwork - loved your line "I’m getting tired of the propaganda, so let’s wrap this up." My sentiments on this entire shit show.
Sorry, but I'm lost and I don't understand this diatribe. There is no Covid there never has been a Covid, so why would you need a drug to treat something that has never existed? Are you kidding me? Have you seen the virus isolated? Have you isolated the virus? Do you believe it even exists you're not helping the situation just say no not only know but hell no!!
One of the things I try to do on this substack is to point out the blatant lies being told us by the medical mainstream, even contradicting the titles of their own papers. Part of this involves pointing out that, even from within the framework of their own paradigm, they are provably lying. If I just say it’s all BS I can’t contradict their own evidence nearly as powerfully.
Thank you, Aloe. I asked her the same question without any answer, and I see that she still will not comment on the proven fact that no such Unicorn as a virus exists. Why won't she just say one way or the other? I get the same from all the other health freedom fighters. No answer, they just ignore it as if I never asked the question, and this of course begs the question why? It appears that they all are afraid of the virus subject, or they are fronting for it by talking about everything else but this. It is a great strategy when you think about it. Millions follow, pay money, believe they are the voices of truth when the real fraud is being protected. Just answer the question! It is not hard. Do they believe in a virus, and if so, please explain why? If not, then please explain why. As I said the Baileys have shown the fraud of virology as they do not use the scientific method to find them.
What else could it be. You actually said this! If not a Unicorn, then what else could it be. The thing is Pete, I do not have to demonstrate anything, I merely point to the videos by the Baileys, and they explain clearly, and scientifically what a fraud it is. As far as how far I am going to get, I have gotten pretty far so far. Have you actually watched the two videos or are you just a troll who attacks people personally? This is the tactic used by people who do not want to see the evidence presented, and you obviously have not looked. I will say that you know nothing about me or what I know about anything so unless you can give an argument other than the one given, shut the hell up!
Rebecca’s substack isn’t about trying to prove what a virus is or isn’t. A better topic to discuss here may be whether science itself can really interact with the principles of virology. Although probably nobody here will say it can. So the real research is to understand how such a myth was created and its role in HIV and now Covid.
this article is as great as it gets --------- thank you -------- your directness and focus leaves no question ??????? on how deadly this drug is and you explain very quickly !!!!!!!!!!! BRAVO WRITTING SKILL I"M very impressed
It seems obvious that these medications suppress the immune system. This creates a temporary improvement, just like systemic steroids such as prednisone and dexamethasone. When steroids are stopped there is a "rebound", which is one reason they are usually tapered gradually over time. This immune suppression would account for "viral loads" going down, and also reducing antibody test positivity such as in "pre-exposure prophylaxis". Suppressing the immune system reduces the chance of testing positive on PCR tests such as "covid tests", "viral load tests", and antibody tests such as "hiv tests". these reductions give a strong placebo effect which helps people overlook and ignore adverse effects. However, we can help generate the power of positive belief healthier ways yes? My favorites are tender-loving-care and chicken soup, or perhaps a different home-made soup of your choice :-)
Rebecca, I asked you a question this week about the fact that viruses do not exist, and I have not received an answer. Do you believe that a creature called a virus exists? I saw your interview on Sam Bailey, and as you know she has proven scientifically that they do not exist. I want you to comment on this one way or the other please, Jack Williams.
Human users of language are apt to to confuse words themselves with the realities that they represent--the phenomenon known as logocentrism. There appears to be some reality that "viruses" can be observed (as micrographs) and some can be separated from their environments into bands with a centrifuge. Apparently however it is not actually possible to "experiment" with such particles, but, in yet another obfuscation of language, laboratory techniques have appropriated the terminology of isolation, pathogenesis, and infectivity, and human politics conspired make such myths tolerable in peer reviewed literature. The notion of one of these viral entities "satisfying Koch's Postulates" is no more practical than shooting rubber bands at the moon. It seems that with regards to the notion of viruses as pathogens, to the degree that modern (largely government funded and sponsored) research has uncovered some associations, there is a group of puppet masters at the top that are diverting the research itself toward a nefarious goal. One must ask, how is it that within the paradigm of "retrovirology," there are only several such viruses that have been uncovered in the human genome in four decades? Isn't the bigger picture a simple observation that preparations of live tissues of animals should not be allowed to end up in the bloodstreams of humans? Under any circumstances? The only constant theme in 100+ years of virology seems to have been an elaborate charade to justify vaccinations. Global finance is in a related spiral of decline, and since it is a sound money system which facilitates specialization in society, it may be that science can only recover to the extent that a sound money circulates, and Bitcoin can fill this void. Genomic sequences, generally, seem to play a role in the mechanics of life, so the mysteries therein are a reasonable research endeavor, but nature doesn't really care about right or wrong, life or death, or existence or nonexistence. Evolution seems to be all that matters. Try not to be one of the expressions that gets too far ahead or too far behind the rest and you'll be fine.
I do not think digital currency is a good thing. As far as viruses are concerned, no proof has been shown to this day! If you watch the Baileys videos, A farewell to virology they show clearly how this fraud is perpetrated, and it is not science.
Two of my wife’s friends have taken “Paxlovid” for “COVID.” As far as I know, they reported nothing except for a bad taste in the mouth. I’m dumbfounded anyone would take this toxin, but many of the people my wife communicates with apparently still buy into the “COVID” narrative.
This is so fascinating. The part that struck me was the part where Paxlovid (the Ritonivir portion), was DESIGNED to slow the liver down. The liver is a detox organ. In Chinese medicine they refer to the liver as The General, because it's in charge of everything. Yes, we need the other organs, but the liver has a central role in the body's entire homeostasis. I follow a doctor who treats all kinds of maladies in people purely by helping them repair liver damage. Western medicine thinks of a healthy liver as something that doesn't have elevated liver enzymes, but he says that sub-clinical liver injury is at the heart of many peoples' health struggles. What he points out was the only thing that made sense to me in my case.
He's developed a fascinating theory called Toxic Bile Theory. Bile is mostly known as a fat emulsifier, that's its widely known function, but in fact the liver dumps toxins of all sorts into the bile and tries to transport them out of the body through the poop. But the liver gets messed up, even mildly, and the bile starts doing things it shouldn't be doing. The bile ducts actually become damaged (leaky) and the bile and all the toxins the body is trying to get rid of instead back up into the bloodstream. This is actually a thing, there are functional tests for this called Serum Bile Acid tests. The more bile acids you have the blood, the sicker you are. Type 2 diabetics have twice as much bile floating around their blood as non-diabetics for instance.
Well, this doctor discovered that all kinds of disease states are associated with this bile in the blood condition, and one of the things that can make something appear short term to seem better is by slowing the liver down, which means less bile is being excreted and thus less backing up where it doesn't belong in the blood and thus making a person sick.
So there we go, Paxlovid slow the liver down giving a person a temporary reprieve from symptoms, and when it's withdrawn, the bile starts flowing again, and in the injured liver state back up into the blood making the person symptomatic again.
His presentations are interesting, they're based on the work of a researcher who back in the 80s I believe discovered this process and has written a bunch of papers on it (Anthony Mawson).
Paxlovid is a temporary fix that ends up making the problem worse in the long run because pharmaceuticals in general cause liver injury and thus this processes called subclinical cholestasis.
Boom. Exactly right. David Rasnick had a paper years ago explaining why the protease inhibitors are so toxic for the liver. I need to find it, it’s worth reading.
I've wondered if 'proto-AIDS' was simply about the livers of these guys being so overwhelmed by toxins that the rest of their body's homeostatic systems were thrown out of whack. This also sounds a lot like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The Western model was to look at what was happening and go into the weeds looking for a specific weed causing their problems, when in fact it was all the weeds. I remember years ago going to a gay bar when I was in my early 20s, and I had no idea was poppers were. I had heard the name, but didn't really know much about them. But the dance floor had this acrid smell, and we were dancing and a friend pulled out this little brown bottle and shoved it under my nose, the smell was terrible and I felt so gross after that and being in that toxic air. I can't imagine guys who were doing it day in and day out for years, some guys couldn't even masturbate without using poppers. This is one of the few things about my rigid religious upbringing that I'm grateful for, it kept me from doing drugs and alcohol.
I tried poppers once when I bartended at a gay sports pub in London in the nineties (I’m Gen X). (Yes those exist, although this one has long since gone out of business.) Someone gave me a cigarette with, like, poppers dropped into the tobacco (I thought it was a regular cigarette until it was too late, and no I don’t smoke anymore, haven’t for years) and I was sick for a day after that. I don’t doubt their toxicity.
Sounds like one of those "don't try this at home" vignettes.
btw...
Technically, it's not needles that junkies share - it's the residual drops of blood they exchange with one another by passing around syringes loaded with their magic potions. Every time they get high this way, they're getting mini blood transplants from strangers.
this is relly great writting !!!!!!!! your telling of real life events is unmatched ------- your personal emprical observation of your envioroment in the moment and also in reflective ((( memerory ))))))) analytical contemplation is spot on ------- i am impressed ---------- and am a new follower of yours
Excellent information… FDA tried to shutdown NAC around the same timeframe due to its ability to aid the liver in detoxifying.. hmmm!
Some have said that Long Covid is the new name for Aids.
Aloe, I encourage you to familiarize yourself with Rebecca’s work. It’s not possible for her to encapsulate the entirity of it in every post. There is such thing as Covid as a reference to human unwellness since humans do and have always had varying degrees of wellness.
Sooner or later Rebecca’s work will focus on the phenomenon which some call Covid since Long Covid or something with a name to that effect will replace the function of deception that was previously known by the name of Aids.
In simple terms however I do agree that there is no such thing as Covid (or of Aids).
Thank you.
Thank you for dragging yourself through this dung pile - patiently explaining forked tongue. A career in the marketing arena (retail and showroom visual presentation - making shit shine) has been the best training ground to realize very little is what it seems.
Excellent revelatory groundwork - loved your line "I’m getting tired of the propaganda, so let’s wrap this up." My sentiments on this entire shit show.
Good evening!
Pure witchcraft.
Yup. I love how the article ADMITS it doesn’t work yet the title indicates the opposite.
Sorry, but I'm lost and I don't understand this diatribe. There is no Covid there never has been a Covid, so why would you need a drug to treat something that has never existed? Are you kidding me? Have you seen the virus isolated? Have you isolated the virus? Do you believe it even exists you're not helping the situation just say no not only know but hell no!!
One of the things I try to do on this substack is to point out the blatant lies being told us by the medical mainstream, even contradicting the titles of their own papers. Part of this involves pointing out that, even from within the framework of their own paradigm, they are provably lying. If I just say it’s all BS I can’t contradict their own evidence nearly as powerfully.
Thank you, Aloe. I asked her the same question without any answer, and I see that she still will not comment on the proven fact that no such Unicorn as a virus exists. Why won't she just say one way or the other? I get the same from all the other health freedom fighters. No answer, they just ignore it as if I never asked the question, and this of course begs the question why? It appears that they all are afraid of the virus subject, or they are fronting for it by talking about everything else but this. It is a great strategy when you think about it. Millions follow, pay money, believe they are the voices of truth when the real fraud is being protected. Just answer the question! It is not hard. Do they believe in a virus, and if so, please explain why? If not, then please explain why. As I said the Baileys have shown the fraud of virology as they do not use the scientific method to find them.
Apparently, you're not gonna get far with no-virus until you can demonstrate more plausible etiologies.
"What else could it be if not a virus?" is a pretty common response.
What else could it be. You actually said this! If not a Unicorn, then what else could it be. The thing is Pete, I do not have to demonstrate anything, I merely point to the videos by the Baileys, and they explain clearly, and scientifically what a fraud it is. As far as how far I am going to get, I have gotten pretty far so far. Have you actually watched the two videos or are you just a troll who attacks people personally? This is the tactic used by people who do not want to see the evidence presented, and you obviously have not looked. I will say that you know nothing about me or what I know about anything so unless you can give an argument other than the one given, shut the hell up!
Sorry, my apologies - I created a misunderstanding.
What I mean is, for those of us proselytizing the no-virus paradigm, success will seem to depend upon presenting alternate explanations for illness.
In other words, it's for people to shake off the virus paradigm unless they have something solid to replace it with.
Rebecca’s substack isn’t about trying to prove what a virus is or isn’t. A better topic to discuss here may be whether science itself can really interact with the principles of virology. Although probably nobody here will say it can. So the real research is to understand how such a myth was created and its role in HIV and now Covid.
this article is as great as it gets --------- thank you -------- your directness and focus leaves no question ??????? on how deadly this drug is and you explain very quickly !!!!!!!!!!! BRAVO WRITTING SKILL I"M very impressed
Maybe Covid is a STD
It seems obvious that these medications suppress the immune system. This creates a temporary improvement, just like systemic steroids such as prednisone and dexamethasone. When steroids are stopped there is a "rebound", which is one reason they are usually tapered gradually over time. This immune suppression would account for "viral loads" going down, and also reducing antibody test positivity such as in "pre-exposure prophylaxis". Suppressing the immune system reduces the chance of testing positive on PCR tests such as "covid tests", "viral load tests", and antibody tests such as "hiv tests". these reductions give a strong placebo effect which helps people overlook and ignore adverse effects. However, we can help generate the power of positive belief healthier ways yes? My favorites are tender-loving-care and chicken soup, or perhaps a different home-made soup of your choice :-)
Rebecca, I asked you a question this week about the fact that viruses do not exist, and I have not received an answer. Do you believe that a creature called a virus exists? I saw your interview on Sam Bailey, and as you know she has proven scientifically that they do not exist. I want you to comment on this one way or the other please, Jack Williams.
Human users of language are apt to to confuse words themselves with the realities that they represent--the phenomenon known as logocentrism. There appears to be some reality that "viruses" can be observed (as micrographs) and some can be separated from their environments into bands with a centrifuge. Apparently however it is not actually possible to "experiment" with such particles, but, in yet another obfuscation of language, laboratory techniques have appropriated the terminology of isolation, pathogenesis, and infectivity, and human politics conspired make such myths tolerable in peer reviewed literature. The notion of one of these viral entities "satisfying Koch's Postulates" is no more practical than shooting rubber bands at the moon. It seems that with regards to the notion of viruses as pathogens, to the degree that modern (largely government funded and sponsored) research has uncovered some associations, there is a group of puppet masters at the top that are diverting the research itself toward a nefarious goal. One must ask, how is it that within the paradigm of "retrovirology," there are only several such viruses that have been uncovered in the human genome in four decades? Isn't the bigger picture a simple observation that preparations of live tissues of animals should not be allowed to end up in the bloodstreams of humans? Under any circumstances? The only constant theme in 100+ years of virology seems to have been an elaborate charade to justify vaccinations. Global finance is in a related spiral of decline, and since it is a sound money system which facilitates specialization in society, it may be that science can only recover to the extent that a sound money circulates, and Bitcoin can fill this void. Genomic sequences, generally, seem to play a role in the mechanics of life, so the mysteries therein are a reasonable research endeavor, but nature doesn't really care about right or wrong, life or death, or existence or nonexistence. Evolution seems to be all that matters. Try not to be one of the expressions that gets too far ahead or too far behind the rest and you'll be fine.
I do not think digital currency is a good thing. As far as viruses are concerned, no proof has been shown to this day! If you watch the Baileys videos, A farewell to virology they show clearly how this fraud is perpetrated, and it is not science.
Two of my wife’s friends have taken “Paxlovid” for “COVID.” As far as I know, they reported nothing except for a bad taste in the mouth. I’m dumbfounded anyone would take this toxin, but many of the people my wife communicates with apparently still buy into the “COVID” narrative.