From a reader, reprinted with permission (sometimes comments get sent directly to my email), “ They are both frauds, not "disasters", simple as that. :)”
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
Agreed. People were really dying, but the whole situation was made way worse by AZT and also ignoring evidence from people like Duesberg and the Perth Group that could have saved people.
Agreed, but the main issue is that in 1981 the CDC had all the data and evidence it needed to tell the small %age of sexually active gay males what was the root cause of AIDS and how to prevent themselves developing it. AIDS is a syndrome not a disease, it isn't infectious or contagious.
Acquired Immune Failure is not a myth. A “newly discovered retrovirus” eventually called hiv as the cause of sexually transmitted epidemic immune failure disease is a myth.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
"...AIDS... Fast forward nearly forty years to 'Covid-19', and what does one find? The same scare tactics, the same contradictions, the same wrong predictions, the same bogus tests, the same deadly treatment approach, all this but more global, more coordinated, and even more socially destructive. And the General leading the charge? Anthony Fauci..."
I really love the rebranding of "Unmasking Covid" - it can bring a whole bunch of new people into the movement. I really appreciate what you've been doing for 2+ decades.
Been Rethinking AIDS since first reading AIDS Acquired By Drug Consumption and Other Non-contagious Risk Factors by Dr Duesberg in March or April 1987. Saved my life when following an hiv antibodies test in November 1987 the clinic recommended I immediately begin AZT treatment. First person I knew personally to die of “AIDS” was two years later. He had secretly been taking AZT for a number of months to fight the “hiv” positive status he also kept secret from his multiple lovers. Have lost countless friends and heroes to “AIDS” since. One thing they all had in common was following prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Hi Brother S. So happy to hear you chose the life-saving path and are here to share your incredible story with others. (You're thinking of Duesberg's ground-breaking 1987 paper Retroviruses as Carcinogens and Pathogens: Expectations and Reality. The Non-Contagious Risk Factors paper was published in 1992.) I was the Executive Director of HEAL (Health Education AIDS Liaison) at the time, and one of the many horrifying and telling observations that one could not turn away from was the fact that the people who were recovering from "AIDS" were the ones WITHOUT health insurance.
Thanks for the clarification. Obsessive study since 1987 leads to some blurring regarding the date and origin of some sources. Wish could figure out where i learned the true cause of the death of Ryan White being unstoppable internal bleeding.
There used to be a paper available on RethinkingAIDS.com that detailed how ARVs will work to improve the health/wellbeing of the recipient for a while and the long term deleterious influence of continued use but that writing seems impossible to locate these days. At least for a neo-Luddite like myself. Any chance You might know where it could be found?
Why doesn’t Rethinking AIDS/Unmasking Covid have links to the incredible Infectious Myth work by former RA President David Crowe? Especially his eerily prescient Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory? http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
Fair question, complex answer. We've lost our tech guy and haven't found a replacement for him yet. Still not clear what happened with the excellent infectiousmyth site, though the wayback machine has the summaries for the shows, but unfortunately without the actual podcasts: https://web.archive.org/web/20230727093035/https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/
However, you can still access some of the excellent How Positive Are You podcasts here:
- Development and free trialing of dangerous drugs with no proper safety mechanisms or oversight
- suspicion of govt involvement in development of the viruses
- censorship off and take-down of anyone suggesting alternatve narratives
- criminal repression of eveyone speaking out
These are dangerous times when so many if not all the arms of government are so thoroughly corrupted they are willing to experiment with people's lives.
Everything. AIDS was the trial run. Although, that said, I think they are banking on the fact that after 40 years most of the population believes the HIV theory and that they're not finished with that one just yet.
And the fact that most people still beLIEve the hiv/AIDS Theory is true because the syndrome that in 1984 was predicted to have decimated the human population by turn of the last century still hasn’t touched their life personally. If the average person actually knew as many people living with/dead from “hiv/AIDS” as I have personally known since 1989 they would recognize that the one thing they all have in common is following prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Hiv/aids was the dress rehearsal, targeted at a fringe sub-population, for Covid which is the main show, directed at the general public. I mean this in terms of propaganda, profit and technical execution (if that’s the word I want)
"Covid" is an expanded model of the same business plan as AIDS: no virus, no defined disease, no actual syndrome, abuse of the PCR and "diagnostic testing," and mass panic -- with the underlying causes of any illness associated with toxic exposure and drug reactions.
To "have AIDS," no clinical symptoms are needed; all that must happen is a bullshit antigen positive, and slightly low T-cell count. That is not a syndrome or a disease.
Hi Eric. Thank you for replying. I was thinking more of the early AIDS cases which I have researched very carefully for my forthcoming books, the thriller 'A Dive Into Darkness' and the non-fiction book 'CasCAIDS - The shocking true story of how a clique of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic. '
'Given the range of infections to which AIDS patients are potentially susceptible, we were surprised by the rather characteristic and relatively uniform patterns of infectious diseases that we encountered in our autopsy series and in the literature.'
I suppose that was the point I was making - the conditions associated with AIDS in the early 80s were consistent.
AIDS is real, HIV is fake.
I would love the opportunity to talk with you about my 3 years' research into HIV/AIDS.
Paul, the early cases were mostly immune devastation from snorting solvents, consuming antibiotics, eating amphetamines, self-induced starvation, and deep enemas that washed out the immune system. That is not AIDS. AIDS is not real; it's a drug marketing campaign.
I agree with you about immune system burn out / devastation. That is the conclusion I came to two years ago. I am saying there was a common syndrome of medical diseases / conditions brought on by immune system burn out caused by immune system overload. The same syndrome of medical diseases / conditions was seen in transplant patients in the 60s and 70s and in a famous case in England in 1959.
I disagree entirely with the 'new disease, new virus' HIV causes AIDS mantra and I know that the scientific evidence for the existence of a killer retrovirus called HIV-1 put forward by Montagnier and Gallo is a castle made of sand.
People were encouraged to have healthy lifestyles to prevent AIDS. But people were encouraged to have unhealthy lifestyles to prevent COVID-19.
People with AIDS were treated with respect by doctors, even if the doctor was shit-scared of AIDS. People who didn't want to wear a mask were told they were murderers.
Government and the medical profession discouraged fearfulness about AIDS, but they encouraged fearfulness about C19.
Nobody was allowed to enquire about your HIV status. But for a time, it was compulsory to declare your C19 vaccination status.
Everyone knew that AIDS was here to stay, but nobody suggested that society be turned upside down for it. C19 is also here to stay, but even though Zero COVID is no longer pursued by policy makers, unnecessary and harmful restrictions are still in the government toolkit.
In the 1980s, people were told to listen to AIDS patients. Today, people are told to trust selected medical professionals.
I'm not. But, corona viruses do exist, so it's not a stretch to believe that SARS-CoV-2 exists. You can treat C19 with Ivermectin etc, so this implies some kind of viral infection. Just IMHO.
It's a rhetorical device. If you can be generous to an opposing viewpoint, and your viewpoint still seems like the better one, then your position is strong indeed.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
If you think “People with AIDS were treated with respect by doctors” you clearly were not there or not paying attention during the AIDS era. People with AIDS were shunned and abandoned by doctors. There was talk and encouragement among the most homophobic political and social influencers of tattooing AIDS patients, those who test positive for the biological markers considered synonymous with infection and even those “sympathetic” to the issue for potential quarantine and removal from society. It was at a “healthcare professionals” conference in the early 1990s when I witnessed a “doctor” telling an attentive group about performing CPR on an AIDS patient. The listeners shocked and fearful gasps turned to giggling sighs when the “doctor” mimed stepping on the chest of an invisible body lying on the floor and counted “One, two, three...”. It was that moment that sealed my contempt for the “healthcare” industry. AIDS patients were NOT “treated with respect”.
The “messaging” stigmatized gays as carriers of a sexually transmitted disease due to their excessively promiscuous sexual practices. How was that “responsible and professional”? The messaging in 1987 was that by 1990 “one in five heterosexuals” would be dead or dying from hiv. “responsible and professional”?
From 1987 NYTimes When Doctors Refuse To Treat AIDS “But among dentists in Chicago, so few are willing to accept AIDS patients that the Chicago Dental Society is considering setting up a special clinic. And a quarter of 258 doctors in training at New York hospitals said recently they thought it was ethical to refuse to treat people infected with the AIDS virus. When even medically trained people ignore medical evidence and succumb to panic, they set a miserable example for others in society who must deal with the disease and its carriers.” https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/03/opinion/when-doctors-refuse-to-treat-aids.html
The medical establishment demonized, discriminated against and turned their backs on patients suffering from GRID/AIDS. Were you even alive in the 80s? Doesn’t sound like you were.
Oh I was, but I was a child. So maybe my memory is not as accurate as it should be. Plus, I live in Australia, and things were different here perhaps. Although you may have seen the Grim Reaper commercials that we had here?
Here's another interesting parallel that just dawned on me. Masks and condoms. What intervention did both give rise to? Cover it to stay healthy and stay alive
And in both cases, this intervention has caused a kind of rebellion. Not as visibly in the LGBT community with condoms but I can tell you we reached condom fatigue and safe-sex 'be safe' lecture fatigue about a decade ago, much like a lot of people are over masks and being lectured about them.
Another parallel, both gave rise to separating people from each other.
Guys, if you want to claim your FREE pre-publication copy of the manuscript to 'A Dive Into Darkness', a thriller based upon my 3 years research into the origins of AIDS, set in Paris over 5 days in March/April 2027, please reply to this, or email paulfranks99@hotmail.com Best wishes, Paul
I was alone for the early part of the pandemic and had a chance to process a theme in my life: guilt. My definition for it is the feeling that one does not live up to a standard. How guilt was used during HIV and C-19 was a lie to its core. The introduction of an impossible standard one had to live up to by making sexual intimacy dangerous and forbidden (“you are a bad person if you have sex because you can catch AIDS from anyone and give it to anyone), and then making just breathing dangerous and forbidden (“you could be an asymptomatic spreader and kill grandmothers”).
An altruistic, transparent, non-manipulative public health emergency would include straight-shooting, admission of what is known and unknown, and the message that cooler heads prevail. Both AIDS and Covid spoke to us as flawed individuals who were teetering on the edge of giving into selfish whims and killing others in the process. Truly biblical, if you think about it.
Guilt is a lie to the core because it is based on the idea of a perfect model. Since there is no such thing, any guilt-inducing campaign is a lie to its core.
Both were money driven frauds run by the medical industrial complex. Pharma being a cash cow for the MIC. As billy gates told us the profit margins are incredible.
From a reader, reprinted with permission (sometimes comments get sent directly to my email), “ They are both frauds, not "disasters", simple as that. :)”
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Whose qoute is this Dr Cowan?
If you are asking about my hiv/AIDS/covid comparison it is not a quote from anyone.
My words.
I wrote them.
Not quoting anyone.
OK that is great
AIDS was not a fraud. HIV-1 was / is.
Agreed. People were really dying, but the whole situation was made way worse by AZT and also ignoring evidence from people like Duesberg and the Perth Group that could have saved people.
Agreed, but the main issue is that in 1981 the CDC had all the data and evidence it needed to tell the small %age of sexually active gay males what was the root cause of AIDS and how to prevent themselves developing it. AIDS is a syndrome not a disease, it isn't infectious or contagious.
Acquired Immune Failure is not a myth. A “newly discovered retrovirus” eventually called hiv as the cause of sexually transmitted epidemic immune failure disease is a myth.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Satanthony Fauci brings you th next new scamdemic serenade...
Rhapsody in Harmacide....
He does seem to conveniently appear in suspicious places. 😇
PCR tests used to diagnose asymptomatic supposed carriers of either virus.
Fear of the infected and isolation of infected individuals creating a stigma and shame for the infected.
Media sensationalism of both telling us we could die if we contracted the virus and developed AIDS or COVID.
Restriction of international travel if one was diagnosed with either.
Confusion about the origin of either virus resulting in many stories about both.
The cure actually killed more than the disease would have. - AZT for AIDS and the respirators for COVID.
No promotion from the government of healthy lifestyles of a proper diet, sunshine and exercise for prevention and treatment.
A brainwashed public demanding treatments vaccines for COVID and drugs for AIDS
Anyone who questioned the official story was labeled a quack and discounted.
Public sympathy and adornment of the infected.
Questionable numbers of deaths from either.
Has the Coronavirus indeed been shown to produce Covid? If not that would be a similarity with AIDS and HIV.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Hi Rebecca. Here is an article on that very subject from our Unmasking Covid and AIDS group:
https://rethinkingaids.com/index.php/introduction
by Tom DiFerdinando
"...AIDS... Fast forward nearly forty years to 'Covid-19', and what does one find? The same scare tactics, the same contradictions, the same wrong predictions, the same bogus tests, the same deadly treatment approach, all this but more global, more coordinated, and even more socially destructive. And the General leading the charge? Anthony Fauci..."
I really love the rebranding of "Unmasking Covid" - it can bring a whole bunch of new people into the movement. I really appreciate what you've been doing for 2+ decades.
Been Rethinking AIDS since first reading AIDS Acquired By Drug Consumption and Other Non-contagious Risk Factors by Dr Duesberg in March or April 1987. Saved my life when following an hiv antibodies test in November 1987 the clinic recommended I immediately begin AZT treatment. First person I knew personally to die of “AIDS” was two years later. He had secretly been taking AZT for a number of months to fight the “hiv” positive status he also kept secret from his multiple lovers. Have lost countless friends and heroes to “AIDS” since. One thing they all had in common was following prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Hi Brother S. So happy to hear you chose the life-saving path and are here to share your incredible story with others. (You're thinking of Duesberg's ground-breaking 1987 paper Retroviruses as Carcinogens and Pathogens: Expectations and Reality. The Non-Contagious Risk Factors paper was published in 1992.) I was the Executive Director of HEAL (Health Education AIDS Liaison) at the time, and one of the many horrifying and telling observations that one could not turn away from was the fact that the people who were recovering from "AIDS" were the ones WITHOUT health insurance.
Thanks for the clarification. Obsessive study since 1987 leads to some blurring regarding the date and origin of some sources. Wish could figure out where i learned the true cause of the death of Ryan White being unstoppable internal bleeding.
There used to be a paper available on RethinkingAIDS.com that detailed how ARVs will work to improve the health/wellbeing of the recipient for a while and the long term deleterious influence of continued use but that writing seems impossible to locate these days. At least for a neo-Luddite like myself. Any chance You might know where it could be found?
Why doesn’t Rethinking AIDS/Unmasking Covid have links to the incredible Infectious Myth work by former RA President David Crowe? Especially his eerily prescient Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory? http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
Fair question, complex answer. We've lost our tech guy and haven't found a replacement for him yet. Still not clear what happened with the excellent infectiousmyth site, though the wayback machine has the summaries for the shows, but unfortunately without the actual podcasts: https://web.archive.org/web/20230727093035/https://infectiousmyth.podbean.com/
However, you can still access some of the excellent How Positive Are You podcasts here:
https://howpositiveareyou.com
A version of the coronavirus paper is still here:
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist
And here is more info and some more links - some since broken - to David's excellent work:
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/the-quiet-one-david-crowe-died-one
- Fauci,
- Pharmaceutical profiteering
- Development and free trialing of dangerous drugs with no proper safety mechanisms or oversight
- suspicion of govt involvement in development of the viruses
- censorship off and take-down of anyone suggesting alternatve narratives
- criminal repression of eveyone speaking out
These are dangerous times when so many if not all the arms of government are so thoroughly corrupted they are willing to experiment with people's lives.
Everything. AIDS was the trial run. Although, that said, I think they are banking on the fact that after 40 years most of the population believes the HIV theory and that they're not finished with that one just yet.
And the fact that most people still beLIEve the hiv/AIDS Theory is true because the syndrome that in 1984 was predicted to have decimated the human population by turn of the last century still hasn’t touched their life personally. If the average person actually knew as many people living with/dead from “hiv/AIDS” as I have personally known since 1989 they would recognize that the one thing they all have in common is following prescribed treatment for an often undetectable phantom.
Please see my previous comment comparing hiv/AIDS and covid as it would probably be inappropriate to post it more than twice.
Hiv/aids was the dress rehearsal, targeted at a fringe sub-population, for Covid which is the main show, directed at the general public. I mean this in terms of propaganda, profit and technical execution (if that’s the word I want)
News fear porn, RT-PCR, Anthony Fauci and a Pharma only solution.
"Covid" is an expanded model of the same business plan as AIDS: no virus, no defined disease, no actual syndrome, abuse of the PCR and "diagnostic testing," and mass panic -- with the underlying causes of any illness associated with toxic exposure and drug reactions.
'No actual syndrome' - re AIDS I'm not sure about that Eric.
To "have AIDS," no clinical symptoms are needed; all that must happen is a bullshit antigen positive, and slightly low T-cell count. That is not a syndrome or a disease.
Hi Eric. Thank you for replying. I was thinking more of the early AIDS cases which I have researched very carefully for my forthcoming books, the thriller 'A Dive Into Darkness' and the non-fiction book 'CasCAIDS - The shocking true story of how a clique of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic. '
This paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1916399/pdf/amjpathol00192-0119.pdf is very informative and states that
'Given the range of infections to which AIDS patients are potentially susceptible, we were surprised by the rather characteristic and relatively uniform patterns of infectious diseases that we encountered in our autopsy series and in the literature.'
I suppose that was the point I was making - the conditions associated with AIDS in the early 80s were consistent.
AIDS is real, HIV is fake.
I would love the opportunity to talk with you about my 3 years' research into HIV/AIDS.
Best wishes,
Paul
Paul, the early cases were mostly immune devastation from snorting solvents, consuming antibiotics, eating amphetamines, self-induced starvation, and deep enemas that washed out the immune system. That is not AIDS. AIDS is not real; it's a drug marketing campaign.
Hi Eric.
I agree with you about immune system burn out / devastation. That is the conclusion I came to two years ago. I am saying there was a common syndrome of medical diseases / conditions brought on by immune system burn out caused by immune system overload. The same syndrome of medical diseases / conditions was seen in transplant patients in the 60s and 70s and in a famous case in England in 1959.
I disagree entirely with the 'new disease, new virus' HIV causes AIDS mantra and I know that the scientific evidence for the existence of a killer retrovirus called HIV-1 put forward by Montagnier and Gallo is a castle made of sand.
All the best, Paul
They are almost the opposite.
HIV doesn't exist. SARS-CoV-2 does.
People were encouraged to have healthy lifestyles to prevent AIDS. But people were encouraged to have unhealthy lifestyles to prevent COVID-19.
People with AIDS were treated with respect by doctors, even if the doctor was shit-scared of AIDS. People who didn't want to wear a mask were told they were murderers.
Government and the medical profession discouraged fearfulness about AIDS, but they encouraged fearfulness about C19.
Nobody was allowed to enquire about your HIV status. But for a time, it was compulsory to declare your C19 vaccination status.
Everyone knew that AIDS was here to stay, but nobody suggested that society be turned upside down for it. C19 is also here to stay, but even though Zero COVID is no longer pursued by policy makers, unnecessary and harmful restrictions are still in the government toolkit.
In the 1980s, people were told to listen to AIDS patients. Today, people are told to trust selected medical professionals.
What makes you so certain “SARS-CoV-2 does” exist as an infectious disease causing agent?
I'm not. But, corona viruses do exist, so it's not a stretch to believe that SARS-CoV-2 exists. You can treat C19 with Ivermectin etc, so this implies some kind of viral infection. Just IMHO.
“so it’s not a stretch to believe that SARS-CoV-2 exists” is NOT science.
It's not supposed to be a scientific statement. I'm being as generous as I can to the opposing viewpoint.
Why are you being so generous to the opposing viewpoint?
It's a rhetorical device. If you can be generous to an opposing viewpoint, and your viewpoint still seems like the better one, then your position is strong indeed.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Treated with Respect by who? Both conditions have lead to stigma and isolation
If you think “People with AIDS were treated with respect by doctors” you clearly were not there or not paying attention during the AIDS era. People with AIDS were shunned and abandoned by doctors. There was talk and encouragement among the most homophobic political and social influencers of tattooing AIDS patients, those who test positive for the biological markers considered synonymous with infection and even those “sympathetic” to the issue for potential quarantine and removal from society. It was at a “healthcare professionals” conference in the early 1990s when I witnessed a “doctor” telling an attentive group about performing CPR on an AIDS patient. The listeners shocked and fearful gasps turned to giggling sighs when the “doctor” mimed stepping on the chest of an invisible body lying on the floor and counted “One, two, three...”. It was that moment that sealed my contempt for the “healthcare” industry. AIDS patients were NOT “treated with respect”.
Okay, I believe you for sure. But the messaging, at the least, was responsible and professional.
The “messaging” stigmatized gays as carriers of a sexually transmitted disease due to their excessively promiscuous sexual practices. How was that “responsible and professional”? The messaging in 1987 was that by 1990 “one in five heterosexuals” would be dead or dying from hiv. “responsible and professional”?
It's relative. Compared to C19, the AIDS response was a masterclass in medical professionalism.
From 1987 NYTimes When Doctors Refuse To Treat AIDS “But among dentists in Chicago, so few are willing to accept AIDS patients that the Chicago Dental Society is considering setting up a special clinic. And a quarter of 258 doctors in training at New York hospitals said recently they thought it was ethical to refuse to treat people infected with the AIDS virus. When even medically trained people ignore medical evidence and succumb to panic, they set a miserable example for others in society who must deal with the disease and its carriers.” https://www.nytimes.com/1987/08/03/opinion/when-doctors-refuse-to-treat-aids.html
Good lord. Maybe it was different here in Australia. I was still in primary school though.
The medical establishment demonized, discriminated against and turned their backs on patients suffering from GRID/AIDS. Were you even alive in the 80s? Doesn’t sound like you were.
Oh I was, but I was a child. So maybe my memory is not as accurate as it should be. Plus, I live in Australia, and things were different here perhaps. Although you may have seen the Grim Reaper commercials that we had here?
Here's another interesting parallel that just dawned on me. Masks and condoms. What intervention did both give rise to? Cover it to stay healthy and stay alive
And in both cases, this intervention has caused a kind of rebellion. Not as visibly in the LGBT community with condoms but I can tell you we reached condom fatigue and safe-sex 'be safe' lecture fatigue about a decade ago, much like a lot of people are over masks and being lectured about them.
Another parallel, both gave rise to separating people from each other.
“Safe sex” and “social distancing” are Orwellian Ministry of Health Information/Propaganda Newspeak for Divide and Conquer.
Masks and condoms. It was all about causing fear of the other as a deadly threat.
the media propaganda together with the health bureaucrats generating fear throughout the global population
AIDS came from Bushmeat in a Bathhouse.
Covid came from Batsoup in a Wet Market
AIDS came to the US because of Cruising
Covid came to the US on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship
You can stop AIDS by wearing a Condom
You can stop Covid by wearing a face Condom
Anthony Fauci killed Roy Cohn with AZT
Anthony Fauci killed Roy Horn with Remdesivir
AIDS had a patient Zero: Gaetan Dugas
Covid had a patient Zero: Jeffrey Epstein (who had AIDS in dying. It was the Epstein-barr virus!)
AIDS is caused by a Retrovirus
Covid is cured by an artificial retrovirus (mRNA "vaccine")
Tom Hanks had AIDS in Philadelphia
Tom Hanks was the first Celebrety Covid patient
AIDS is just pneumonia given a new name
Covid is just pneumonia given a new name.
Guys, if you want to claim your FREE pre-publication copy of the manuscript to 'A Dive Into Darkness', a thriller based upon my 3 years research into the origins of AIDS, set in Paris over 5 days in March/April 2027, please reply to this, or email paulfranks99@hotmail.com Best wishes, Paul
I was alone for the early part of the pandemic and had a chance to process a theme in my life: guilt. My definition for it is the feeling that one does not live up to a standard. How guilt was used during HIV and C-19 was a lie to its core. The introduction of an impossible standard one had to live up to by making sexual intimacy dangerous and forbidden (“you are a bad person if you have sex because you can catch AIDS from anyone and give it to anyone), and then making just breathing dangerous and forbidden (“you could be an asymptomatic spreader and kill grandmothers”).
An altruistic, transparent, non-manipulative public health emergency would include straight-shooting, admission of what is known and unknown, and the message that cooler heads prevail. Both AIDS and Covid spoke to us as flawed individuals who were teetering on the edge of giving into selfish whims and killing others in the process. Truly biblical, if you think about it.
Guilt is a lie to the core because it is based on the idea of a perfect model. Since there is no such thing, any guilt-inducing campaign is a lie to its core.
Both were money driven frauds run by the medical industrial complex. Pharma being a cash cow for the MIC. As billy gates told us the profit margins are incredible.