33 Comments

I have a family member who underwent a mastectomy (her mom had breast cancer) on the advice of an MD friend who is a cancer surgeon.

My experience in the scientific research field was that most of my colleagues had great fear of any so-called condition that medicine told them they should fear.

My first awakening to that fact was a lunchtime discussion of ~15 healthy, active, young scientists (in their 20's and 30's) in which I was the only person who did not know my cholesterol, LDL, and HDL levels. And worried about it. And treated it as recommended. Bizarre.

Fear drives many to foolish behavior, so no surprise that people would take any deadly thing medicine tells them to.

Expand full comment

If hepatitis-c is “cured” and requires no further drug treatment when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?

If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.

As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.

  If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?

 Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.

For the common good.

Expand full comment

1) The antibody testing has been phased-out?

2) "why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment "

When the nucleoside analogues are stopped the 'virus' load returns to detectable range and the T cells continue to decline. Apparently that's important.

3) It's very interesting how the Hep-C case is a different one. After giving the cure for Hep-C, does the liver revive?

Expand full comment

Not certain your implication with “virus” or “load returns to detectable range”. What exactly do you understand “viral load” to mean? How is “viral load” determined? Can you provide certification for purified isolate of the “virus” called “hiv” from a patient suffering illness as required to establish a Gold Standard for “hiv” tWhen, where and how was a Gold Standard for diagnostic testing of “hiv” established? What exactly are “hiv” tests testing for?

Expand full comment

"virus" load.

Expand full comment

How is “virus” load determined? Again, when, where, how and by who was a Gold Standard established for “hiv” “virus” testing verification?

Expand full comment

Is there a difference between “virus” load and viral load?

Expand full comment

I place "virus" in quotation marks for two reasons:

1) "virus" is only a theory that's never been rigorously proven

2) Although "viral load" (or "virus load") is often taken to be measuring viable virus particles ("virions"), at best the method can only be taken to indicate an amount of nucleic acids bearing a specific set of sequences. Although it's called "viral load" it's actually misnomer because at best it's only measuring nucleic acids presumed to represent a virus genome; there's actually no intact or infectious virus particles being measured but only small, dissociated fragments of a particular "virus". A better way to say "viral load" would be to say: "virus fragments".

.

Did I get it right?

Expand full comment

Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.

Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.

Silence dissent.

Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.

Silence dissent

Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.

Silence dissent

Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.

Silence dissent

 SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.

  Both are a LIE.

If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?

If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.

As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.

  If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?

 Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.

For the common good.

How are people not seeing through this bs?

Expand full comment

Yes you did get it right. Viral/virus theory is purely theory. There is no actual “hiv” test because the theoretical “hiv” “virus” has never been shown to exist in a human. Are you debating me or supporting my nearly 40 years of dissent to the “hiv”/AIDS THEORY.

Expand full comment

They already doing this. Paxlovid is a repurposed drug previously used for chemotherapy, approved under EUA, to be taken prophylactically for so-called Covid,

Expand full comment

The Plannedemic: RFK Jr ATTACKED For Saying COVID-19 Pandemic ‘May’ Have Been Planned?! Featuring Pre-Planning & Predictive Programming (NurembergTrials.net) https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/the-plannedemic-rfk-jr-attacked-for

Expand full comment

I know with certainty that I will never have cancer and I am near 73 years old (male). Why do I know this? I know the science and have proven it on myself and others that prevents cancer from lifestyle.

I also know from the little known words of Christ who said that if you lived correctly "you will never see disease" The Essene Gospel of Peace - look it up. Christ's protocol for eating was specific to the position of the SUN. Around 2017/2018 Dr.Satchin Panda (Salk Inst.) PROVED that, as he said, "WHEN you eat is MORE IMPORTANT than WHAT you eat." In answer a hypothetical from a researcher/interviewer, he said these stunning words: "Sadly it is better to eat an unhealthy meal during the day because eating later in the evening turns even highly nutritious food into JUNK." He explain junk with this: eating too late or the wrong foods too close to sundown create "excess circulating glucose (ECG) in the blood. As the sun sets, melatonin is produced to make us sleep but the pancreas notices that melatonin so it start to "go to sleep" and doesn't release INSULIN to get rid of the ECG. THat ECG CAUSES inflammation to the one-cell-thin endothelial lining of all blood vessels CONTINUOUSLY ALL NIGHT. And inflammation can spread to surrounding tissues, organs, etc. AND science knows that the blood-brain-barrier cannot protect the brain from "inflammation coming via the blood." And what is at the root of all illness: "Inflammation."

Now inflamed endothelial lining cells will be less porous and pliable thus inhibiting the transfer of OXYGEN from lungs, to blood, to tissues. And in return waste products (CO2,lactic acid, etc.) is also impeded, for removal, by inflamed endothelial tissues. Thus one produces a lower oxygen, high acidic environment where glucose/sugar is abundant.

Or as Hippocrates said 2,400 years ago "If YOU are sick and still eating, YOU are feeding your illness. Stop eating and YOU will heal."

In that Gospel above, Christ advocated that you not "put death into your body." So no meat and no cooking of foods. Instead he advocated eating the life of plants, grasses, seeds, etc. And never eat after sundown. So his low sugar diet and never eat late restriction would avoid ECG. And Christ said you will never see disease. This was virtually proven by the written history of Josephus, from the 1st C.E. AD. He said the Essene lived a very different life - to themselves. But they were "long lived" and "nearly devoid of illness." Two sources that have read Josephus (i haven't yet) said that he wrote that "many of the Essene elders are over 100 years of age" and the other said that he wrote that "the Essene live on average to 120 years of age." Folks, this isn't new. A British Lieutenant, who lived with the Cherokee Indians for several months in 1762, wrote in his autobiography that "the elders (eldest) are around 150 years and still quite active." He also observed that "even the older women do things that I am not physically capable of". He was a very fit soldier, age 35 who had walked over 100 miles to live with the Cherokee, per a treaty arrangement. He knew the Chief "Ostenaco'

Folks, cancer is not "normal". Just like COVID19 was NOT a natural virus. Just like the mRNA Vaccines were not safe and effective. Cancer is an industry. I told the above to a stranger on a golf course. I figured he wasn't listening. FOUR WEEKS later he saw me again on that course. He told me he had listened. He said "I am 73 years old. I have been a type II diabetic for 20 years, taking insulin often. After that golf round I figured I had nothing to lose so I said to myself "Do what that man said he does". "I had tried everything for years all to no avail." After one week he realized that his AM glucose test score EACH morning was slightly lower than the prior morning. A steady constant decline IN THE FIRST 7 DAYS. His body was not being inflamed THUS was healing. Four weeks later, when he found me again, he said THAT morning his glucose was 78 and, in tears said, "I haven't seen such a low number in a VERY long time. I now believe that I will be getting off of these drugs and will live a much better life than I had feared." Read Hippocrates' words above again. 'IF you are sick and still eating (especially after sundown) YOU are feeding your illness. Stop eating (too close to or after sundown) and you will heal." Specifically avoid having ECG as the sun is setting. THat includes any meat eaten MUST be at breakfast or lunch since it takes 6 hrs to digest and create ECG. TO your health.

Expand full comment

No fucking way!

In the mid 1990's I had an oncology nuse friend. Part of her job was to put a canular in and hook patients up to chemo. She didn't talk in detail about this and it was way before I knew what was going on. Anyway, I didn't hear from her for a few months and then I had a traumatic call. She had had pneumonia and they had found cancer on her lung. She told me through tears she would never have chemo because all her patients died some of them died within hours of the chemo some would last a few weeks, but they all died. She died in December of 96 of a heart attack in an ambulance due to the weight loss from the cancer, she was 27 and had refused all treatment.

Expand full comment

Did you speculate like I just did that chemo vapors got to her or some such parallel introduction to her system? Yikes on top of yikes

Expand full comment

She told me that it was contraception that caused the cancer, but I take your point and it was something that I thought about.

Expand full comment
Nov 20·edited Nov 20

Not a chance. How many people 'beat cancer' on chemo, and then end up getting it again. I think the toxicity of chemo sets a person up for the next 'bounce back' of the cancer. This longer-term toxicity is a problem with PrEP too. But I wouldn't put it past the myopic behavior of the medical establishment with this 'anything to stop something' mentality.

Expand full comment

Isn’t that what vaccines are?

Expand full comment

I wouldn’t take any poison, knowingly, for any reason at any time. So, no.

Expand full comment

The answer is HELL NO!

Expand full comment

I presume that all preventative medicines will give you what you're trying to avoid, so No, I wouldn't take it.

Expand full comment

I never would. But I think that at the rate that toxic medications are being normalized in this pharmocratic culture, particularly within the need to "fight cancer," I could see that some people would. And isn't PrEP just an extreme version of a "vaccine"? If you're going to inject yourself with 70 toxic substances "just in case" and "to be healthy" (because health comes from pharma, as well know!), then why not take PrEP.

Expand full comment

Hell No

Expand full comment

The general idea is that the state of HIV+ is contagious like 'a virus', as opposed to cancers.

Expand full comment

Simple question: Does this unnatural chemical cocktail serve humanity?

Simple response: No

Expand full comment

If I was HIV-, I would not.

Expand full comment