13 Comments
User's avatar
Matt Irwin MD's avatar

Miguel has done the detailed work that most do not have patience or time for. I’m confident that if one were to dive into this, they would find these sequences in a lot of other places. After all, being present in the fossil of a Neanderthal really puts the icing on the cake! Here is the quote about neanderthal HIV sequences from his article.

“In 2010 Professor Svante Pääbo sequenced the genome of a 38,000-year-old fossil Homo sapiens neanderthalens. Pääbo was fastidious in avoiding contamination between Homo sapiens and Neanderthal DNA. In 2022 a BLASTN search revealed DNA homologous to the DNA of HIV-1 proteins p10, p51 and p66. TBLASTN, a sensitive bioinformatic tool for searching similarities at the protein level, returned amino acid sequences with high identity to the p7, p24, p41, p51, p66 and p160 HIV-1 proteins.”

😇

Expand full comment
Rebecca Culshaw Smith's avatar

It’s crazy isn’t it? Thanks so much Miguel for your insights.

Expand full comment
Miguel's avatar

Thank you Rebecca for your interest and publish my work! :-)

Expand full comment
Jamie Andrews's avatar

Hi Miguel, Fantastic work. I see you have had previous contact with the Perrh Group, or at least they are aware of your work.

I have sent you a DM but incase you don't read them. I am conducting genetics controls and have recieved similar finds to yourself. I would be interested in speaking to you about your work in more detail amd introducing you to the project I am running. Cheers Jamie

Expand full comment
Pablum in Silico's avatar

Can you provide a credible transmission study?

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Isn't this what Peter Duesberg was contending all along back in the 1980s? That "HIV" was a harmless sequence found in everyone if it was looked for? I read all of Celia Farber's articles in SPIN at the time. Still read her today. I don't even know why this topic interested me at the time, but in retrospect (beyond youthful paranoia), it fits with my inherently skeptical personality, and my doubt of most things served up to me by elite power players.

Expand full comment
Rebecca Culshaw Smith's avatar

I think Duesberg said retroviral sequences were in the human genome, but I don’t think he specifically said “HIV” sequences specifically.

Expand full comment
LR's avatar

I wish someone like Miguel or RFK jr. would take a look at the HIAP-II retrovirus which is considered ICL or non-hiv AIDs and has some sequences of HIV. Per the HIAP-II patent linked below, it states:

"It is based, at least in part, on the discovery of a novel retrovirus, HIAP-II, which is antigenically similar to HIAP-I, and which has a protein, p97, that appears to contain an epitope that is cross-reactive with HIAP-I, and in some cases with an HIV protein."

Here is the link to the official patent for this disease:

https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1995031531A1/en

It is outrageous to me that no one seems to know what this virus is, not even the ME/CFS doctors. I've sent them emails, etc. but none of them are interested, even though the researcher that discovered this virus is still employed at Tulane University (professor Robert Garry). Are these researchers really intent on finding the cause of ME/CFS, which may actually be the true cause of AIDs.

Expand full comment
Holly McC's avatar

Thank you for sharing!

Expand full comment
Christoph.'s avatar

Yep I think aligns with the body expressing this genetic material as part of a disease process. This is what gallo found and misidentified as viral. He was the hammer that saw his nail instead of what it actually was.

Expand full comment
David Lamson's avatar

First, though the ~3 billion base pair (bp) human genome was supposedly completed over 20yrs ago, there have been several major updates since, including 200-300 million new bp since 2020. In other words, the human genome has yet to be fully sequenced.

Second, the species origin of what have called HIV sequences has not been determined. The claimed HIV sequences themselves were derived from multiple organism genome mixtures, so it's possible that HIV sequences (or some of the HIV sequences) were actually human in origin.

But, we'll never know for sure until the HIV virus is discovered, isolated, and sequenced. Perhaps a mathematics analogy would be if someone claimed they had solved a mathematical proof yet never showed their work.

Expand full comment
Matthew's avatar

So it is just a part of the human genome I've suspected this for a while.

Expand full comment
R!CKYRANTS's avatar

"HIV" has never been proven to mean anything of significance. Is that what Miguel is trying to show?

Expand full comment