5 Comments

Discovered your posts via Mark Crispen Miller's post today:

How Team Fauci FORGED the "HIV/AIDS" theory, and "our free press" helped force it on the world (foretelling "COVID")

As someone who managed to avoid HIV/AIDS in its initial arrival I've been puzzled to meet an HIV+ diagnosis in 2013 (age 59.) Now 10years later and much wiser no mainstream info is believed. My life credo of questioning everything is proving useful.

HIV's personal arrival in 2013 is a puzzle. This quote in your current post "The inflammation might be caused as much by the patient’s emotional and psychiatric burden as the virus’s pathological course." ... is the most accurate statement I've read.

As a person wired for truth and also affected by HIV personally (lost friends in the '80's and '90's to AIDS) ... unravelling the physical presence of HIV (30lb weight loss, muscle loss, years of agonising stomach issues) wading through fiction and fact is a more than strange endeavour. Its surreal.

Wading through fiction and fact, includes a paragraph in Celia's article:

"Stewart doesn't buy the hype also that AIDS is caused by HIV alone: "It's an unpopular view, but I've always said that AIDS is a behavioural disease. It is multifactorial, brought on by several simultaneous strains on the immune system - drugs, pharmaceutical and recreational, sexually transmitted diseases, multiple viral infections.""

Friends who died of "AIDS" and in my own case of HIV, none of the above information is true.

- drugs pharmaceutical and recreational - definitely NO

- sexually transmitted diseases - NO

- multiple viral infections - NO

.... having faced prejudice in support agencies and in Health practitioners sourced in Stewarts assertion and adopted by Doctors and Specialists included is a continual source of dismay. I've been routinely disbelieved when answering NO.

Misinformation abounds, even in supposed truth-telling.

I appreciate reading this statement in your post today - it rings truest of all statements in the HIV/AIDS narrative:

"The inflammation might be caused as much by the patient’s emotional and psychiatric burden as the virus’s pathological course."

A possible reason its not taken seriously is the simple fact most of the narrative is driven by those of heterosexual persuasion. The prejudice and angst of being an outsider vilified for centuries is beyond credulity. Personally speaking, my diagnosis showed up in an extended period of a lifetime of unimagined stress. Sufficient to write a memoir as a way of understanding it.

Simply, thanks for this one quote.

Expand full comment

Stress certainly does take a toll. There are so many environmental toxins these days in our environment and food too. Take good care and I wish you well. 💕

Expand full comment

Thanks for this post. I'm just waking up to this whole HIV/AIDS thing the past couple years. I was in grad school in the '90s, with mostly lesbian partners, and I never questioned this. I didn't read up on it like I have during this covid era, even though my dad is HIV positive and his beloved partner and wonderful father figure to my stepsons died of AIDS (now I'd say supposedly died of aids, as it's obviously multi-factorial). My dad has sero converted and is now HIV negative, but still takes medication.

I think the covid era woke more people up because we were all affected with lockdowns and then this transfection vaccine injection.

Expand full comment

"nearly impossible to transmit sexually, but I can bet my last cent/dollar 99% of all HIV cases are through sexual intercourse

Expand full comment

I guess it's hard to tell because untreated individuals when they need help for any other conditions they will be forced to take Arvs

Expand full comment