I'd be curious to know how this percentage compares to that of people with HIV discontinuing ARVs (the infamous "lost to care"). Side effects tend to be swept under the rug by the medical community on the basis that experiencing side effects, no matter how bad they are, is still better than dying from HIV (or getting HIV, as far as PrEP is concerned). TAF is one hell of a drug to deal with, and it can make you feel infinitely more crap in many ways - extreme tiredness, joint pains, depression and suicidal ideation being just a few "treats" that come with it. It's hard to see the added value of taking it once the fear factor is removed.
As to why there's no vaccine, I have always wondered how they would be able to differentiate the good antibodies to HIV (induced by that elusive vaccine) from the bad antibodies (caused by the infection). I doubt an Elisa test would be able to pick that. Plus, they'll have to find a good explanation to get away with the conflicting narrative of 'You have HIV antibodies, it's good, you're protected' vs. ' You have HIV antibodies, it's bad, you're infected.'
One thing that has really helped me since the massive assault on objective reality by the media / 'science' / gov began in 2020 is to immediately translate the obscene BS they spew into the actual truth. For example, with this headline, I translate as I'm reading it to: "High number of people taking the incredibly toxic chemo-poison 'prep' that 'prevents' the fake-virus 'HIV' stop taking it (I wonder why?? Maybe they're not suicidally stupid?)" Same goes for Pharma commercials when for some reason I can't either hit 'mute' or change the channel. I mean... it's better than throwing something at the screen, right?
About the 'HIV' vaccine question, I submitted my best guess in one of your previous posts but here it is again:
"This is a really interesting observation that I wonder about too... Why has there been no HIV vaccine ('normal' or mRNA)? They make vaccines for every disease, or virus, or whatever, but not 'HIV.' All the 'safety testing' for vaccines is obscenely rigged (using other toxic vaccines as a 'placebo' etc). So it can't be that the HIV vaccines were 'unsafe' because all the other ones are also unsafe (and they obviously don't care about safety when AZT etc are also obviously unsafe). And by definition most vaccines are completely useless if the 'virus' doesn't even exist. And also they are useless in fact as well, as they have done nothing to prevent any disease. So lack of effectiveness never stopped them before either.
So what is different about HIV and why didn't they make a vaccine for it?
It seems to me that HIV for whatever reason is treated more like cancer, with super-toxic 'treatments' that cost a lot and are extended duration (rather than occasional, relatively cheap vaccines). It's probably a more profitable model, and I recently saw a vaccine for Anthrax described as 'PReP' so I suspect Pharma is moving to a more 'subscription-based' model for these things (and needless to say, the halo over the word 'vaccine' has become a bit sullied lately). They can make more money getting everyone constantly taking expensive poisons rather than occasional vaccines."
Edit: I forgot to mention-- 'covid' 'reality' has far outstripped hyperbole-- there are 300,000+ 'variants' of 'sars-cov-2' (of course all computer models, none found in real life) so your hyperbole was actually tame in comparison to the 'reality.'
However... I can rebut my own argument by pointing to the massively profitable vaccine-side-effect-treatment market. Vaccines (all of them) cause common, awful intractable side effects like Psoriasis, Eczema, IBS, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and many many other conditions that make life permanently miserable (they also cause more acute injuries like death, paralysis, and Autism which are certainly more 'serious'). And these are really difficult to do anything about (as type this I'm looking at the worst eczema flareup I've had in decades, which I've had problems with ever since I got a bunch of vaccines in the military. This is despite eating if possible only organic food, avoiding chemicals, avoiding all Pharma poisons, avoiding RF/EMF, staying fit, working out, etc I still constantly struggle with this awful disgusting problem).
But if you notice on TV commercials, practically all of the Pharma commercials are for exactly those vaccine side-effect diseases....... And I know from personal experience how much you want to get 'cured' so I can understand how people might take the chance with a super-toxic drug to get 'relief.' The side effects on these drugs are insane... probably not much different than other chemo poisons like AZT, actually (death, liver failure, cancer, complete destruction of immune system (which by the way is AIDS, isn't it??)).
So really you could say the 'vaccine side effect treatment industry' is quite the same thing as the 'HIV prevention / treatment industry.' Both involve incredibly toxic drugs. However you look at it Pharma is making a killing on super toxic drugs and vaccines and drugs to 'treat' the vaccine injuries etc. Quite a spectacular 'business success story' if you think about it.
Bill Gates told everyone that there would be 10-20% mild side effects, 7.7% went on to be hospitalized within two weeks (VSAFE), 6.6% have Long Covid/Long VaXXX and conservatively 1/150 "Died Suddenly".
So for those in the know what t'is all about, F.E.A.R. INC. you need control mechanisms on the farm right? If the peoples on the farm happily take their vaca, cow, cines, movies, then they might be happy and have some more children due to not being fear ridden, existentially worried out of their minds if they're going to live to see them grow up, etc,etc, the white coats under lords love control over ya, just a hunge about the levers being used on the farm, the game is fear and scarcity, they create shite load of cash cows especially if you're into insider trading knowledge, but the answer is maybe that they tell you that you have aids when you have anti-bodies, so if they then tell you that you need to take in inject to create anti-bodies well then.................................WHO knows hey? .Go figure, logic takes ya a long way home, kind regards.
I wonder if guys are experiencing side effects enough that it's causing the discontinuation. One of the narratives of PrEP is that people may experience some mild short term side effects that they adjust to over the course of a few weeks or maybe a month, and then they're supposed to go away. Maybe more people are experiencing them beyond that declared window period and it makes them nervous.
If it's a financial thing, PrEP is basically covered by insurance plans at this point, which mitigates its actual cost to the user so I don't know how housing insecurity could be at play here.
What I think is a big factor is that guys, especially the younger generation being targeted for its use see 'HIV/AIDS' as an abstraction because it's essentially not happening right now. Meaning, unlike mid-80s, these guys aren't seeing their friends die, so not taking PrEP is effectively the same as taking it, if you know what I mean. The honest truth is that a lot of guys are having 'unsafe' sex these days and the sky hasn't been falling down.
I'd be curious to know how this percentage compares to that of people with HIV discontinuing ARVs (the infamous "lost to care"). Side effects tend to be swept under the rug by the medical community on the basis that experiencing side effects, no matter how bad they are, is still better than dying from HIV (or getting HIV, as far as PrEP is concerned). TAF is one hell of a drug to deal with, and it can make you feel infinitely more crap in many ways - extreme tiredness, joint pains, depression and suicidal ideation being just a few "treats" that come with it. It's hard to see the added value of taking it once the fear factor is removed.
As to why there's no vaccine, I have always wondered how they would be able to differentiate the good antibodies to HIV (induced by that elusive vaccine) from the bad antibodies (caused by the infection). I doubt an Elisa test would be able to pick that. Plus, they'll have to find a good explanation to get away with the conflicting narrative of 'You have HIV antibodies, it's good, you're protected' vs. ' You have HIV antibodies, it's bad, you're infected.'
One thing that has really helped me since the massive assault on objective reality by the media / 'science' / gov began in 2020 is to immediately translate the obscene BS they spew into the actual truth. For example, with this headline, I translate as I'm reading it to: "High number of people taking the incredibly toxic chemo-poison 'prep' that 'prevents' the fake-virus 'HIV' stop taking it (I wonder why?? Maybe they're not suicidally stupid?)" Same goes for Pharma commercials when for some reason I can't either hit 'mute' or change the channel. I mean... it's better than throwing something at the screen, right?
About the 'HIV' vaccine question, I submitted my best guess in one of your previous posts but here it is again:
"This is a really interesting observation that I wonder about too... Why has there been no HIV vaccine ('normal' or mRNA)? They make vaccines for every disease, or virus, or whatever, but not 'HIV.' All the 'safety testing' for vaccines is obscenely rigged (using other toxic vaccines as a 'placebo' etc). So it can't be that the HIV vaccines were 'unsafe' because all the other ones are also unsafe (and they obviously don't care about safety when AZT etc are also obviously unsafe). And by definition most vaccines are completely useless if the 'virus' doesn't even exist. And also they are useless in fact as well, as they have done nothing to prevent any disease. So lack of effectiveness never stopped them before either.
So what is different about HIV and why didn't they make a vaccine for it?
It seems to me that HIV for whatever reason is treated more like cancer, with super-toxic 'treatments' that cost a lot and are extended duration (rather than occasional, relatively cheap vaccines). It's probably a more profitable model, and I recently saw a vaccine for Anthrax described as 'PReP' so I suspect Pharma is moving to a more 'subscription-based' model for these things (and needless to say, the halo over the word 'vaccine' has become a bit sullied lately). They can make more money getting everyone constantly taking expensive poisons rather than occasional vaccines."
Edit: I forgot to mention-- 'covid' 'reality' has far outstripped hyperbole-- there are 300,000+ 'variants' of 'sars-cov-2' (of course all computer models, none found in real life) so your hyperbole was actually tame in comparison to the 'reality.'
Their modeling software created 5 Million variants of Covid and the CDC reports they've identified 1.67M variants.
However... I can rebut my own argument by pointing to the massively profitable vaccine-side-effect-treatment market. Vaccines (all of them) cause common, awful intractable side effects like Psoriasis, Eczema, IBS, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and many many other conditions that make life permanently miserable (they also cause more acute injuries like death, paralysis, and Autism which are certainly more 'serious'). And these are really difficult to do anything about (as type this I'm looking at the worst eczema flareup I've had in decades, which I've had problems with ever since I got a bunch of vaccines in the military. This is despite eating if possible only organic food, avoiding chemicals, avoiding all Pharma poisons, avoiding RF/EMF, staying fit, working out, etc I still constantly struggle with this awful disgusting problem).
But if you notice on TV commercials, practically all of the Pharma commercials are for exactly those vaccine side-effect diseases....... And I know from personal experience how much you want to get 'cured' so I can understand how people might take the chance with a super-toxic drug to get 'relief.' The side effects on these drugs are insane... probably not much different than other chemo poisons like AZT, actually (death, liver failure, cancer, complete destruction of immune system (which by the way is AIDS, isn't it??)).
So really you could say the 'vaccine side effect treatment industry' is quite the same thing as the 'HIV prevention / treatment industry.' Both involve incredibly toxic drugs. However you look at it Pharma is making a killing on super toxic drugs and vaccines and drugs to 'treat' the vaccine injuries etc. Quite a spectacular 'business success story' if you think about it.
Bill Gates told everyone that there would be 10-20% mild side effects, 7.7% went on to be hospitalized within two weeks (VSAFE), 6.6% have Long Covid/Long VaXXX and conservatively 1/150 "Died Suddenly".
Their modeling software created 5 Million variants of Covid and the CDC reports they've identified 1.67M variants.
So for those in the know what t'is all about, F.E.A.R. INC. you need control mechanisms on the farm right? If the peoples on the farm happily take their vaca, cow, cines, movies, then they might be happy and have some more children due to not being fear ridden, existentially worried out of their minds if they're going to live to see them grow up, etc,etc, the white coats under lords love control over ya, just a hunge about the levers being used on the farm, the game is fear and scarcity, they create shite load of cash cows especially if you're into insider trading knowledge, but the answer is maybe that they tell you that you have aids when you have anti-bodies, so if they then tell you that you need to take in inject to create anti-bodies well then.................................WHO knows hey? .Go figure, logic takes ya a long way home, kind regards.
I wonder if guys are experiencing side effects enough that it's causing the discontinuation. One of the narratives of PrEP is that people may experience some mild short term side effects that they adjust to over the course of a few weeks or maybe a month, and then they're supposed to go away. Maybe more people are experiencing them beyond that declared window period and it makes them nervous.
If it's a financial thing, PrEP is basically covered by insurance plans at this point, which mitigates its actual cost to the user so I don't know how housing insecurity could be at play here.
What I think is a big factor is that guys, especially the younger generation being targeted for its use see 'HIV/AIDS' as an abstraction because it's essentially not happening right now. Meaning, unlike mid-80s, these guys aren't seeing their friends die, so not taking PrEP is effectively the same as taking it, if you know what I mean. The honest truth is that a lot of guys are having 'unsafe' sex these days and the sky hasn't been falling down.