I saw something about this recently. Of course, after seeing the Bailey's videos deconstructing all the major STIs, including gonorrhea, it gives a person new perspective on this whole thing. You know, I've always wondered why we have this immune system that is said to fight off infections, except when it doesn't. Duesberg made this argument against HIV of course, that we see an immune response to it, and so it's dealt with. But we're crawling with bacteria, and we're exposed to bacteria all the time. Yet the ones we come in contact with during sex, well, that's bad. THOSE bacterial, well, shame on you, here take your antibiotic, even if you have no symptoms. Which of course most people don't. I had gonorrhea once, like all good gay men I was trained to go in for my regular HIV and STI checkup, and boom, it came back positive for gono. The nurse asked me if I had any of the regular symptoms, which of course I didn't.
But I can tell you guys will march out en masse and get it, even with a 40% efficacy rate, LOL.
There is an embedded video in this post from amidwesterndoctor@substack. The readers of this substack might also be interested in amidwesterndoctor. I had heard rumours about HIV coming from SIV. Usually, they are intermittent rumours that die out fairly quickly. Censorship?
Something tells me we’re starting from a different set of axioms. I believe that the gay community is being purposely targeted as guinea pigs for some very dangerous pharmaceutical treatments.
Of course targeting gay men is creepy. Gay men were targeted for use with AZT which killed a lot of them. There's good reason to be wary of the medical system pushing drugs on them which have dubious (at best) efficacy.
I saw something about this recently. Of course, after seeing the Bailey's videos deconstructing all the major STIs, including gonorrhea, it gives a person new perspective on this whole thing. You know, I've always wondered why we have this immune system that is said to fight off infections, except when it doesn't. Duesberg made this argument against HIV of course, that we see an immune response to it, and so it's dealt with. But we're crawling with bacteria, and we're exposed to bacteria all the time. Yet the ones we come in contact with during sex, well, that's bad. THOSE bacterial, well, shame on you, here take your antibiotic, even if you have no symptoms. Which of course most people don't. I had gonorrhea once, like all good gay men I was trained to go in for my regular HIV and STI checkup, and boom, it came back positive for gono. The nurse asked me if I had any of the regular symptoms, which of course I didn't.
But I can tell you guys will march out en masse and get it, even with a 40% efficacy rate, LOL.
My sister said she’d love to see reverse vaccine ads where they have to state the failure rate. “60-70% ineffective!” Brilliant.
There is an embedded video in this post from amidwesterndoctor@substack. The readers of this substack might also be interested in amidwesterndoctor. I had heard rumours about HIV coming from SIV. Usually, they are intermittent rumours that die out fairly quickly. Censorship?
A cruel joke.
Geez! That’s back on the menu⁉️
Something tells me we’re starting from a different set of axioms. I believe that the gay community is being purposely targeted as guinea pigs for some very dangerous pharmaceutical treatments.
Of course targeting gay men is creepy. Gay men were targeted for use with AZT which killed a lot of them. There's good reason to be wary of the medical system pushing drugs on them which have dubious (at best) efficacy.
Louder for the people in the back.