It’s been awhile since we have done an open thread here, so in the spirit of this (exhausting) election season, here is a question I’d love to hear your feedback on:
Let me share a Substack post I came across recently. The writer says, “You may not agree with ALL of issues supported or opposed to by both RFK Jr. and former President Donald Trump, but they may be the only team that can stop the insanity and murderous enclaves now ruling the world.”
I would say that hidden-hand controllers are guiding both "sides," and will use it for some dialectical diabolical outcome, no matter who "wins." And you can bet they get off on the chaos that ensues no matter what happens after the "election." The more of us who are harmed or killed, the happier they are. They feed off of our suffering.
The Democrats are hopelessly enmeshed with HIV/AIDS. All the skepticism of various medical things are coming from the conservative side of the isle. Democrats aren't inherently skeptical of anything science. If it's 'science', well', it's science, it's those crazy conservatives that are 'anti-science'. I actually have a kind of hard time with this because, having grown up a hyper conservative environment, it burned me pretty badly and so I can see why liberal-progressive-democrats find conservatives problematic. It was in fact the democrats and the liberal side of things that really helped me out of that wacky religious environment. BUT, this is a double-edges sword because the liberal democrats have this 'we believe in science' and it's a blindspot for them, that blindspot that allows them to have been bamboozled by HIV/AIDS. I find myself in this odd position of not really belonging to either camp, but also able to see the strengths and weaknesses of each. I do find myself siding more and more with conservatives, no doubt because of Covid. This also ties into the transgender thing, why democrats don't seem to be able to see the big dark side of this whole situation.
That's the best position, not belonging to either camp.
Trump's party is 1980s democratic party.
Liberals/progressives/revolutionaries are demonically possessed by mainstream media talking heads on tv and their phones. They are terrified of displeasing their favorite newscaster or pundit, as much as some religious people are terrified of being criticized by a priest or a pastor. It's the same toxic religious reflex. Anything that sounds sciency and submissive conjures the danger of being excommunicated by the devils who run the world.
It has nothing to do with which puppet gets selected for the theatrical job. It’s like asking, is the movie Philadelphia better, or the movie And the Band Played On, to dismantle the HIVAIDS theory they are both propagandistic garbage. By now, I am pretty convinced that RFKJr is an insider as well. In his wonderful theatrical endorsement speech, he didn’t mention COVID and the transfections once. Cynical me thinks that his critique of vaccines and the childhood schedule and the toxic adjuvants is going to be used to transition all childhood vaccines to the “safer” mRNA platform without adjuvants. He said many times that he is not anti vax. You better believe him.
Research Med Beds. It will cure HIV and destroy Big Pharma's poisoning. Trump and RFK Jr will cure everyone. The future is so bright. Have faith. God wins!!
Harris is a better choice, because gigantic frauds survive over time if and only if they yield profits much greater that their costs. Harris is very likely to destroy the economy further with a huge war somewhere. When that happens, many frauds will wither away. Pirates move fast on to the next enterprise.
But Trump may not crash the economy right away. And if there is a war he may manage to force allies to spend themselves to death buying weapons and ammo from the US, which may further prop up the decaying empire. Thus, and paradoxically, the HIV fraud would go on, as profits would still be succulent and secure. Why change your line of business in such conditions?
What on earth are you talking about? Trump's alliance with RFK Jr would at last bring in an openly HIV-skeptic health expert into the presidential inner circle. Whether Trump listens is another matter.
As far as I know, Trump has no ties to HIV AIDS organizations so he might actually be receptive just on the basis of wanting to do the thing that would most annoy the organizations like NIH, which he has openly scoffed.
Businessmen gonna businessmen. Sorry to burst your bubble. But take my comments more as sanguine conjectures than phlegmatic hypotheses. After all, I'm not talking about what they would do, but about what the world would make them do.
It's not an election.
I wish I didn’t agree with this comment, yet.
I know. It's simply a device to whip everyone up, with "them" hoping we harm each other as much as possible due to the outcome.
Let me share a Substack post I came across recently. The writer says, “You may not agree with ALL of issues supported or opposed to by both RFK Jr. and former President Donald Trump, but they may be the only team that can stop the insanity and murderous enclaves now ruling the world.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevestars/p/great-news-will-the-alliance-between?r=m7m0r&utm_medium=ios
I would say that hidden-hand controllers are guiding both "sides," and will use it for some dialectical diabolical outcome, no matter who "wins." And you can bet they get off on the chaos that ensues no matter what happens after the "election." The more of us who are harmed or killed, the happier they are. They feed off of our suffering.
It has crossed my mind many times that they are two arms of the same beast.
Celia Farber is saying “These are the worst people in the world.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/celiafarber/p/they-actually-are-installing-kamala?r=m7m0r&utm_medium=ios
The Democrats are hopelessly enmeshed with HIV/AIDS. All the skepticism of various medical things are coming from the conservative side of the isle. Democrats aren't inherently skeptical of anything science. If it's 'science', well', it's science, it's those crazy conservatives that are 'anti-science'. I actually have a kind of hard time with this because, having grown up a hyper conservative environment, it burned me pretty badly and so I can see why liberal-progressive-democrats find conservatives problematic. It was in fact the democrats and the liberal side of things that really helped me out of that wacky religious environment. BUT, this is a double-edges sword because the liberal democrats have this 'we believe in science' and it's a blindspot for them, that blindspot that allows them to have been bamboozled by HIV/AIDS. I find myself in this odd position of not really belonging to either camp, but also able to see the strengths and weaknesses of each. I do find myself siding more and more with conservatives, no doubt because of Covid. This also ties into the transgender thing, why democrats don't seem to be able to see the big dark side of this whole situation.
That's the best position, not belonging to either camp.
Trump's party is 1980s democratic party.
Liberals/progressives/revolutionaries are demonically possessed by mainstream media talking heads on tv and their phones. They are terrified of displeasing their favorite newscaster or pundit, as much as some religious people are terrified of being criticized by a priest or a pastor. It's the same toxic religious reflex. Anything that sounds sciency and submissive conjures the danger of being excommunicated by the devils who run the world.
You’re absolutely right about Trump’s party. 100%.
If you remember back to the nineties, it’s the DEMOCRATS that were anti vax.
The turnabout is weird. As I survey people I know who are on the liberal side, taking the covid vax was a definite thing to do, unquestioningly.
Simple.
demoRats lose.
RFKjr wins, hope Trump gives him free reign to generally improve the sorry state of death care, not health care. We shall see.
ScKamala put me in jail when I ran for mayor of SF killafornia in 2007,and shut down my Grasshopper taxicab business forevermore.
Wandewasson mkBeeb, who sold me the first ramp van. Claimed to me to have found a cure for aids with sundry drugs..,
I ran against Gruesome Gavin Gruesome Newsom in 2007 and ScKamala shut down my business.
Solitary isolation is bad for your health and well being.
demoRats want depopulation and devastation for all...sic
It has nothing to do with which puppet gets selected for the theatrical job. It’s like asking, is the movie Philadelphia better, or the movie And the Band Played On, to dismantle the HIVAIDS theory they are both propagandistic garbage. By now, I am pretty convinced that RFKJr is an insider as well. In his wonderful theatrical endorsement speech, he didn’t mention COVID and the transfections once. Cynical me thinks that his critique of vaccines and the childhood schedule and the toxic adjuvants is going to be used to transition all childhood vaccines to the “safer” mRNA platform without adjuvants. He said many times that he is not anti vax. You better believe him.
Informative
November 14th 2023 Trump pushes HIV is AIDS Hoax (in order push for mandatory (fake) tests for government workers), just like they are doing in Texas ft Fauci's AZT Telomere Terminator https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/trump-pushes-hiv-is-aids-hoax-ft-faucis-azt-telomere-terminator
🤯
I don't know if you've seen this yet, but RFK. Jr's VP pick did this ad. It's brilliant. It uses a pharmaceutical ad format. It's awesome. https://twitter.com/NicoleShanahan/status/1829291690277966165
The Election Ritual: the illusion of American democracyhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zhMB-hAczVY
Research Med Beds. It will cure HIV and destroy Big Pharma's poisoning. Trump and RFK Jr will cure everyone. The future is so bright. Have faith. God wins!!
Harris is a better choice, because gigantic frauds survive over time if and only if they yield profits much greater that their costs. Harris is very likely to destroy the economy further with a huge war somewhere. When that happens, many frauds will wither away. Pirates move fast on to the next enterprise.
But Trump may not crash the economy right away. And if there is a war he may manage to force allies to spend themselves to death buying weapons and ammo from the US, which may further prop up the decaying empire. Thus, and paradoxically, the HIV fraud would go on, as profits would still be succulent and secure. Why change your line of business in such conditions?
What on earth are you talking about? Trump's alliance with RFK Jr would at last bring in an openly HIV-skeptic health expert into the presidential inner circle. Whether Trump listens is another matter.
As far as I know, Trump has no ties to HIV AIDS organizations so he might actually be receptive just on the basis of wanting to do the thing that would most annoy the organizations like NIH, which he has openly scoffed.
Businessmen gonna businessmen. Sorry to burst your bubble. But take my comments more as sanguine conjectures than phlegmatic hypotheses. After all, I'm not talking about what they would do, but about what the world would make them do.