I agree 100% Rebecca. My husband and I have undiagnosed immune deficiency and chronic fatigue. I know exactly when I was infected with some infectious agent (10 years ago) and I then transferred this to my husband. Our systems are pretty much identical. The Infectious Disease doctors are NOT interested in our case at all and neither are the Mayo and Cleveland clinics. It is so shocking and disheartening. Last week they removed a tumor from my Thymus and so I'm trying to see if any university can test it for viruses, as several viruses are said to attack the Thymus and cause Myasthenia Gravis / Thymoma. I'm praying that someone will take interest. You're absolutely right in that the real cause of AIDs desperately needs to be researched and no one seems to want to touch it.
I caught this “agent” about a year ago via heterosexual act. I ended up searching left and right. I didn’t know what have I had caught. HIV was negative. But the symptoms were of aids like symptoms. I got scared and monitor symptoms noticed I had passed this to my family. It sounds crazy that there’s a lot of young people left and right that are catching this. I think covid messed our immune systems and that’s why I was able to catch this so easily. Now there’s hundreds of people in a group I’m in, they been infected for years. I speak with some Chinese people and it’s seems this bug has been circulating for years in China. A lot of Chinese people caught it via a sexual act with a prostitute or someone else that wasn’t their partners. Now the Chinese spread this to their families especially how they eat together and shared foods in big plates/bowls. They been trying to look for help and the big CeeCeePee is suppressing it. Now unfortunately this thing is passed like it was a cold. Not need for sexual to pass it family members and friends.
Thanks for taking this part of my comment on your other post, and addressing it. The whole edifice, the tissue of lies, needs to be fleshed out as fully as possible. Each person reading will be stirred in their own 'sense-make' (which is really only coming to terms with our limited, but 'enough' understanding...so we can live more comfortably with our experiences, the story we create of our life eh)
I get you better saying this....
"Since the vast majority of the public is operating under the assumption that the paradigm is correct, it is important to sow these seeds of doubt from within the framework of the paradigm!"
It IS important.... and corresponds with my process of questioning of the covid paradigm... which i then applied to, and expanded my view of the HIV paradigm. A fundamental to start with is the silly trust in TESTS...the PCR, the Elisa, the roadblock [cant remember proper name! wet blot, damp blot? :-) ], any ANTIBODY TEST. ( i just received a letter from NHS here in UK telling me they are sending me a bowel test kit...why should i trust that even!).
Yes, the seeds of doubt need nutrition, to germinate and sprout... we are told the MARKERS of a TEST which we are told IDENTIFIES the concocted name of a dis-ease (which is nothing but a display of symptoms signifying disharmony of ourselves, with causation utterly unique to ourselves).
We love to run with illusion of certainty, so yeah, "I am covid positive", "I am HIV positive"....aah ..."THAT explains why I am ill"! But all red herring...you been duped.
Get wise, you HAVE to take responsibility for your health, and better that arduous task than remain being pitched from pillar to post by well-meaning but mostly 'as clueless' people 'advising' you on your way forward according to their beliefs in falsehoods and science built on imaginary building blocks cast as monuments at the heart of medical practice!
Me getting carried away a tad Rebecca.... but you know from my email to you how I am in the middle of all this debate, thick (burgeoning lightness in the density) and personal...and feeling the sense of mission to OUT the demons who hold sway in grasping and twisting our perceptions!
I think I am at the point now where I cant trust anything said about the concept of 'Virus'. I just think we best get off being too 'material' focused and consider more the communication we have between each other in the way of light photons, inexplicable energies like sound and resonance.
We are contagious to others! And our being will mirror out...even if ill one can ooze a spiritual vitality which will impact on another in refreshing way. If you are grasped negatively by illness (having no notion that you just might be detoxing or having a beneficial re-jig of system) then you will radiate that out eh...and some will be susceptible to take that vibe on board...and 'catch' it!
So, if we can cast off this spell of 'HIV' we can open up to explore what we encounter entering from outside through all our 5, and many more, senses .... try and glean better WHY we are actually below par.
And as for AIDS, well that is the nastiest of mental threat been created...like the Plague of olden days.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome...what a doom-laden invasive concept which can be manifest by some off-the -cuff Dr remark. Let us have the opinion that at ANY point in time we have a state of health on a vibrational spectrum....glowing and vibrant to discordant and ailing to on the way to ultimate demise.
So anywhere within the spectrum is less than pure and perfectly harmonious.....and COME ON PEOPLE , duh....is there not a massive overlap of symptoms of all the disease labels that are placed upon us???
The classic is but Mitochondria impairment....I dont know, but it would seem THAT prostration effect is at root of CFS, 'long covid', ME, when with malaria etc...
And what of flu sxs?....so many other illnesses are 'like' flu.
We just have to get off these labels, and realise we have our own expressions going on....and we gotta look at our lifestyles, our perceptions (again, the story we tell of ourselves...what we attach to as giving meaning), we gotta try and take charge as much as possible, whilst discerning to accept help from skilled others.
Again warmed up to the subject...after all, we are dealing with deep Existential stuff here!
But to get back to your article...I would say be careful to be inserting links to any of your past articles which cant quite go with the flow of the current one....like the one 'drugs don't work'. I do get that so-called ARV's are pivotal within the framework of the HIV paradigm.... but to talk about them as 'not working' is rather an oxymoron if the purpose of their existence, and purported mode of action, is again addressing a FICTION...a chemical concoction treating what?? It can only be a poison that the body can only suffer (if taking out placebo effect) , from taking.
Oh well Rebecca thanks for stimulating thoughts and offering place to air them!
Hello Rebecca. While I understand your strategy regarding virus existence, I am curious if you have thoroughly examined the arguments the "No Virus" questioners have presented. I am also puzzled why you cited the HHV-6A infection paper, when it did not follow the scientific method in the slightest sense, let alone provide enough details in the method and testing to show a proper control (i.e. how do you standardize RT-PCR). Lots of assumptions, very little actual science.
Hello. I have researched the HIV causes AIDS narrative for 3 years. Inspired by this research I have completed a thriller novel 'A Dive Into Darkness' and am now embarking on a non-fiction book entitled
'CascAIDS: The shocking true story of how a tiny elite of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic.'
The central idea / theme of 'CascAIDS' is that the origin, development, embedment and dogmatization of the ‘HIV causes AIDS’ narrative / orthodoxy contains all the hallmarks of an Availability Cascade. Indeed it is a classic of its type.
To summarize my position:
1) Gallo did not find a viable 'killer' retrovirus (See 'Science Fictions' by Crewdson
2) Montagnier admitted in 2002 in 'A History of HIV Discovery' that all he found was a double contaminant
'We tried (unsuccessfully)to grow the BRU isolate in different T cell lines. If we had tried the LAI isolate instead, we would have been able to grow the virus without any trouble.
In October 1983, we were finally able to grow the BRU isolate in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cell lines, although we discovered later that the LAI virus had contaminated our BRU culture. At least six laboratories received the LAI sample (under the name BRU) from our group and experienced the same contamination. We think that the LAI virus readily contaminated the BRU culture because it associates with a mycoplasma species, Mycoplasma pirum, usually present in T cell lines. This physical association makes a fraction of the LAl virus highly infectious, and, in fact, this fraction can be neutralized with antibodies against M. pirum. As mycoplasmas are common contaminants of cultured cells, an infectious pseudotype virus (LAI associated with M. pirum) may have caused several contaminations between 1983 and 1984 in different laboratories.' (Including Gallo in September, the CDC in Atlanta and Weiss in London in February 1984).
3) AIDS was very real, but not new. AIDS had been seen in transplant patients for at least a decade. What was new were the affected demographics. The most highly sexually active gay males and the most active IVDUs burnt out their immune systems and left themselves wide open to opportunistic infections.
My prime suspect for 'triggering' AIDS (as it was for the CDC in 1981) is cytomegalovirus. It was known in 1981 that it was closely associated with both PCP pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma, was found in 90%+ of sexually active gay males, caused a subversion of the T4/T8 cell ratio, and killed transplant patients for nearly two decades.
See RH Rubin's 1977 paper 'Infectious disease syndromes attributable to cytomegalovirus'
'Because of the ubiquity of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection among renal transplant patients, the correlation between CMV isolation and clinical events is often difficult. In this prospective study, clinical CMV disease was diagnosed in 26 of 68 patients (38%) that received transplants between 1974 and 1976 on the basis of viral isolation and/or >4-fold rise in complement-fixing antibody in patients with an unexplained febrile illness of >5 days' duration.
All CMV syndromes began 1 to 4 months post-transplant, persisting up to 23 weeks thereafter (mean duration of symptoms was 19 days). Although CMV was observed in some instances to cause only prolonged fever (10 patients) or hepatitis (4 patients), its most important effects were pneumonia (9 patients) and profound leukopenia (8 patients). Three patterns of pneumonia were observed: bilateral interstitial pneumonia (3 patients), unilateral focal consolidation (1 patient) (both attributable to CMV alone), and diffuse bilateral pneumonia attributable to CMV and superinfecting microorganisms (5 patients). These last patients had CMV-induced leukopenia of >1 week's duration at onset of superinfection, and all died. The 4 patients without leukopenia did not develop superinfection, and all survived. Two other renal transplant recipients died of infection during this period, both with CMV, leukopenia, and Listeria monocytogenes sepsis.
The major infectious disease importance of CMV appears to be its effects on the respiratory tract and systemic host defense in predisposing to fatal superinfection.'
There was no mystery about AIDS but as I describe in 'CascAIDS' a tiny elite of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities made it their business to make it a deadly mystery and faked the HIV pandemic, with the help of their useful idiots, the LGBT community who refuse to engage when I reach out to them with the truth.
As Kuran says in 'Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation'
'People often lack relevant knowledge, even with respect to matters of great importance to them, and even if their convictions are intensely held.'
Rather than the ill-defined "AIDS" maybe better to use 'CD4-lymphopenia' or 'peripheral CD4 depletion' or whatever expression that adequately addresses the presumptive etiology of AIDS.
I would like to suggest a book: Energy Medicine for Women: Aligning Your Body’s Energies to Boost Your Health and Vitality by Donna Eden with David Feinstein, Pn.D. ( Foreword by Christiane Northrup, M.D.: “This book is a Woderful introduction to Energy Medicine. It distills the Experiences of One of the Field’s most joyous & effective Pioneers into a Heartful, user-friendly, Enormously Practical Guide.”copyright 2008. Tarcher/Penguin Group USA.
Since we have been told for 40 years now that HIV causes AIDS, she is challenging, with their own words and data, that it can't in the way they say it does. She's not obligated to explain what does.
I would like to read your substack but its private .
As Etienne de Harven said, if you're going to critique the 'HIV causes AIDS' narrative you should have your own alternative up your sleeve.
It's all very well talking about PReP but really you need to go back to 1981 to see where the initial diagnostic errors are made, by many, but especially the CDC. Its akin to talking about WW1 and starting in November 1918.
Yes, this seems to be the essence of Rebecca's orientation...(Jon Rappoport will be applauding her application of logic!)....what they say just doesnt add up. Picked apart, all of it is full of holes and disconnect. We can try and explain what HIV IS, what AIDS IS, (engage in trying to fathom them out at least!) ....but first things first we have to reach a point of knowing most of what we have been told, and believed, is BUNKUM!
You also have to define what AIDS is, as different countries have different "symptoms." Germ "theory" is truly as vacuous and malleable as evolutionary "theory."
After almost 40 years, some dissidents are still afraid to say in public that they know, and that it is very well documented, that what was called HIV was never proven to exist or found in any person. And they do that only because "people will call us deniers or will think that we say that Aids do not exist, or that by saying that, they will not be able to win the war or the case, or go public, or have fans". This position of the harmless non-existing phantom was exactly the problem that blocked the work of the Perth Group, Lanka, and many others, and here we are again in 2023 with new dissidents who, for the same reason (not to be rejected), knowing (from the original papers and from the FOIAs) that there never was a SARSCOv234556, go only with the injections and medication problems, avoiding to wake up people.
Aids cannot be defined, and neither can COVID. They are the result of combining already known "illnesses" with a killer fraudulent test that does not test neither for specific antibodies nor for a complete sequence that represents a thing; also, the definition of aids has been changing in all these years since the announcement of the new fraud on TV but also depends on the country, just as the so-called "tests" results and interpretation depend on the country. So can any of them be named? AIDS exist ? COVID exist ? If AIDS or COVID exist as a unique "illnesses,", you will be forced to treat a person after a test that doesn't test.
Saying all that, I need to express that Rebecca has been fighting for the truth, to avoid killer drugs being implemented, and against the establishment since long, long ago, and that if I do not share some strategic view points, we really have to thank her for all her work done.
I completely agree. Getting the truth out is ultimately what matters, and sometimes it takes longer to shatter your own "beliefs" that have been held for decades.
I agree 100% Rebecca. My husband and I have undiagnosed immune deficiency and chronic fatigue. I know exactly when I was infected with some infectious agent (10 years ago) and I then transferred this to my husband. Our systems are pretty much identical. The Infectious Disease doctors are NOT interested in our case at all and neither are the Mayo and Cleveland clinics. It is so shocking and disheartening. Last week they removed a tumor from my Thymus and so I'm trying to see if any university can test it for viruses, as several viruses are said to attack the Thymus and cause Myasthenia Gravis / Thymoma. I'm praying that someone will take interest. You're absolutely right in that the real cause of AIDs desperately needs to be researched and no one seems to want to touch it.
I caught this “agent” about a year ago via heterosexual act. I ended up searching left and right. I didn’t know what have I had caught. HIV was negative. But the symptoms were of aids like symptoms. I got scared and monitor symptoms noticed I had passed this to my family. It sounds crazy that there’s a lot of young people left and right that are catching this. I think covid messed our immune systems and that’s why I was able to catch this so easily. Now there’s hundreds of people in a group I’m in, they been infected for years. I speak with some Chinese people and it’s seems this bug has been circulating for years in China. A lot of Chinese people caught it via a sexual act with a prostitute or someone else that wasn’t their partners. Now the Chinese spread this to their families especially how they eat together and shared foods in big plates/bowls. They been trying to look for help and the big CeeCeePee is suppressing it. Now unfortunately this thing is passed like it was a cold. Not need for sexual to pass it family members and friends.
I’m not trying to spread rumors but facts.
Hi Rebecca!
Thanks for taking this part of my comment on your other post, and addressing it. The whole edifice, the tissue of lies, needs to be fleshed out as fully as possible. Each person reading will be stirred in their own 'sense-make' (which is really only coming to terms with our limited, but 'enough' understanding...so we can live more comfortably with our experiences, the story we create of our life eh)
I get you better saying this....
"Since the vast majority of the public is operating under the assumption that the paradigm is correct, it is important to sow these seeds of doubt from within the framework of the paradigm!"
It IS important.... and corresponds with my process of questioning of the covid paradigm... which i then applied to, and expanded my view of the HIV paradigm. A fundamental to start with is the silly trust in TESTS...the PCR, the Elisa, the roadblock [cant remember proper name! wet blot, damp blot? :-) ], any ANTIBODY TEST. ( i just received a letter from NHS here in UK telling me they are sending me a bowel test kit...why should i trust that even!).
Yes, the seeds of doubt need nutrition, to germinate and sprout... we are told the MARKERS of a TEST which we are told IDENTIFIES the concocted name of a dis-ease (which is nothing but a display of symptoms signifying disharmony of ourselves, with causation utterly unique to ourselves).
We love to run with illusion of certainty, so yeah, "I am covid positive", "I am HIV positive"....aah ..."THAT explains why I am ill"! But all red herring...you been duped.
Get wise, you HAVE to take responsibility for your health, and better that arduous task than remain being pitched from pillar to post by well-meaning but mostly 'as clueless' people 'advising' you on your way forward according to their beliefs in falsehoods and science built on imaginary building blocks cast as monuments at the heart of medical practice!
Me getting carried away a tad Rebecca.... but you know from my email to you how I am in the middle of all this debate, thick (burgeoning lightness in the density) and personal...and feeling the sense of mission to OUT the demons who hold sway in grasping and twisting our perceptions!
I think I am at the point now where I cant trust anything said about the concept of 'Virus'. I just think we best get off being too 'material' focused and consider more the communication we have between each other in the way of light photons, inexplicable energies like sound and resonance.
We are contagious to others! And our being will mirror out...even if ill one can ooze a spiritual vitality which will impact on another in refreshing way. If you are grasped negatively by illness (having no notion that you just might be detoxing or having a beneficial re-jig of system) then you will radiate that out eh...and some will be susceptible to take that vibe on board...and 'catch' it!
So, if we can cast off this spell of 'HIV' we can open up to explore what we encounter entering from outside through all our 5, and many more, senses .... try and glean better WHY we are actually below par.
And as for AIDS, well that is the nastiest of mental threat been created...like the Plague of olden days.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome...what a doom-laden invasive concept which can be manifest by some off-the -cuff Dr remark. Let us have the opinion that at ANY point in time we have a state of health on a vibrational spectrum....glowing and vibrant to discordant and ailing to on the way to ultimate demise.
So anywhere within the spectrum is less than pure and perfectly harmonious.....and COME ON PEOPLE , duh....is there not a massive overlap of symptoms of all the disease labels that are placed upon us???
The classic is but Mitochondria impairment....I dont know, but it would seem THAT prostration effect is at root of CFS, 'long covid', ME, when with malaria etc...
And what of flu sxs?....so many other illnesses are 'like' flu.
We just have to get off these labels, and realise we have our own expressions going on....and we gotta look at our lifestyles, our perceptions (again, the story we tell of ourselves...what we attach to as giving meaning), we gotta try and take charge as much as possible, whilst discerning to accept help from skilled others.
Again warmed up to the subject...after all, we are dealing with deep Existential stuff here!
But to get back to your article...I would say be careful to be inserting links to any of your past articles which cant quite go with the flow of the current one....like the one 'drugs don't work'. I do get that so-called ARV's are pivotal within the framework of the HIV paradigm.... but to talk about them as 'not working' is rather an oxymoron if the purpose of their existence, and purported mode of action, is again addressing a FICTION...a chemical concoction treating what?? It can only be a poison that the body can only suffer (if taking out placebo effect) , from taking.
Oh well Rebecca thanks for stimulating thoughts and offering place to air them!
Cheers
Steve
Is the Western Blot the test you are referring to that used to be considered confirmatory for the Elisa antibody tests?
yes...
Hello Rebecca. While I understand your strategy regarding virus existence, I am curious if you have thoroughly examined the arguments the "No Virus" questioners have presented. I am also puzzled why you cited the HHV-6A infection paper, when it did not follow the scientific method in the slightest sense, let alone provide enough details in the method and testing to show a proper control (i.e. how do you standardize RT-PCR). Lots of assumptions, very little actual science.
Hello. I have researched the HIV causes AIDS narrative for 3 years. Inspired by this research I have completed a thriller novel 'A Dive Into Darkness' and am now embarking on a non-fiction book entitled
'CascAIDS: The shocking true story of how a tiny elite of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities faked the HIV pandemic.'
My Substack posts are here: https://cascades.substack.com/publish/posts
This is post one: https://cascades.substack.com/p/cascaids
The central idea / theme of 'CascAIDS' is that the origin, development, embedment and dogmatization of the ‘HIV causes AIDS’ narrative / orthodoxy contains all the hallmarks of an Availability Cascade. Indeed it is a classic of its type.
To summarize my position:
1) Gallo did not find a viable 'killer' retrovirus (See 'Science Fictions' by Crewdson
https://www.sciencefictions.net/
2) Montagnier admitted in 2002 in 'A History of HIV Discovery' that all he found was a double contaminant
'We tried (unsuccessfully)to grow the BRU isolate in different T cell lines. If we had tried the LAI isolate instead, we would have been able to grow the virus without any trouble.
In October 1983, we were finally able to grow the BRU isolate in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B cell lines, although we discovered later that the LAI virus had contaminated our BRU culture. At least six laboratories received the LAI sample (under the name BRU) from our group and experienced the same contamination. We think that the LAI virus readily contaminated the BRU culture because it associates with a mycoplasma species, Mycoplasma pirum, usually present in T cell lines. This physical association makes a fraction of the LAl virus highly infectious, and, in fact, this fraction can be neutralized with antibodies against M. pirum. As mycoplasmas are common contaminants of cultured cells, an infectious pseudotype virus (LAI associated with M. pirum) may have caused several contaminations between 1983 and 1984 in different laboratories.' (Including Gallo in September, the CDC in Atlanta and Weiss in London in February 1984).
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1079027
3) AIDS was very real, but not new. AIDS had been seen in transplant patients for at least a decade. What was new were the affected demographics. The most highly sexually active gay males and the most active IVDUs burnt out their immune systems and left themselves wide open to opportunistic infections.
My prime suspect for 'triggering' AIDS (as it was for the CDC in 1981) is cytomegalovirus. It was known in 1981 that it was closely associated with both PCP pneumonia and Kaposi's sarcoma, was found in 90%+ of sexually active gay males, caused a subversion of the T4/T8 cell ratio, and killed transplant patients for nearly two decades.
See RH Rubin's 1977 paper 'Infectious disease syndromes attributable to cytomegalovirus'
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/INFECTIOUS_DISEASE_SYNDROMES_ATTRIBUTABLE_TO.10%20(3).pdf
This is the abstract:
'Because of the ubiquity of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection among renal transplant patients, the correlation between CMV isolation and clinical events is often difficult. In this prospective study, clinical CMV disease was diagnosed in 26 of 68 patients (38%) that received transplants between 1974 and 1976 on the basis of viral isolation and/or >4-fold rise in complement-fixing antibody in patients with an unexplained febrile illness of >5 days' duration.
All CMV syndromes began 1 to 4 months post-transplant, persisting up to 23 weeks thereafter (mean duration of symptoms was 19 days). Although CMV was observed in some instances to cause only prolonged fever (10 patients) or hepatitis (4 patients), its most important effects were pneumonia (9 patients) and profound leukopenia (8 patients). Three patterns of pneumonia were observed: bilateral interstitial pneumonia (3 patients), unilateral focal consolidation (1 patient) (both attributable to CMV alone), and diffuse bilateral pneumonia attributable to CMV and superinfecting microorganisms (5 patients). These last patients had CMV-induced leukopenia of >1 week's duration at onset of superinfection, and all died. The 4 patients without leukopenia did not develop superinfection, and all survived. Two other renal transplant recipients died of infection during this period, both with CMV, leukopenia, and Listeria monocytogenes sepsis.
The major infectious disease importance of CMV appears to be its effects on the respiratory tract and systemic host defense in predisposing to fatal superinfection.'
There was no mystery about AIDS but as I describe in 'CascAIDS' a tiny elite of scientists, medics, public health officials, activists and celebrities made it their business to make it a deadly mystery and faked the HIV pandemic, with the help of their useful idiots, the LGBT community who refuse to engage when I reach out to them with the truth.
As Kuran says in 'Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation'
'People often lack relevant knowledge, even with respect to matters of great importance to them, and even if their convictions are intensely held.'
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=138144
Thank you Rebecca, this your article is now very clear to me.
Rather than the ill-defined "AIDS" maybe better to use 'CD4-lymphopenia' or 'peripheral CD4 depletion' or whatever expression that adequately addresses the presumptive etiology of AIDS.
Hi Rebecca,
This statement rings true considering that 'viral load' is not used for routine screening of individuals:
"This would also explain why positive “viral loads” have not infrequently been found in HIV antibody negative individuals."
In any case, can you maybe provide some citations? Would be very helpful - thanking you in advance!
Aloha Rebecca,
I would like to suggest a book: Energy Medicine for Women: Aligning Your Body’s Energies to Boost Your Health and Vitality by Donna Eden with David Feinstein, Pn.D. ( Foreword by Christiane Northrup, M.D.: “This book is a Woderful introduction to Energy Medicine. It distills the Experiences of One of the Field’s most joyous & effective Pioneers into a Heartful, user-friendly, Enormously Practical Guide.”copyright 2008. Tarcher/Penguin Group USA.
Well said! Thank you!!
I also think the HIV don't exist, have no explanation on what react positive
It's all very well saying what isn't a cause of AIDS, you need to explain what you think does.
See my Substack https://cascades.substack.com/publish/home for my explanation.
Since we have been told for 40 years now that HIV causes AIDS, she is challenging, with their own words and data, that it can't in the way they say it does. She's not obligated to explain what does.
I would like to read your substack but its private .
Hi.
My Substack isn't private.
This is the link to the home page.
https://cascades.substack.com/
If this does not work please let me know.
As Etienne de Harven said, if you're going to critique the 'HIV causes AIDS' narrative you should have your own alternative up your sleeve.
It's all very well talking about PReP but really you need to go back to 1981 to see where the initial diagnostic errors are made, by many, but especially the CDC. Its akin to talking about WW1 and starting in November 1918.
Regards,
Paul
Yes, this seems to be the essence of Rebecca's orientation...(Jon Rappoport will be applauding her application of logic!)....what they say just doesnt add up. Picked apart, all of it is full of holes and disconnect. We can try and explain what HIV IS, what AIDS IS, (engage in trying to fathom them out at least!) ....but first things first we have to reach a point of knowing most of what we have been told, and believed, is BUNKUM!
You also have to define what AIDS is, as different countries have different "symptoms." Germ "theory" is truly as vacuous and malleable as evolutionary "theory."
After almost 40 years, some dissidents are still afraid to say in public that they know, and that it is very well documented, that what was called HIV was never proven to exist or found in any person. And they do that only because "people will call us deniers or will think that we say that Aids do not exist, or that by saying that, they will not be able to win the war or the case, or go public, or have fans". This position of the harmless non-existing phantom was exactly the problem that blocked the work of the Perth Group, Lanka, and many others, and here we are again in 2023 with new dissidents who, for the same reason (not to be rejected), knowing (from the original papers and from the FOIAs) that there never was a SARSCOv234556, go only with the injections and medication problems, avoiding to wake up people.
Aids cannot be defined, and neither can COVID. They are the result of combining already known "illnesses" with a killer fraudulent test that does not test neither for specific antibodies nor for a complete sequence that represents a thing; also, the definition of aids has been changing in all these years since the announcement of the new fraud on TV but also depends on the country, just as the so-called "tests" results and interpretation depend on the country. So can any of them be named? AIDS exist ? COVID exist ? If AIDS or COVID exist as a unique "illnesses,", you will be forced to treat a person after a test that doesn't test.
Saying all that, I need to express that Rebecca has been fighting for the truth, to avoid killer drugs being implemented, and against the establishment since long, long ago, and that if I do not share some strategic view points, we really have to thank her for all her work done.
Misha from gamzuletova.org
I completely agree. Getting the truth out is ultimately what matters, and sometimes it takes longer to shatter your own "beliefs" that have been held for decades.