17 Comments

Hmm, and Gregg is equally nonsensical when it comes to "HIV", for which he was able to cite zero scientific evidence when I emailed him last month after reading your earlier article about him :)

Yale professor, MacArthur "genius" & "HIV" activist Gregg Gonsalves fails scientific evidence challenge

https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/yale-professor-macarthur-genius-and

Expand full comment

More of a Covid reactionary than NPR and the NY Times. That's pretty tough to accomplish and yet Gonsalves and The Nation do it with ease.

Wouldn't take much digging to find some Pharma/Gates grants under the skin of this menace.

Pompous know-nothing Ivy League windbag:

https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/yale-professor-macarthur-genius-and

Expand full comment

Can Greg answer these questions?

"Did New York City actually handle 20K "extra" bodies in a month? How?

What about Madrid and London? Where are the pics of 8K more people dying in a month?

How was this body management kept from public view?

Where are the testimonies about these events?"

https://twitter.com/Wood_House76/status/1784994829887308102

"I spoke with a veteran of an NYC department recently who was "on the ground"/in the field during those weeks. He said he saw nothing like the data show.

I daresay no one did."

Expand full comment

If it looks like bullshit, smells like bullshit, and comes out of the back end of a bull, it's probably BULLSHIT.

Expand full comment

"Let’s put it bluntly. Kids aren’t supposed to die, and yet they did."

Ok, that really made me laugh. How much more hyper-over-the-top-the-sky-is-falling-oh-my!-dramatic can he be? Especially when, like you mentioned, you consider the damage caused by the lockdowns. This is JUST like 'HIV' in that you can only believe in one end-point (stop 'transmission' at all costs), and any other unintended consequences caused by this quixotic quest aren't to be considered at all in the equation, or at best they're considered acceptable 'casualties of war' collateral damage (bone loss, etc. is not as bad as being 'positive'.)

Expand full comment

Well said. And not just lockdowns, but MASKING. It will save your life, of COURSE (sarcasm!), but you'll have organ and/or brain damage from the lack of OXYGEN!! And other troubles, like learning about facial expressions, hearing language, for the very young kids... What a hellish thing.

Expand full comment

A nice counter to the misguided belief in social isolation and solitary confinement as a “public health” strategy is Sweden which by at least one analysis had the lowest mortality of any country in Europe. This despite never closing schools for the vast majority of children, never closing businesses, and never adopting mask wearing.

I wrote up Sweden’s results in several newsletters and included links below. They would have had even better results if they had not used social isolation in the elderly in a misguided attempt to protect them by isolating them.

This is especially problematic in understaffed facilities, but it is equally unsafe in private homes when they live by themselves. A better plan is to have as many people around them as possible, including regular visits from family and friends. That’s what I’ll prefer in my golden years :-)

Link to Sweden results discussion in “The Spectator” in early 2023

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/sweden-covid-and-excess-deaths-a-look-at-the-data/

Recent newsletter after Martin Kulldorff’s firing from Harvard was made public.

https://drmattirwin.substack.com/p/dr-matt-newsletter-brief-update-harvard

Expand full comment

“‘Do Something!’ doesn’t always end well.”

One very minor criticism of an otherwise excellent piece: I would suggest that when “Do Something” is directed at the government it NEVER ends well.

Expand full comment

We need to DO SOMETHING about the fricken govt.

Expand full comment

"...That’s an interesting use of language; “Covid revisionists.”..."

Cultural Marxism. An overused term these days but this is a perfect example. The language is the ultimate tell. This is a worthwhile read if you want to avoid the Frankfurt School dive.

Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky

https://archive.org/details/RulesForRadicals

Expand full comment

Thank you. So many assumptions-government is good (public health,) Big Medicine is good (don't they "cure" all kinds of diseases?,) public schools are good. But, is the opposite more accurate?

Regarding the invisible burger, why insist the burger exists, yet refuse to remove the bun and prove the assertion? I can't say, but I'd not be surprised if much fame and income would be lost were they to do so.

But, aside from scientific deception, what great gains in health standards might result if the actual causes of disease were revealed? Did so-called communicable diseases nearly disappear by mid-20th century (prior to antibiotics and vaccines) because germs disappeared or because toxic living conditions disappeared?

Expand full comment

Florence Nightingale had it right. Fraud and scammer Louis Pasteur was the Bad Seed with all this vaccine nonsense. So saith the dog.

Expand full comment

All research in History must be revisionistic, by definition. This is an old argument made by many people before me.

Historians must review historical documents, written in any media. They have to verify the paper trail. Otherwise, there is no historical research.

Take the so called Holocaust. We have to revise it. The claim that there was a plan to mass murder certain groups of people has to be proved by evidence. Those who enter the field of History with the preconceived idea that the evidence does not exist will try to falsify it. What they do is not revisionism, but political activism in the same style as Gonsalves.

I deny falsities. In doing that, I assert truth. Those who deny truth, are better called propagandists or traitors. They want to justify crimes and destroy evidence, so that no review is possible. PR people and masters of persuasion are morally worse than the people who were ignorant supporters of Nazism.

Expand full comment

There are plenty of revised tellings of history.

Here's a great page for that: https://francesleader.substack.com/

Expand full comment

"Did anyone else notice the peculiar phenomenon during the early days of Covid of people that, beforehand, seemed to have never even thought of death as being something that happens to everyone eventually? That’s how powerful the narrative was; people that had never given much thought to their own mortality were suddenly hypnotized to believe that their death was imminent, when prior to Covid it had been simply theoretical. It was a very strange psychological phenomenon."

Yes! This also stood out to me.

Expand full comment

Hello, I found you through Christine Massey, which is as a good as a nod from god, in my world, lol. (No offense to anyone's deity intended, I just like the phrase I just made up!)

I do remember seeing that the death rate from 2020 was actually a bit LESS than usual, although not glaringly so. But the death rate from 2021 was MUCH higher. That right there should be a big-ass hint!

I said this on Christine's page and I'll say it again here, because it's about AIDS/HIV, not so much about a person, but in RFK Jr.'s book about Fauci, there is a TON of evidence in the story about this fake plague and how the lies and fear-mongering about it (curiously similar to "Covid") were done... Oh, they've been preparing us for decades for "pandemics" to sell their vaccines and now a biggo genocide. I'm with you, tho, I think people are beginning, and numbers seem to be growing daily, to see the lies behind all this plague nonsense and Germ Theory generally, although a lot of folks may not quite have enough of a handle on it to EXPLAIN IT-- it seems to be more an intuitive sense that things are Not Quite Right... Onward! I like your writing, good work.

Expand full comment