I missed this. Not surprising because I try very hard to avoid Rogan and Weinstein and a few others. Can't barely stand them.
It's interesting because this could be the start of the dam breaking, right?
Have the psychos in charge decided that now (election year) is a good time to let this dam go?
Rebecca, you also mentioned in that interview with Sam Bailey months ago that everyone who talks about the Kennedy book carefully avoids that solar-system sized Elephant in the room that is the work on HIV/AIDS by Celia Farber.
People are afraid to talk about this. The covid mass murder, mass-theft and power-grab operation is a direct consequence of the HIV debacle. And the fact that AIDS is an industry, a way of living for a lot of people. AIDS Inc. like the book of Jon Rappoport, a book from the time when internet near-instantaneous communication and mass citizen journalism was only a dream.
The internet has changed everything, a double-edged sword in the hands of the powerful.
Sorry, I think Shiva is astroturf. I have zero confidence on the MIT socialists. Call me bigoted if you must.
I wish Kennedy had listened to Jon when he advised to run only on the vaccine thing. A one-issue candidate. That opens the conversation to be had against all monopolies and all gangs.
Like the border issue.
How easy could it be to simply argue that the immigration issue is also a vaccine problem, because you cannot just assault the bodies of those poor people who run from their tyrannical countries and the gangs (message to the left) and it would be too expensive to treat the damage done with vaccines to foreigners (message to the right) and it is antisemitic to poison prisoners (message to the libertarians.)
The high-profile questioning of HIV = AIDS is welcome news, and thanks for mentioning how the opening chapters of RFK Jr’s Fauci book candidly discuss that fraud as a sort of “practice run” for the Covid scam
“AIDS denialism.” That says it all. It’s a cult, just like “COVID.” It is a kind of secular Apocalypticism with its own in/out groups and white robbed sanctimonious priests.
I view Bret Weinstein a twerp. I view AIDS/HIV made up codswallop. Put a dick in the anal canal, damage the canal wall and it will risk negative health.
Far more straight people practice anal sex than gay people do in absolute numbers. Whatever proto-AIDS was, it was more complex than just gay men having anal sex. Gay men were targeted by drugs like AZT and murdered by it, whereas straight people who practiced anal sex weren't.
I haven't suggested heterosexuals do not. How anyone knows the numbers, goodness knows. Do people answer surveys? I guess so.
Than anal canal is designed to expel waste, it's not a sex organ as E. Michael Jones so hilariously puts it. Stick things up it and risk harm. My favourite and must missed art critic Brian Sewell had more pricks up his backside than a second hand dart board. Each to their own. It's certainly not my cuppa tea.
I don't doubt the pharmaceutical products labelled 'medicine' were harmful; I haven't taken a pharmaceutical product in decades. They do harm well beyond so called AIDS.
I think that's a big part of it. I think Gallo simply found antibodies and altered proteins in the body that were indicating this kind of physiologic abuse. The Perth Group point to oxidized actin and myocin as culprits here.
Gay men were using a lot of recreational drugs during weekend long orgies, of special note were the amyl-nitrate poppers that damage the immune system. Being addicted to sex can cause other addicted behaviors like not eating right and getting proper sleep. There was also the rarely talked about experimental Hepatitis vaccine that was distributed in the free mens clinics in CA and the east coast at the same time. The Kaposi's Sarcoma epidemic wasn't noted until after those occured. Then track and trace so they could give perfectly healthy men the poisonous AZT, "while they were still asymptomatic".
the sacred cow of gay male sex must not be inhibited in its expression, nor investigated in its consequences. this is the tabu never to be broken -- this the subtext that empowered Fauci -- a billy club to batter the brains of any seeker of fact not in the death cult. Duesberg was right, and his commonsense analysis (pun incidental) remains news.
Luc Montagnier did not believe HIV to be causative of AIDS, correlation not being causation. There are just too many coincident features between AIDS and C-19, many beginning and ending with Anthony Fauci and the amount of money at his disposal, extremely toxic drugs and completely unwarranted profits for pharma. They grew used to their profits from HIV, and what better way to create a whole new gravy train for a whole new crop of buyable scientists, than with a whole new plague. Of course, a Venn diagram better explains all the overlapping interests of all the groups in on it. Not just the scientists and pharma, the military, the global tyrant wanna-bes, the ID sellers, big data, the new layers of bureaucracy.
In the early 1980's, one of my college classmates suddenly came out as gay after being aggressively groomed for more than a year by an upperclassman. He sadly lamented he'd soon die of AIDS. Totally convinced of that cause of death as if a subject of an evil mind control experiment. He ended up healthy until about 30 years dying of an aggressive brain tumor perhaps caused by his many years of work as an international lawyer with bluetooth cell phone transmitters in his ears.
In late 1970's while working in San Francisco I noticed an overnight rise in "gay bathhouses" for causal gay hookup sex at the very same time as what seemed to be a local mass media and local politicians' campaign normalizing that behavior after the 1978 assassination of the outspoken gay SF council member Harvey Milk which launched California US Senator Diane Feinstein's career. She, who had a driver for a very long time who was a spy for China. Now I wonder if the AIDs pump was being primed for profits by 1978. What came first? The chicken or the egg?
As always, critics offer no scientific evidence that HIV even exists much less is the cause of the range of symptoms claimed to be a disease known as AIDS.
Hopefully people really start to question the medical (as well as other) establishment/s to seek the truth. But as you say, it will be interesting to see how things unfold.
By July 1981, the CDC was looking for a pathogen that impacted upon T cells, had an association with KS, PCP pneumonia and Candidiasis, and was common in sexually active male homosexuals.
I missed this. Not surprising because I try very hard to avoid Rogan and Weinstein and a few others. Can't barely stand them.
It's interesting because this could be the start of the dam breaking, right?
Have the psychos in charge decided that now (election year) is a good time to let this dam go?
Rebecca, you also mentioned in that interview with Sam Bailey months ago that everyone who talks about the Kennedy book carefully avoids that solar-system sized Elephant in the room that is the work on HIV/AIDS by Celia Farber.
People are afraid to talk about this. The covid mass murder, mass-theft and power-grab operation is a direct consequence of the HIV debacle. And the fact that AIDS is an industry, a way of living for a lot of people. AIDS Inc. like the book of Jon Rappoport, a book from the time when internet near-instantaneous communication and mass citizen journalism was only a dream.
The internet has changed everything, a double-edged sword in the hands of the powerful.
Thanks for recognizing Jon Rappoport!
Another, Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, whom RFK jr. plagiarized unashamedly, should be recognized also.
Sorry, I think Shiva is astroturf. I have zero confidence on the MIT socialists. Call me bigoted if you must.
I wish Kennedy had listened to Jon when he advised to run only on the vaccine thing. A one-issue candidate. That opens the conversation to be had against all monopolies and all gangs.
Like the border issue.
How easy could it be to simply argue that the immigration issue is also a vaccine problem, because you cannot just assault the bodies of those poor people who run from their tyrannical countries and the gangs (message to the left) and it would be too expensive to treat the damage done with vaccines to foreigners (message to the right) and it is antisemitic to poison prisoners (message to the libertarians.)
It's 'dam'. As in, 'That damn dam has burst again, ma!'
Oh!
Thanks, your rait!
Sorry about that.
I will fix it now.
The high-profile questioning of HIV = AIDS is welcome news, and thanks for mentioning how the opening chapters of RFK Jr’s Fauci book candidly discuss that fraud as a sort of “practice run” for the Covid scam
“AIDS denialism.” That says it all. It’s a cult, just like “COVID.” It is a kind of secular Apocalypticism with its own in/out groups and white robbed sanctimonious priests.
Weinstein is the guy that said we should lock down harder for a virus never proven to exist. I think he is a tool for division and confusion.
I don’t know very much about him other than the two interviews I reacted to, I just report on what I see that I think is relevant.
Fauci is the top contender for conviction for democide.
I view Bret Weinstein a twerp. I view AIDS/HIV made up codswallop. Put a dick in the anal canal, damage the canal wall and it will risk negative health.
I am currently fascinated by JJ Couey....
‘I don’t know what I know anymore.’
https://nedpamphilon.substack.com/p/i-dont-know-what-i-know-anymore
Far more straight people practice anal sex than gay people do in absolute numbers. Whatever proto-AIDS was, it was more complex than just gay men having anal sex. Gay men were targeted by drugs like AZT and murdered by it, whereas straight people who practiced anal sex weren't.
A hundred percent correct.
I haven't suggested heterosexuals do not. How anyone knows the numbers, goodness knows. Do people answer surveys? I guess so.
Than anal canal is designed to expel waste, it's not a sex organ as E. Michael Jones so hilariously puts it. Stick things up it and risk harm. My favourite and must missed art critic Brian Sewell had more pricks up his backside than a second hand dart board. Each to their own. It's certainly not my cuppa tea.
I don't doubt the pharmaceutical products labelled 'medicine' were harmful; I haven't taken a pharmaceutical product in decades. They do harm well beyond so called AIDS.
Drugs
I think that's a big part of it. I think Gallo simply found antibodies and altered proteins in the body that were indicating this kind of physiologic abuse. The Perth Group point to oxidized actin and myocin as culprits here.
Simply found, or methodically “invented?”
Gay men were using a lot of recreational drugs during weekend long orgies, of special note were the amyl-nitrate poppers that damage the immune system. Being addicted to sex can cause other addicted behaviors like not eating right and getting proper sleep. There was also the rarely talked about experimental Hepatitis vaccine that was distributed in the free mens clinics in CA and the east coast at the same time. The Kaposi's Sarcoma epidemic wasn't noted until after those occured. Then track and trace so they could give perfectly healthy men the poisonous AZT, "while they were still asymptomatic".
the sacred cow of gay male sex must not be inhibited in its expression, nor investigated in its consequences. this is the tabu never to be broken -- this the subtext that empowered Fauci -- a billy club to batter the brains of any seeker of fact not in the death cult. Duesberg was right, and his commonsense analysis (pun incidental) remains news.
Luc Montagnier did not believe HIV to be causative of AIDS, correlation not being causation. There are just too many coincident features between AIDS and C-19, many beginning and ending with Anthony Fauci and the amount of money at his disposal, extremely toxic drugs and completely unwarranted profits for pharma. They grew used to their profits from HIV, and what better way to create a whole new gravy train for a whole new crop of buyable scientists, than with a whole new plague. Of course, a Venn diagram better explains all the overlapping interests of all the groups in on it. Not just the scientists and pharma, the military, the global tyrant wanna-bes, the ID sellers, big data, the new layers of bureaucracy.
In the early 1980's, one of my college classmates suddenly came out as gay after being aggressively groomed for more than a year by an upperclassman. He sadly lamented he'd soon die of AIDS. Totally convinced of that cause of death as if a subject of an evil mind control experiment. He ended up healthy until about 30 years dying of an aggressive brain tumor perhaps caused by his many years of work as an international lawyer with bluetooth cell phone transmitters in his ears.
In late 1970's while working in San Francisco I noticed an overnight rise in "gay bathhouses" for causal gay hookup sex at the very same time as what seemed to be a local mass media and local politicians' campaign normalizing that behavior after the 1978 assassination of the outspoken gay SF council member Harvey Milk which launched California US Senator Diane Feinstein's career. She, who had a driver for a very long time who was a spy for China. Now I wonder if the AIDs pump was being primed for profits by 1978. What came first? The chicken or the egg?
Thank you.
As always, critics offer no scientific evidence that HIV even exists much less is the cause of the range of symptoms claimed to be a disease known as AIDS.
Hopefully people really start to question the medical (as well as other) establishment/s to seek the truth. But as you say, it will be interesting to see how things unfold.
By July 1981, the CDC was looking for a pathogen that impacted upon T cells, had an association with KS, PCP pneumonia and Candidiasis, and was common in sexually active male homosexuals.
The answer = CMV.