I just started reading this, but I don't know if you've seen this interview with Jordan Petersen with some pro-vaxxine dude, it's pretty intense. He doesn't hold back.
That was awesome. And FYI — I’m not entirely against pharmaceutical treatments, for good reasons that I may address soon, although I think that the ones that make the most money are the most likely to be total scams. I don’t, however, think that all antibiotics are useless. Here’s an anecdote, which is worth the paper it’s printed on. My dad nearly died of intestinal tuberculosis as a child, and got better after being given an experimental antibiotic, which cured him very quickly. Now, it’s possible that some other effect of the drug caused his improvement. I think that the future of pharmacology really needs to involve investigating and reporting on just how broad spectrum so many medications are. I don’t think you can ever use a medication’s effectiveness to prove causation in any way, because most drugs are not specific.
Yes I agree that antibiotics can be useful. I did some looking into them and turns out it's similar to statins in that they have multiple modes of action. For instance, they often have anti-inflammatory properties. The terrain model suggests that bacteria show up once tissues is 'devitalized' or diseased and then begin breaking this tissue down. So wouldn't an antibiotic in this context be useful if you don't want the tissue further compromised? So is the benefit from inhibiting bacteria or from anti-inflammatory functions? Who knows so long as like in the case of your father it helped him.
I agree with this comment 100%. The ones that make the most money are the most dangerous. When I learned when and why they started prescribing statins I was shocked. And even mortified when I found out what my chances were of having a heart attack due to my cholesterol being a bit over their ever decreasing numbers as opposed to the side effects of the drugs. Theres no informed consent I can tell ya that.
Thanks for alerting us again to how the ghost of HIV hysteria continues to lurk in the shadows all around us, occasionally grabbing a fleeting but sinister media spotlight.
Happy Birthday to your book! Reading your book, your substack, along with the writings of Celia Farber, Peter Duesberg and John Lauritsen has been a huge game changer in my way of thinking. Props also to RFK Jr. for showcasing you in his 2021 book.
Being rant prone, I usually neglect to thank Miss Rebecca for her work and valuable information. So, thank you, Miss Rebecca- your efforts are appreciated.
Grateful for you, too, for giving well-thought-out information to those of us who actually consider logically all the smorgasbord of ideas, theories, and info being laid before us daily.
No problem Rebecca-I often get called Walker! Thank you for the cross post, it's great to get the info out to more people.
I sometimes write that science died in April 1984, but hadn't clocked ,until you said, that the 40th anniversary is in a few days.
I started working in pathology in 1988 in London in St Marys Hospital, which had an AIDS wing, my post was funded by the extra work predicted from lung biopsies etc. I didn't question the dogma until reading Virus Mania in 2021, the chapter on HIV/AIDS was when the scales fell from my eyes.
The fact is that there is no scientific evidence that viruses exist. People are free to believe as they wish, but one's beliefs and scientific evidence are two distinct questions. I am not an anti-vaxxer, as one who spent over 3 decades in the genomics field, why would I accept any medical treatment for some claimed entity that no scientific evidence confirms exists at all? I spent 15 yes training young scientists entering the vaccine production industry- as far as I can tell, vaccines are nothing more than the innards of dead cell cultures with added toxic compounds, such as aluminum, that are designed to elicit an inflammatory response which the vaccine industry then claims as evidence their vaccine works. I am not an anti-vaxxer, I oppose the injection of poisonous concoctions into either humans or animals. Yes, the medical establishment is corrupt, but it would have more to worry about if the "alternative" group would directly address the lack of scientific evidence, instead of demonizing those who are presenting scientific fact. No blame to the lay person- the subject is complicated and tortured to make it more so. Scientific evidence, not beliefs.
Rebecca, FYI your most recent post "This is Really Important" appears to have the comments turned off. Can you pls double check on that? I see some likes but no ability to comment on it. Thank you!
I believe RFK Jr is part of "their" group, in "the club"--Masons, deep staters, puppet masters for black nobility, however you wish to define the unseen controllers that are destroying our world. His choice for vice president certainly puts that nail in the coffin for me. Given that fact, I wonder what the deeper purpose of "The Real Anthony Fauci" book was? Stirring up greater division? Giving our new technocratic authorities, our coming Chinese-style slave state, ammunition for putting those of us who engaged in "wrong thought" and "wrong speak" away for good? I don't get Kennedy at all. He's clearly not a truth teller, at least of a significant kind, a kind that challenges the deep state control of our lives. He is the left version of Trump with the same ties to the black nobility destroying everything.
All the propaganda and lies being fed to us, and especially the numerous revelations in the last few years that we’ve been fed such, is making more people aware
that our primary sources of media are basically liars, obfuscators of the truth, and voices for their master(s).
to say the least the concept virus is a disputable concept, constructed in the hope of clarifying some kind of illness phenomena. What I read about virusses is the existence of it the starting point, but what follows then is just phantasy.
I just started reading this, but I don't know if you've seen this interview with Jordan Petersen with some pro-vaxxine dude, it's pretty intense. He doesn't hold back.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1772846475913109742
That was awesome. And FYI — I’m not entirely against pharmaceutical treatments, for good reasons that I may address soon, although I think that the ones that make the most money are the most likely to be total scams. I don’t, however, think that all antibiotics are useless. Here’s an anecdote, which is worth the paper it’s printed on. My dad nearly died of intestinal tuberculosis as a child, and got better after being given an experimental antibiotic, which cured him very quickly. Now, it’s possible that some other effect of the drug caused his improvement. I think that the future of pharmacology really needs to involve investigating and reporting on just how broad spectrum so many medications are. I don’t think you can ever use a medication’s effectiveness to prove causation in any way, because most drugs are not specific.
Yes I agree that antibiotics can be useful. I did some looking into them and turns out it's similar to statins in that they have multiple modes of action. For instance, they often have anti-inflammatory properties. The terrain model suggests that bacteria show up once tissues is 'devitalized' or diseased and then begin breaking this tissue down. So wouldn't an antibiotic in this context be useful if you don't want the tissue further compromised? So is the benefit from inhibiting bacteria or from anti-inflammatory functions? Who knows so long as like in the case of your father it helped him.
I agree with this comment 100%. The ones that make the most money are the most dangerous. When I learned when and why they started prescribing statins I was shocked. And even mortified when I found out what my chances were of having a heart attack due to my cholesterol being a bit over their ever decreasing numbers as opposed to the side effects of the drugs. Theres no informed consent I can tell ya that.
The fact that Luc Montagnier himself expressed doubts about the HIV -> AIDS paradigm should give everyone pause.
Thanks for alerting us again to how the ghost of HIV hysteria continues to lurk in the shadows all around us, occasionally grabbing a fleeting but sinister media spotlight.
Happy Birthday to your book! Reading your book, your substack, along with the writings of Celia Farber, Peter Duesberg and John Lauritsen has been a huge game changer in my way of thinking. Props also to RFK Jr. for showcasing you in his 2021 book.
Much appreciation to you!
Being rant prone, I usually neglect to thank Miss Rebecca for her work and valuable information. So, thank you, Miss Rebecca- your efforts are appreciated.
Grateful for you, too, for giving well-thought-out information to those of us who actually consider logically all the smorgasbord of ideas, theories, and info being laid before us daily.
Hiya Rebecca, here is my humble homage to the Perth group https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom
🙏🏽
Do you mind if I cross post?
I would be honoured and delighted, thank you Rebecca 🙏🏽
Unfortunately autocorrect changed Waller to Walker in my intro and I can’t seem to edit. I’m sorry about that!
No problem Rebecca-I often get called Walker! Thank you for the cross post, it's great to get the info out to more people.
I sometimes write that science died in April 1984, but hadn't clocked ,until you said, that the 40th anniversary is in a few days.
I started working in pathology in 1988 in London in St Marys Hospital, which had an AIDS wing, my post was funded by the extra work predicted from lung biopsies etc. I didn't question the dogma until reading Virus Mania in 2021, the chapter on HIV/AIDS was when the scales fell from my eyes.
Thanks!
The fact is that there is no scientific evidence that viruses exist. People are free to believe as they wish, but one's beliefs and scientific evidence are two distinct questions. I am not an anti-vaxxer, as one who spent over 3 decades in the genomics field, why would I accept any medical treatment for some claimed entity that no scientific evidence confirms exists at all? I spent 15 yes training young scientists entering the vaccine production industry- as far as I can tell, vaccines are nothing more than the innards of dead cell cultures with added toxic compounds, such as aluminum, that are designed to elicit an inflammatory response which the vaccine industry then claims as evidence their vaccine works. I am not an anti-vaxxer, I oppose the injection of poisonous concoctions into either humans or animals. Yes, the medical establishment is corrupt, but it would have more to worry about if the "alternative" group would directly address the lack of scientific evidence, instead of demonizing those who are presenting scientific fact. No blame to the lay person- the subject is complicated and tortured to make it more so. Scientific evidence, not beliefs.
Rebecca, FYI your most recent post "This is Really Important" appears to have the comments turned off. Can you pls double check on that? I see some likes but no ability to comment on it. Thank you!
Oh thank you! That was an oversight. Comments are on now.
I believe RFK Jr is part of "their" group, in "the club"--Masons, deep staters, puppet masters for black nobility, however you wish to define the unseen controllers that are destroying our world. His choice for vice president certainly puts that nail in the coffin for me. Given that fact, I wonder what the deeper purpose of "The Real Anthony Fauci" book was? Stirring up greater division? Giving our new technocratic authorities, our coming Chinese-style slave state, ammunition for putting those of us who engaged in "wrong thought" and "wrong speak" away for good? I don't get Kennedy at all. He's clearly not a truth teller, at least of a significant kind, a kind that challenges the deep state control of our lives. He is the left version of Trump with the same ties to the black nobility destroying everything.
All the propaganda and lies being fed to us, and especially the numerous revelations in the last few years that we’ve been fed such, is making more people aware
that our primary sources of media are basically liars, obfuscators of the truth, and voices for their master(s).
No “viruses” have been proven to exist. Ever.
to say the least the concept virus is a disputable concept, constructed in the hope of clarifying some kind of illness phenomena. What I read about virusses is the existence of it the starting point, but what follows then is just phantasy.