37 Comments

You've inspired me to drop a line to Gregg, challenging him to cite valid scientific evidence of "HIV", "its" causation of AIDS, and contagion :)

Expand full comment

HIV and its viral cousins exist in vast clouds of imminent danger all over the planet, isolating it should be a doddle.

Expand full comment

Please keep us updated :)

Expand full comment

Will do. He responded twice, then gave up. I will post the emails soon :)

Expand full comment

You forgot the anti-semitism.

Expand full comment
Mar 10Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

Antisemitic? Wow, they're scraping the bottom of the barrel on that one. They must have their underwear all pulled up and bunched too tightly now that people have woken up to covid, and that has renewed interested, or brought it to the forefront for the first time, for many people.

The comment about "raising the burden of proof so high that no real scientific work could offer answers on the topic at hand". That's something they leveled against the Perth Group. The PG did a long (like nearly 2 year long) debate on the BMJ Rapid Response website and that was one of the charges they leveled against them. 'Hey, no one can actually isolate like you insist they should' was the complaint. And then patiently each time the PG would remind them that it wasn't 'their method' but that of the very people who claimed to have isolated HIV.

Anyone who wants to see what kind of scientific chops Eleni had should read that long and elaborate debate to see what kind of a brilliant heavyweight she actually was. It's one thing to read their papers, and another to see her and Valendar Turner go head to head with the HIV protagonists.

Expand full comment
author

Yes, I assumed that line was directed at Perth.

Expand full comment
author
Mar 11·edited Apr 3Author

I remember that debate. I wonder how they respond to Etienne de Harven’s criticism of their isolation techniques, considering that he literally isolated the first retrovirus with Charlotte Friend and his electron micrographs looked nothing like the Rorschach plots meant to represent “HIV.” Eleni’s interview with Christine Johnson is phenomenal as well.

Expand full comment
Apr 7Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

Rebecca, I really enjoyed your book. I’ve read where the earlier HIV tests had issues with reliability. The CDC and others say the fourth and fifth generation tests used today are very accurate. I have little faith in the medical community when it comes to HIV testing and how reliable they say it is. What do you think? Thanks

Expand full comment
author

Good question. They’ve made them “more reliable” by adding “viral load” testing in certain cases, so the tests have arguably gotten WORSE in terms of false positives. The newer tests are more sensitive but the specificity, such as it is, has not improved.

Expand full comment

Thanks

Expand full comment

I’m trying to make sense of the sensitivity vs specificity and anti bodies vs p24 antigen. It seems very convoluted. A low CD4 T cell count can be good because your body is not fighting an infection, although a low CD 4 T cell count may be bad if for some reason your body cannot produce enough of them when you need them,: plus the levels of your CD 4 T cells can fluctuate for reasons that don’t mean you are sick. I am trying to make sense of it so I can explain it, I guess confusion is the beginning of understanding. Thanks

Expand full comment
Mar 11Liked by Rebecca Culshaw Smith

Thank you for dissecting this screed for us. The passages you quoted, if not so pathetic and potentially dangerous, sounded utterly farcical to me--topped off with a flourish of TDS (Trump derangement syndrome), no less!

Expand full comment
author

I shouldn’t have been surprised by the TDS, yet I was.

Expand full comment

Trump did not reverse course. The day after the sotu he bragged about warp speed again. Check his truth social posts.

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Expand full comment

The support for Gonsalves' line that Trump was going to defund schools with vaccine mandates came from a single tweet from Barbara Comstock, former Virginia legislator and political operative. He twice cited to her single tweet, but no other source provided.

Expand full comment

All stories that claim Trump is going to “hold these people to account” are fantasy land drool.

Expand full comment

Thanks for an interesting, important, but very long, blog post, Rebecca. I hope my comment will help you

Your question about "antisemetic":

"Antisemitism!" is often used as a "control word". It scares into compliance, or is seeking support against anyone accused. The parasite elite might also use it because they are in complete panic now. The stupidity during Covid-19 has really exposed their fraud. The cat is now really out of the bag.

"Antisemitism" might also refer to the fact that any criticism against Big Pharma or the military industrial complex, by vigilant intelligent people who are not completely naive, can be seen as a "conspiracy theory", them assuming there is a small club, often called "Jews", controlling everything.

There are many who believe this, often referring to "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", clearly written by a psycho, and clearly not following The Ten commandments of Judaism, and that is why real Jews are against the genocide in Gaza:

This is what the real Jews (Judaism) say about the Zionist killers in Israel

https://swebbtube.se/w/apep66yRkP8BS1kLqPreVC

Suggested defense:

1. Revelation 3:9. Clearly explains that they are NOT "Jews". Easy to see. A real Jew would not steal, be greedy or murder, like the Israel-regime and the IDF.

2. Locating real "antisemitism"suggesting hatred towards people having a Semitic language. At the moment, the only antisemitic actions being taken in the world is bombing civilian Semites in Gaza, people who are actually genetically from the area, unlike many Israelis with European or Khazarian origin, many of whom do not even speak Hebrew on arrival, and therefor clearly are not Semites. If they are supportive of genocide of Semites in Gaza, then they are clearly the real "antisemites".

Expand full comment

True, the Cabal that is labelling everyone as anti-Semitic are not themselves Semites. They are incapable of telling the truth about anything except what they are going to do to us. But they deny it after the fact. It's as if a word of truth spoken to goyim is an affront to their morality.

Expand full comment

The only person with the name Gonsalves who has done something good for humanity is the Great Canuck Rob Gonsalves, a very talented painter of many optical illusions:

https://tinyurl.com/mr2jz3b4

https://tinyurl.com/4u2zcnk4

https://tinyurl.com/yddawm8e

(Yes, I'm using beautiful art as an excuse to insult a disgusting communist mofo, because I like the contrast)

Expand full comment

It is beautiful art, I love art that exploits geometry. I'm a geometer, or that's what I call myself.

The quilts in the first link morph into farmland a la Escher. If you've flown over North America and Europe you'll notice that the bottom quilt is NA and the one above it is Europe.

My favourite of the Group of Seven is Lawren Harris. https://www.artcountrycanada.com/images/harris-lawren-mount-lefroy.jpeg

I did that in oil pastels when I was a kid.

Expand full comment
author

Have you seen any sculptural knitting? Some of it is really phenomenal. Someone knit an entire ornate fence out of fishing wire.

Expand full comment

Oh yeah, truly wonderful!

Expand full comment
author

My mom does landscape quilting and it is super cool.

Expand full comment

Great!

I'm an awful painter or drawer. You give me a compass and something will explode and hundreds would be evacuated to hospitals. But I love painters and painting. There is an "annunciation scene" by some artist named Fra Angelico which just sends me to the floor, shaking. Well, that's an exaggeration, but you probably understand.

Expand full comment

Im an AIDS denialist...or HIV denialist. Im not sure which one of these labels the murderous crooks who use these terms would define me with my experience in the matter. Sister was diagnosed with HIV in the late 90s. Wasnt typically someone who would listen to doctors..or anyone for that matter.. and didnt take any of their "treatments". Never got sick. Had 2 kids. Neither "infected". Boyfriend with "HIV" who partook in the treatments didnt make it. The one treated died and the one who denied the treatment lived..and never showed a symptom all her life. Unbelievable.

Expand full comment

There is not a lick of science in his dumb article.

Expand full comment

Great analysis. This line in the article caught my eye (and took my breath away): "Not satisfied with their promotion of Covid conspiracies and anti-vax hysteria—which, judging by the continued spread of Covid and childhood infections like measles, has been a big success—this sad little trio has turned its attention to an even older set of myths." Wait, what? Injecting several billion people with Covid poison did not stop the spread of "Covid." Yet even this nitwit knows that the injections cannot protect against "Covid infection" or that measles infections are typically among the vaccinated. Maybe if we all stay 6 feet apart HIV will go away.

Expand full comment

I emailed Gregg, challenged him to cite valid scientific evidence of "HIV" and contagion. His entire response was a URL lol: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024-03-10-11-Gregg-Gonsalves-sends-URL.png

Expand full comment

Thank you. I just read Paul Thacker's recent post on Gonsalves and it's a perfect bookend to this one. The ethical, moral and intellectual corruption of our society's institutional structures is quite breath-taking indeed. That a clown like Gonsalves can be employed at Yale speaks volumes.

Expand full comment

PS, just read Paul Thacker's post that you cross-posted, elaborating on Gregg Gonsalves' colorful legacy as pitbull for the pharma-medical establishment, from HIV to covid, and no doubt beyond. No wonder he was commissioned to stir up the specter of "AIDS denialism".

Expand full comment

Well done. Thank you for responding to this article.

I’ll take a crack at the “anti-semitism” comment in relation to “AIDS denialism” (though his fixation on Mbeki may somewhat negate it). “Anti-Semitic” because many who question the accepted narrative of “AIDS” are “white” and lean conservative ergo Adolph Hitler? It’s a favorite troupe of the post -WWII progressive left in America to make this fallacious logical leap again and again. That’s all I got.

Expand full comment

I've finished reading the post. It's the right length.

Expand full comment

Your posts are always insightful, brave and cogent. Given that high standard, this one strikes me as especially compelling and well-done, thank you.

Expand full comment