Jeff has a slight problem here in that the alleged "HIV" has never been found in any sick patient or anywhere else on the planet and virology is 100% pseudoscience, so he's involved in fraud, whether intentional or constructive. And lol: "the only Addimmune trial undertaken and completed to date—enrolled seven patients".
"The 5,000 to 10,000 per milliliter concentration is considered a long-term non-progression level"
Yeah, so just how does 5k to 10k 'virions' not ravage the immune system? If 'HIV' is supposed to be such a tank destroying the immune system, it seems that anything more than zero should kill a person. Of course we know that 'viral load' is not virions. And of course, how does this new fangled treatment actually translate to actual tangible health? The focus on markers is kinda nuts.
The other thing I kept thinking was, where are the controls? Of course when it comes to ARVs they'll never allow an actual proper control group of people not taking them because that's defined as unethical, but it's one more thing that keeps this charade alive.
Thanks for this Rebecca. Wow, I think Galvin is desperate to make a killing on his new 'renegade' transhumanistic approach to solving a non-problem (presence of "detectable" so-called HIV particles in someone's blood sample).
So with all the big technological advances this guy purports, could he maybe produce an electron microscope picture of actual "HIV" cells or nah? This is gibberish wrapped in a lab coat.
Jeff has a slight problem here in that the alleged "HIV" has never been found in any sick patient or anywhere else on the planet and virology is 100% pseudoscience, so he's involved in fraud, whether intentional or constructive. And lol: "the only Addimmune trial undertaken and completed to date—enrolled seven patients".
"The 5,000 to 10,000 per milliliter concentration is considered a long-term non-progression level"
Yeah, so just how does 5k to 10k 'virions' not ravage the immune system? If 'HIV' is supposed to be such a tank destroying the immune system, it seems that anything more than zero should kill a person. Of course we know that 'viral load' is not virions. And of course, how does this new fangled treatment actually translate to actual tangible health? The focus on markers is kinda nuts.
The other thing I kept thinking was, where are the controls? Of course when it comes to ARVs they'll never allow an actual proper control group of people not taking them because that's defined as unethical, but it's one more thing that keeps this charade alive.
The “cell as a computer” mantra is so out of line with recent biological thinking. I’m just astounded people take this clown even remotely seriously.
Thanks for this Rebecca. Wow, I think Galvin is desperate to make a killing on his new 'renegade' transhumanistic approach to solving a non-problem (presence of "detectable" so-called HIV particles in someone's blood sample).
So with all the big technological advances this guy purports, could he maybe produce an electron microscope picture of actual "HIV" cells or nah? This is gibberish wrapped in a lab coat.
aren't they just proteins which can be found in people who don't have hiv