Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
Looking at injectable drugs, there's a pretty clear economic and social rationale for getting us hooked. This is ChatGPT's answer to "Explain to me why injectable medications are considered lucrative for the healthcare industry" and it matches with research I have done directly.
Injectable medications are considered lucrative for the healthcare industry for several key reasons:
1. Higher Pricing and Reimbursement
Premium pricing: Injectable drugs, especially biologics and specialty medications, are often priced significantly higher than oral medications. This is due to their complex manufacturing processes, clinical value, and the lack of generic competition.
Reimbursement incentives: Many injectables are covered under the medical benefit (rather than the pharmacy benefit), which may allow for markups and provider-administered billing (e.g., “buy and bill” model), especially in outpatient or hospital settings.
2. Patent Protection and Market Exclusivity
Injectable biologics are often protected by longer and more complex patent portfolios, delaying biosimilar competition.
Fewer companies can make biosimilars due to the high cost and regulatory barriers for biologic development, extending the brand’s market dominance.
3. Provider-Administered Revenue
When injections are given in clinical settings (e.g., hospitals, outpatient infusion centers, specialty practices), providers often charge administration fees and can bill for the drug itself at a markup. This creates a revenue stream for hospitals and physicians.
This model incentivizes the use of higher-cost injectables over lower-cost oral alternatives.
4. Chronic Use and Repeat Dosing
Many injectables are used for chronic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, certain cancers), requiring regular administration—monthly, weekly, or even more frequently.
This ensures steady, repeat revenue for pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare system.
5. Specialty Pharmacy and Distribution Channels
Injectable drugs are typically distributed through specialty pharmacies or providers, which command high margins and offer services like cold-chain logistics, prior authorization support, and patient monitoring.
These services further embed these drugs into high-value healthcare networks.
So, which crime family controls decisions (including the current NIH dept.,) the Banksters, the intelligence community, Big Pharma (and the larger medical establishment,) the military complex, or, likely, the complicity of all?
And, let's not forget the two-tiered legal system which prevents many from gaining redress for the physical, emotional, and financial harms done to them at the hands of these crime families.
It aligns with what I've suspected for some time, that PrEP is simply altering biological markers that are read as 'positive'. One of the aspects he talks about is how PrEP may have a placebo type of effect that in turn stabilizes the underlying terrain signals the various HIV tests have been tuned to read. Given that, the long acting injectable (which probably has multiple action pathways) gives a person a strong placebo type of effect that they are safe and protected. This safe and protected belief affects a person's biology and stabilizes it enough that they don't test positive. It sounds kind of crazy, but if you read through his articles I think it makes sense. This is one aspect of what I think might be going on with PrEP.
This placebo/nocebo effect is something I strongly believe played a huge part back in the 80s and 90s with guys getting sick and dying.
Just another ruse for the 'powers that shouldn't be' to get the self-assembly nanotach in whoever is gullible enough to beLIEve that injecting anything into your body is for health.
Are we hearing how dangerous the injectables are, from the likes of McCullough, so that uptake drops and then our digital ID will have us totally trapped? More and more people trying to prioritise health. Forced to give up travel.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Some of us saw it coming.
Looking at injectable drugs, there's a pretty clear economic and social rationale for getting us hooked. This is ChatGPT's answer to "Explain to me why injectable medications are considered lucrative for the healthcare industry" and it matches with research I have done directly.
Injectable medications are considered lucrative for the healthcare industry for several key reasons:
1. Higher Pricing and Reimbursement
Premium pricing: Injectable drugs, especially biologics and specialty medications, are often priced significantly higher than oral medications. This is due to their complex manufacturing processes, clinical value, and the lack of generic competition.
Reimbursement incentives: Many injectables are covered under the medical benefit (rather than the pharmacy benefit), which may allow for markups and provider-administered billing (e.g., “buy and bill” model), especially in outpatient or hospital settings.
2. Patent Protection and Market Exclusivity
Injectable biologics are often protected by longer and more complex patent portfolios, delaying biosimilar competition.
Fewer companies can make biosimilars due to the high cost and regulatory barriers for biologic development, extending the brand’s market dominance.
3. Provider-Administered Revenue
When injections are given in clinical settings (e.g., hospitals, outpatient infusion centers, specialty practices), providers often charge administration fees and can bill for the drug itself at a markup. This creates a revenue stream for hospitals and physicians.
This model incentivizes the use of higher-cost injectables over lower-cost oral alternatives.
4. Chronic Use and Repeat Dosing
Many injectables are used for chronic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, certain cancers), requiring regular administration—monthly, weekly, or even more frequently.
This ensures steady, repeat revenue for pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare system.
5. Specialty Pharmacy and Distribution Channels
Injectable drugs are typically distributed through specialty pharmacies or providers, which command high margins and offer services like cold-chain logistics, prior authorization support, and patient monitoring.
These services further embed these drugs into high-value healthcare networks.
I watched David Rasnick commenting about how wrong it is to chronically inject things in people. In this video by Zowe Smith:
https://rumble.com/v6w07k0-turbo-cancer-part-1-debunking-flawed-cancer-theories-with-david-rasnick-phd.html
Around minute 54.
The ARVs and PReP drugs were at one point cancer drugs, right?
So, which crime family controls decisions (including the current NIH dept.,) the Banksters, the intelligence community, Big Pharma (and the larger medical establishment,) the military complex, or, likely, the complicity of all?
And, let's not forget the two-tiered legal system which prevents many from gaining redress for the physical, emotional, and financial harms done to them at the hands of these crime families.
Have you followed the relatively new substack Eyes to See? He's got a series on 'HIV positivity', and how PrEP is likely working.
https://substack.com/@eyestoseeandearstohear
It aligns with what I've suspected for some time, that PrEP is simply altering biological markers that are read as 'positive'. One of the aspects he talks about is how PrEP may have a placebo type of effect that in turn stabilizes the underlying terrain signals the various HIV tests have been tuned to read. Given that, the long acting injectable (which probably has multiple action pathways) gives a person a strong placebo type of effect that they are safe and protected. This safe and protected belief affects a person's biology and stabilizes it enough that they don't test positive. It sounds kind of crazy, but if you read through his articles I think it makes sense. This is one aspect of what I think might be going on with PrEP.
This placebo/nocebo effect is something I strongly believe played a huge part back in the 80s and 90s with guys getting sick and dying.
Just another ruse for the 'powers that shouldn't be' to get the self-assembly nanotach in whoever is gullible enough to beLIEve that injecting anything into your body is for health.
Are we hearing how dangerous the injectables are, from the likes of McCullough, so that uptake drops and then our digital ID will have us totally trapped? More and more people trying to prioritise health. Forced to give up travel.
reverse psychology persuasion, right?
It's amazing how well it works, and also amazing how well they control the both sides of every controversy.