Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marilyn Langlois's avatar

Pretty amazing that the LA Times would publish such an article in 1990! I wonder what happened to the person who wrote it, and if the Times published some "damage control" soon afterwards. It's also amazing that more HIV/AIDS researchers didn't pick up on this obvious clue that something was seriously flawed with the whole HIV causes AIDS paradigm, considering KS was viewed as a hallmark manifestation of HIV/AIDS throughout the '80's. Shows how deeply entrenched the dogma was.

Expand full comment
Charles Geshekter's avatar

It seems that Kaposi’s sarcoma was long considered a crucial indicator disease of AIDS cases in the US and Europe.

Can someone explain why KS cases were so rare and unusual in Uganda, Tanzania, Congo and other African countries?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts