Mandatory HIV testing for pregnant women
Pick up the Kindle version of The Real AIDS Epidemic for free until June 26.
When I had my first two children (in 2007 and 2008), HIV testing was performed on an opt-out basis, meaning that if you explicitly declined testing for HIV antibodies, you would not be tested. But you had to explicitly state that you declined the HIV test. By the time I had my third child, in 2011, HIV testing was mandatory either during pregnancy or of the baby at birth. There was no opt-out; if you didn’t test, then your baby would be at birth.
Texas law regarding prenatal HIV testing
This is interesting to me, because what changed between 2008 and 2011? Given The Perth Group’s YouTube video about maternal HIV antibodies in babies, which shows clearly that whatever HIV antibodies in newborn babies represent, it is not an active retroviral infection; and the fact that pregnancy itself is a known cause of false positive HIV tests, this protocol seems like a spectacularly bad idea.
What do you think? Why do you suppose testing of pregnant women became mandatory, and do you agree with it? (What could possibly go wrong?)
Like with mandating shots, I think they have to be actually safe for mandates to even be on the table. If there is a chance of hurting even 1 in every billion then it has to be choice.
So with these tests. I think they have to be super accurate for mandated tests to be on the table.
I still disagree with mandates on an ethical level I am just saying the govt shouldn't even get close to mandates unless they fix the problems with the tests and shots and all the rest.
Almost seems like there is an agenda and I don't think money is even in the top 3 goals of the people making the agenda.
I did not know that HIV testing was mandatory in newborns and pregnancy. I am fine with people choosing to test, or not choosing to test, but being mandatory is, as Rebecca states, “a spectacularly bad idea“.
In the United States we might be able to challenge this in court. Especially after the Covid testing fiasco, people are more willing to accept personal choice.
I expect this would be mainly a state government decision. However, if there is any move on the federal level it would come only if RFK Junior is elected president, which actually is a possibility. Because the mainstream media has blacked out and targeted him, it is up to people like us to encourage others to actually listen to his interviews and hear what his policies are. For example, here is a nice short one I like to share.
https://rumble.com/v2w67cr-if-you-become-president-how-will-vaccine-policy-change-rfk-jr.-new-hampshir.html