Answers to your questions

Part One - Part Two coming this week

I had quite a few questions in response to Ask Me Anything, so I’ll split them up into two groups, arranged chronologically in order of receipt. I will answer every question asked directly to me, so if I don’t get to it today, I promise that I will. You can always ask me questions directly via emailing a reply to a post.

From Peter:

So there’s a lot more people that are showing on the daily on a popular forum. Negative to hiv but have aids like symptoms. Showing up weekly I’m assuming due to Covid reactivating herpes viruses, like hhv6a. Now if hhv6a is the cause what is the difference in people testing positive to hiv and the others diagnosed with “CFS” like I don’t believe the theory about hiv but clearly hiv patients respond better on antivirals than cfs patients . Help please?

The fact is that we have no idea how CFS patients would respond to “antivirals,” because the powers that be are resolutely refusing to allow the research and trials to happen in the first place, so the answer is we don’t know because we aren’t allowed to ask the question.

I asked my colleague, Neenyah Ostrom, who knows much more about CFS than I do, and here is her answer: “[…] because there’s no test or other accurate way to way to diagnose CFS, we don’t know who is properly diagnosed and who is sick from another cause (so I’m not saying these people aren’t truly sick, which I’m sure they are).  Until there’s enough funding and attention to researching CFS, we won’t be able to answer these questions because […] we’re not allowed to ask them.”

From Gregory:

Knowing the fraud of how they use the PCR test, what other processes are goofy? Like how do they come up with the "Viral Load" number or the C-Cell count? Are those real?

Well, viral load itself is calculated using PCR technology, which was no accident. One of Peter Duesberg’s original criticisms of the HIV AIDS story was that “HIV” itself was impossible to find in AIDS patients; that paradox was “solved” in the mid-1990s with the bastardization of Kary Mullis’s invention (Mullis himself famously stated that “quantitative PCR is an oxymoron,” which is exactly what they do with PCR). So the “viral load” numbers we hear do not represent infectious particles at all, but amplifications of genetic fragments. Even the mainstream literature asserts that viral load overstates infectious virus by a factor of sixty thousand.

As to T-cells, which is assume is what was meant, I think they are just counted like any other blood cells, so that isn’t a problem, but what is odd is that no one other than HIV patients even get their T cells counted (conveniently, the technology used to count T cells was only developed at the beginning of AIDS), so how do we really know what’s normal and how relevant these are? It would be illuminating to see how T cells react in the presence of other disease states.

As to what other processes are goofy, check out my post on False Positive Down Syndrome Screening. It’s pretty crazy.

From Steven:

If AIDS patients were having positive HIV tests but HIV didn’t cause AIDS, what do you think was causing the positive reaction? Could a bacterial infection like TB or another virus like Herpes cause a positive HIV test? Why do some people continue to have positive HIV tests without showing any symptoms of disease? What is causing a positive HIV test in a seemingly healthy person?

There is a list online of 70ish conditions that may cause “false positives” on an “HIV test,” but the short answer is: hypergammaglobulinemia. This basically means “too many antibodies to too many things.” Information on the internet is mixed regarding false positive causes, although it is generally acknowledged that influenza vaccines and pregnancy can cause “false positives.” Interestingly enough, apparently Covid itself can cause “false positive” tests.

There is also the phenomenon of endogenous retroviral activation, in which fragments of our endogenous retroviral DNA can be expressed and appear as viral-like fragments, and potentially induce antibodies. Who even knows at this point?

From Grasshopper Kaplan:

John helmer suggests possibly the hacksxxxine injextions he called a vaccine may have brought about his stroke, that killed Alexey Navalney, as this is a common outcome if he had been only 47, we're told.

Although I first thought the same, since his wife volunteered as the new anti-Putin I reconsidered and think he was actually killed.

Illyoolia Navalney was invited to that Munich insecurity confab months ago...

This doesn’t seem to contain a question, but the number of people that have “died suddenly” at a young age is disturbing. Having said that, dictatorial regimes do have a history of offing their enemies.

From Larry Brownstein:

What causes Herpes? Are leprosy, syphilis and assorted other diseases that manifest in skin lesions all really the same disease? I've read Bauer's book The Origin, Persistence and Failings of HIV/AIDS theory as well as your book. You don't seem to be as certain that HIV is not the cause of AIDS, as is Bauer is. Is that right?

There was at one point a critical theory that AIDS and syphilis were actually the same disease, although we don’t hear much about it these days. Bauer’s book is one of the top books I recommend to people that are just getting interested in this stuff, as well as Michelle Cochrane’s When AIDS Began. I will say that I am as certain as I can be that “HIV,” if it exists, does not cause disease. As to herpes, there are allegedly 130+ herpes viruses among the animal kingdom, including nine human herpes viruses, although my understanding is that some of them may be misclassified. I’m not an expert on this, though, so take my words with that in mind.

From Agent Roger dualistic nature (love the handle):

Dear Rebecca, I have lots of questions for you.

I will offer just two:

First: Which of these is a better pet: a cat, a dog or a Norwegian Hyacinth Macaw?

Second: How much would it cost to build a bridge over the Pacific Ocean, connecting San Francisco to Cape Town, assuming our planet is flat so that the architects don't get anxiety with the curvature?

First question: The answer is CLEARLY none of the above. It’s a raccoon. Sadly, though those those are legal to own as pets in Texas, I have been outvoted in my own home and must make do with one cat and four dogs. A bird is a terrible pet, or at least I imagine it would be. They constantly yell at you with accusations like “Dangerous woman!”

Second question: Given that logically, a false premise implies any conclusion, I can confidently say that if the earth is flat, the bridge will be free.

That seems like a good place to stop for the day. I’ll answer the rest of your questions midweek. I’m also working on an interesting piece about the problems with the HPV vaccine, so stay tuned for that.

To support my work on Substack, please purchase my book for yourself or for a friend, and leave a review on Amazon. You can learn about efforts to ban my book here. You can also buy my minibook about censorship in AIDS, Almost Cancelled.

If you’re a new reader and would like some background as to my views on HIV AIDS, including the “existence” question, please refer to this post and the links contained therein.